{"title":"循环置换码的编码与解码","authors":"Peter G. Neumann","doi":"10.1109/TEC.1962.5219390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maximum-likelihood encoding and decoding procedures are presented for cyclic permutation error-correcting codes. These procedures take advantage of the cyclic permutation structure, and are applicable to all such codes. On the other hand, familiar parity-checking procedures are applicable only to those few cyclic permutation codes which are group codes. A comparison of the two different procedures for the group code case shows that they are roughly comparable in complexity.","PeriodicalId":177496,"journal":{"name":"IRE Trans. Electron. Comput.","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1962-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Encoding and Decoding for Cyclic Permutation Codes\",\"authors\":\"Peter G. Neumann\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TEC.1962.5219390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Maximum-likelihood encoding and decoding procedures are presented for cyclic permutation error-correcting codes. These procedures take advantage of the cyclic permutation structure, and are applicable to all such codes. On the other hand, familiar parity-checking procedures are applicable only to those few cyclic permutation codes which are group codes. A comparison of the two different procedures for the group code case shows that they are roughly comparable in complexity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IRE Trans. Electron. Comput.\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1962-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IRE Trans. Electron. Comput.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.1962.5219390\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRE Trans. Electron. Comput.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.1962.5219390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Encoding and Decoding for Cyclic Permutation Codes
Maximum-likelihood encoding and decoding procedures are presented for cyclic permutation error-correcting codes. These procedures take advantage of the cyclic permutation structure, and are applicable to all such codes. On the other hand, familiar parity-checking procedures are applicable only to those few cyclic permutation codes which are group codes. A comparison of the two different procedures for the group code case shows that they are roughly comparable in complexity.