南亚宗教激发的政治两极分化巴基斯坦建国的起源

Raza A
{"title":"南亚宗教激发的政治两极分化巴基斯坦建国的起源","authors":"Raza A","doi":"10.23880/aeoaj-16000214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1880, Sir William Patrick Andrew published “Our Scientific Frontier”, a book containing the essence of his colossal work stretched over four decades of career as the father of British India Railways. Conceding to his recommendations, dogged by obsessive fear of the Russian invasion of India (Thorburn, 1894), the northwest frontier region of the Indian Peninsula, popularly known as the “Borderlands” was separated from the mainland India and, created as an independent state; named Pakistan in 1947 to serve as a “Frontline State” juxtaposed to the “Buffer State” of Afghanistan (Andrew, 1880) under the garb of an independent homeland for Muslims in India on religious grounds (Wink, 1991) (Chandra, 1997 ). However, being suspicious of imminent revolt by the local population, especially the Punjabi peasantry resulting from the British purge during their rule, Sir Andrew strategized the concept of fragmenting the “already polarised” Muslim community into two distinct segments; the elite class as the ruling component unflinchingly loyal to the British and the non-elite segment, though in majority but clutched by “the devised mechanism” of the religion of Islam. Conceiving the idea of “Bigoted Fanaticism”, he envisaged an impenetrable demographic defensive line against any invader from the northwest (Afghanistan) and the west (Iran) (Andrew, 1880). Based on his conclusion that “in these border lands (Pakistan) to have a rival in prestige and power would be dangerous; to have a superior would be impossible”, the British nurtured the chosen elite to rule the country but, geo-strategically serve the western interests. This is how the legacy of the British rule is still entrenched in which “the Religio- Populist Dogmatism” plays the most crucial role in the national politics. A study had been conducted to investigate the genesis of the religio-populist dogmatism in Pakistan which has always been employed as the most potent instrument in political campaigns in Pakistan by every political party irrespective its religious inclinations.","PeriodicalId":125575,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology and Ethnology Open Access Journal","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Religiously-Inspired Political Polarization of South Asia the Genesis of the Creation of Pakistan\",\"authors\":\"Raza A\",\"doi\":\"10.23880/aeoaj-16000214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1880, Sir William Patrick Andrew published “Our Scientific Frontier”, a book containing the essence of his colossal work stretched over four decades of career as the father of British India Railways. Conceding to his recommendations, dogged by obsessive fear of the Russian invasion of India (Thorburn, 1894), the northwest frontier region of the Indian Peninsula, popularly known as the “Borderlands” was separated from the mainland India and, created as an independent state; named Pakistan in 1947 to serve as a “Frontline State” juxtaposed to the “Buffer State” of Afghanistan (Andrew, 1880) under the garb of an independent homeland for Muslims in India on religious grounds (Wink, 1991) (Chandra, 1997 ). However, being suspicious of imminent revolt by the local population, especially the Punjabi peasantry resulting from the British purge during their rule, Sir Andrew strategized the concept of fragmenting the “already polarised” Muslim community into two distinct segments; the elite class as the ruling component unflinchingly loyal to the British and the non-elite segment, though in majority but clutched by “the devised mechanism” of the religion of Islam. Conceiving the idea of “Bigoted Fanaticism”, he envisaged an impenetrable demographic defensive line against any invader from the northwest (Afghanistan) and the west (Iran) (Andrew, 1880). Based on his conclusion that “in these border lands (Pakistan) to have a rival in prestige and power would be dangerous; to have a superior would be impossible”, the British nurtured the chosen elite to rule the country but, geo-strategically serve the western interests. This is how the legacy of the British rule is still entrenched in which “the Religio- Populist Dogmatism” plays the most crucial role in the national politics. A study had been conducted to investigate the genesis of the religio-populist dogmatism in Pakistan which has always been employed as the most potent instrument in political campaigns in Pakistan by every political party irrespective its religious inclinations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":125575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropology and Ethnology Open Access Journal\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropology and Ethnology Open Access Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23880/aeoaj-16000214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology and Ethnology Open Access Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/aeoaj-16000214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1880年,威廉·帕特里克·安德鲁爵士(Sir William Patrick Andrew)出版了《我们的科学前沿》(Our Scientific Frontier)一书,书中包含了他作为英属印度铁路之父四十年职业生涯中大量工作的精华。迫于对俄国入侵印度的恐惧(索伯恩,1894),印度半岛的西北边境地区,俗称“边疆”,被从印度大陆分离出来,建立了一个独立的国家;1947年将巴基斯坦命名为“前线国家”,与阿富汗的“缓冲国”并列(Andrew, 1880),以宗教理由为印度穆斯林提供独立家园的外衣(Wink, 1991) (Chandra, 1997)。然而,由于怀疑当地居民即将起义,特别是旁遮普农民,由于英国统治期间的清洗,安德鲁爵士制定了将“已经两极分化”的穆斯林社区分裂为两个不同部分的概念;精英阶层作为统治的组成部分,坚定不移地忠于英国,而非精英阶层虽然占多数,但被伊斯兰教的“设计机制”所控制。他构想了“顽固的狂热主义”的概念,设想了一条不可逾越的人口防线,以抵御来自西北(阿富汗)和西部(伊朗)的任何入侵者(安德鲁,1880)。根据他的结论,“在这些边境地区(巴基斯坦),在声望和权力上有对手将是危险的;有一个上级是不可能的”,英国培养了被选中的精英来统治国家,但在地缘战略上服务于西方的利益。这就是英国统治的遗产仍然根深蒂固的原因,其中“宗教-民粹主义教条主义”在国家政治中发挥着最关键的作用。已经进行了一项研究,以调查巴基斯坦宗教-民粹主义教条主义的起源,这种教条主义一直被巴基斯坦的每一个政党,不论其宗教倾向如何,用作政治运动中最有力的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Religiously-Inspired Political Polarization of South Asia the Genesis of the Creation of Pakistan
In 1880, Sir William Patrick Andrew published “Our Scientific Frontier”, a book containing the essence of his colossal work stretched over four decades of career as the father of British India Railways. Conceding to his recommendations, dogged by obsessive fear of the Russian invasion of India (Thorburn, 1894), the northwest frontier region of the Indian Peninsula, popularly known as the “Borderlands” was separated from the mainland India and, created as an independent state; named Pakistan in 1947 to serve as a “Frontline State” juxtaposed to the “Buffer State” of Afghanistan (Andrew, 1880) under the garb of an independent homeland for Muslims in India on religious grounds (Wink, 1991) (Chandra, 1997 ). However, being suspicious of imminent revolt by the local population, especially the Punjabi peasantry resulting from the British purge during their rule, Sir Andrew strategized the concept of fragmenting the “already polarised” Muslim community into two distinct segments; the elite class as the ruling component unflinchingly loyal to the British and the non-elite segment, though in majority but clutched by “the devised mechanism” of the religion of Islam. Conceiving the idea of “Bigoted Fanaticism”, he envisaged an impenetrable demographic defensive line against any invader from the northwest (Afghanistan) and the west (Iran) (Andrew, 1880). Based on his conclusion that “in these border lands (Pakistan) to have a rival in prestige and power would be dangerous; to have a superior would be impossible”, the British nurtured the chosen elite to rule the country but, geo-strategically serve the western interests. This is how the legacy of the British rule is still entrenched in which “the Religio- Populist Dogmatism” plays the most crucial role in the national politics. A study had been conducted to investigate the genesis of the religio-populist dogmatism in Pakistan which has always been employed as the most potent instrument in political campaigns in Pakistan by every political party irrespective its religious inclinations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信