奇偶校验了

Marla Perkins
{"title":"奇偶校验了","authors":"Marla Perkins","doi":"10.1075/ld.00116.per","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Following Bakhtin (e.g., [1999] 1984, 184), dialogue studies have\n assumed at least some form of parity between dialogic participants. But what happens when parity is significantly disrupted or\n lost entirely? In this report of cultural practice among the Hobongan living on the island of Borneo, I examine the results of\n lost parity on traditional Hobongan and Christian-influenced cultural practices. The Hobongan typically acknowledge the lack of\n parity and ignore it, or they accept the lack of parity and try to rejoin polyphony through conversion. Syncretism presents a more\n complex case because dialogue remains possible: both Hobongan and Christian-influenced practices are combined to avoid unpleasant\n dialogues.","PeriodicalId":244145,"journal":{"name":"When Dialogue Fails","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parity lost\",\"authors\":\"Marla Perkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ld.00116.per\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Following Bakhtin (e.g., [1999] 1984, 184), dialogue studies have\\n assumed at least some form of parity between dialogic participants. But what happens when parity is significantly disrupted or\\n lost entirely? In this report of cultural practice among the Hobongan living on the island of Borneo, I examine the results of\\n lost parity on traditional Hobongan and Christian-influenced cultural practices. The Hobongan typically acknowledge the lack of\\n parity and ignore it, or they accept the lack of parity and try to rejoin polyphony through conversion. Syncretism presents a more\\n complex case because dialogue remains possible: both Hobongan and Christian-influenced practices are combined to avoid unpleasant\\n dialogues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":244145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"When Dialogue Fails\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"When Dialogue Fails\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00116.per\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"When Dialogue Fails","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00116.per","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

继巴赫金(例如,[1999]1984,184)之后,对话研究假定对话参与者之间至少存在某种形式的平等。但是,当平价被严重破坏或完全丧失时会发生什么?在这篇关于生活在婆罗洲岛上的霍本干人文化习俗的报告中,我考察了传统霍本干人和受基督教影响的文化习俗失去平衡的结果。Hobongan人通常承认奇偶性的缺失而忽略它,或者他们接受奇偶性的缺失并尝试通过转换重新加入复调。融合主义呈现出一个更复杂的情况,因为对话仍然是可能的:Hobongan和基督教影响的实践结合在一起,以避免不愉快的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Parity lost
Following Bakhtin (e.g., [1999] 1984, 184), dialogue studies have assumed at least some form of parity between dialogic participants. But what happens when parity is significantly disrupted or lost entirely? In this report of cultural practice among the Hobongan living on the island of Borneo, I examine the results of lost parity on traditional Hobongan and Christian-influenced cultural practices. The Hobongan typically acknowledge the lack of parity and ignore it, or they accept the lack of parity and try to rejoin polyphony through conversion. Syncretism presents a more complex case because dialogue remains possible: both Hobongan and Christian-influenced practices are combined to avoid unpleasant dialogues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信