{"title":"丰富词的回文和因子复杂度上限","authors":"Josef Rukavicka","doi":"10.1051/ITA/2020008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A finite word w of length n contains at most n + 1 distinct palindromic factors. If the bound n + 1 is attained, the word w is called rich. An infinite word w is called rich if every finite factor of w is rich.\n\nLet w be a word (finite or infinite) over an alphabet with q > 1 letters, let Facw(n) be the set of factors of length n of the word w, and let Palw(n) ⊆ Facw(n) be the set of palindromic factors of length n of the word w.\n\nWe present several upper bounds for |Facw(n)| and |Palw(n)|, where w is a rich word. Let δ = [see formula in PDF]. In particular we show that\n\n|Facw(n)| ≤ (4q2n)δ ln 2n+2.\n\nIn 2007, Baláži, Masáková, and Pelantová showed that\n\n|Palw(n)|+|Palw(n+1)| ≤ |Facw(n+1)|-|Facw(n)|+2,\n\nwhere w is an infinite word whose set of factors is closed under reversal. We prove this inequality for every finite word v with |v| ≥ n + 1 and v(n + 1) closed under reversal.","PeriodicalId":438841,"journal":{"name":"RAIRO Theor. Informatics Appl.","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Upper bound for palindromic and factor complexity of rich words\",\"authors\":\"Josef Rukavicka\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/ITA/2020008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A finite word w of length n contains at most n + 1 distinct palindromic factors. If the bound n + 1 is attained, the word w is called rich. An infinite word w is called rich if every finite factor of w is rich.\\n\\nLet w be a word (finite or infinite) over an alphabet with q > 1 letters, let Facw(n) be the set of factors of length n of the word w, and let Palw(n) ⊆ Facw(n) be the set of palindromic factors of length n of the word w.\\n\\nWe present several upper bounds for |Facw(n)| and |Palw(n)|, where w is a rich word. Let δ = [see formula in PDF]. In particular we show that\\n\\n|Facw(n)| ≤ (4q2n)δ ln 2n+2.\\n\\nIn 2007, Baláži, Masáková, and Pelantová showed that\\n\\n|Palw(n)|+|Palw(n+1)| ≤ |Facw(n+1)|-|Facw(n)|+2,\\n\\nwhere w is an infinite word whose set of factors is closed under reversal. We prove this inequality for every finite word v with |v| ≥ n + 1 and v(n + 1) closed under reversal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RAIRO Theor. Informatics Appl.\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RAIRO Theor. Informatics Appl.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/ITA/2020008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAIRO Theor. Informatics Appl.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ITA/2020008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Upper bound for palindromic and factor complexity of rich words
A finite word w of length n contains at most n + 1 distinct palindromic factors. If the bound n + 1 is attained, the word w is called rich. An infinite word w is called rich if every finite factor of w is rich.
Let w be a word (finite or infinite) over an alphabet with q > 1 letters, let Facw(n) be the set of factors of length n of the word w, and let Palw(n) ⊆ Facw(n) be the set of palindromic factors of length n of the word w.
We present several upper bounds for |Facw(n)| and |Palw(n)|, where w is a rich word. Let δ = [see formula in PDF]. In particular we show that
|Facw(n)| ≤ (4q2n)δ ln 2n+2.
In 2007, Baláži, Masáková, and Pelantová showed that
|Palw(n)|+|Palw(n+1)| ≤ |Facw(n+1)|-|Facw(n)|+2,
where w is an infinite word whose set of factors is closed under reversal. We prove this inequality for every finite word v with |v| ≥ n + 1 and v(n + 1) closed under reversal.