{"title":"CMOS环形振荡器相位噪声模型的比较","authors":"B. Leung","doi":"10.1109/MWSCAS.2008.4616757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comparisons of phase noise models based on time domain models and frequency domain models are presented. It is shown that time domain approach by this author, based on conventional time scaling and that incorporates multiple threshold crossing phenomenon, reflects the physical mechanism better. Moreover its phase noise expression does not blow up as offset frequency goes to zero. Finally compared to frequency domain methods the transient simulations needed to obtain the necessary parameters are simpler.","PeriodicalId":118637,"journal":{"name":"2008 51st Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparisons of phase noise models of CMOS ring oscillators\",\"authors\":\"B. Leung\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MWSCAS.2008.4616757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Comparisons of phase noise models based on time domain models and frequency domain models are presented. It is shown that time domain approach by this author, based on conventional time scaling and that incorporates multiple threshold crossing phenomenon, reflects the physical mechanism better. Moreover its phase noise expression does not blow up as offset frequency goes to zero. Finally compared to frequency domain methods the transient simulations needed to obtain the necessary parameters are simpler.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 51st Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 51st Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MWSCAS.2008.4616757\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 51st Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MWSCAS.2008.4616757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparisons of phase noise models of CMOS ring oscillators
Comparisons of phase noise models based on time domain models and frequency domain models are presented. It is shown that time domain approach by this author, based on conventional time scaling and that incorporates multiple threshold crossing phenomenon, reflects the physical mechanism better. Moreover its phase noise expression does not blow up as offset frequency goes to zero. Finally compared to frequency domain methods the transient simulations needed to obtain the necessary parameters are simpler.