{"title":"书评“比较法:一本手册”(Örücü和尼尔肯,编辑)","authors":"M. Siems","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1117414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last two years three important comparative law handbooks have been published (Comparative Law: A Handbook, ed. by Orucu and Nelken 2007; The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, ed. by Rei¬mann and Zimmermann 2006; Elgar Encyclopaedia of Comparative Law, ed. by Smits 2006). The authors of these handbooks can be regarded as today's leading comparative lawyers. However, one may be wondering whether there is an elephant in the room that is missed by all three handbooks. Based on hits in the Westlaw's database WORLD-JLR it can indeed be suggested that two of the most-cited comparatists have been ignored: on the one hand Pierre Legrand, and on the other Rafael La Porta (as a proxy for the new quantitative comparative methodology).","PeriodicalId":172026,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Comparative Law (Topic)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review of 'Comparative Law: A Handbook' (Örücü and Nelken, eds.)\",\"authors\":\"M. Siems\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1117414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the last two years three important comparative law handbooks have been published (Comparative Law: A Handbook, ed. by Orucu and Nelken 2007; The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, ed. by Rei¬mann and Zimmermann 2006; Elgar Encyclopaedia of Comparative Law, ed. by Smits 2006). The authors of these handbooks can be regarded as today's leading comparative lawyers. However, one may be wondering whether there is an elephant in the room that is missed by all three handbooks. Based on hits in the Westlaw's database WORLD-JLR it can indeed be suggested that two of the most-cited comparatists have been ignored: on the one hand Pierre Legrand, and on the other Rafael La Porta (as a proxy for the new quantitative comparative methodology).\",\"PeriodicalId\":172026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Comparative Law (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Comparative Law (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1117414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Comparative Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1117414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在过去两年中出版了三本重要的比较法手册(比较法:一本手册,由Orucu和Nelken编辑,2007;《牛津比较法手册》,赖曼和齐默尔曼主编,2006年;埃尔加比较法百科全书,Smits编辑,2006年)。这些手册的作者可以被视为当今领先的比较律师。然而,有人可能会想,是否有一个房间里的大象,这三个手册都遗漏了。根据Westlaw的数据库WORLD-JLR的点击率,确实可以认为有两个被引用最多的比较学家被忽视了:一个是Pierre Legrand,另一个是Rafael La Porta(作为新的定量比较方法的代表)。
Book Review of 'Comparative Law: A Handbook' (Örücü and Nelken, eds.)
In the last two years three important comparative law handbooks have been published (Comparative Law: A Handbook, ed. by Orucu and Nelken 2007; The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, ed. by Rei¬mann and Zimmermann 2006; Elgar Encyclopaedia of Comparative Law, ed. by Smits 2006). The authors of these handbooks can be regarded as today's leading comparative lawyers. However, one may be wondering whether there is an elephant in the room that is missed by all three handbooks. Based on hits in the Westlaw's database WORLD-JLR it can indeed be suggested that two of the most-cited comparatists have been ignored: on the one hand Pierre Legrand, and on the other Rafael La Porta (as a proxy for the new quantitative comparative methodology).