循环置换码的编码与解码

Peter G. Neumann
{"title":"循环置换码的编码与解码","authors":"Peter G. Neumann","doi":"10.1109/TEC.1962.5219390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maximum-likelihood encoding and decoding procedures are presented for cyclic permutation error-correcting codes. These procedures take advantage of the cyclic permutation structure, and are applicable to all such codes. On the other hand, familiar parity-checking procedures are applicable only to those few cyclic permutation codes which are group codes. A comparison of the two different procedures for the group code case shows that they are roughly comparable in complexity.","PeriodicalId":177496,"journal":{"name":"IRE Trans. Electron. Comput.","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1962-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Encoding and Decoding for Cyclic Permutation Codes\",\"authors\":\"Peter G. Neumann\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TEC.1962.5219390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Maximum-likelihood encoding and decoding procedures are presented for cyclic permutation error-correcting codes. These procedures take advantage of the cyclic permutation structure, and are applicable to all such codes. On the other hand, familiar parity-checking procedures are applicable only to those few cyclic permutation codes which are group codes. A comparison of the two different procedures for the group code case shows that they are roughly comparable in complexity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IRE Trans. Electron. Comput.\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1962-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IRE Trans. Electron. Comput.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.1962.5219390\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRE Trans. Electron. Comput.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.1962.5219390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

提出了循环置换纠错码的最大似然编码和解码方法。这些程序利用循环排列结构,并适用于所有这样的代码。另一方面,我们所熟悉的奇偶校验程序只适用于少数属于群码的循环置换码。对组代码用例的两种不同过程的比较表明,它们在复杂性上大致相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Encoding and Decoding for Cyclic Permutation Codes
Maximum-likelihood encoding and decoding procedures are presented for cyclic permutation error-correcting codes. These procedures take advantage of the cyclic permutation structure, and are applicable to all such codes. On the other hand, familiar parity-checking procedures are applicable only to those few cyclic permutation codes which are group codes. A comparison of the two different procedures for the group code case shows that they are roughly comparable in complexity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信