{"title":"货币政策、不确定性和土耳其国内冲击对资本流动的传导","authors":"I. Sifat","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3468244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports findings on multiple important phenomena in capital flow literature: internal and external shock transmission to foreign direct investment and foreign portfolio investment. Operating on Turkey as a case study, I disaggregate quarterly gross capital inflows (FDI and FPI) and examine their time-varying responses to shocks in advanced economies' monetary policy and uncertainty surrounding it, Central Bank of Turkey's monetary policy, and several key domestic macroeconomic determinants. To this end, I employ a recently developed Structural Vector Autoregression technique that uses a data-driven non-Gaussian approach and find that FPI inflows are considerably more sensitive to permanent unexpected monetary policy shocks originating both at home and abroad. Complementary results from uncertainty metrics indicate-to varying extents-that Turkey is a beneficiary of capital flow amidst heightened policy tension in the US. I also visit the push-vs.-pull debate in capital flow literature via Forecast Error Variance Decomposition and discover that Turkey falls decisively in the pull category. The Turkey-specific indicators most crucial in attracting foreign capital are the performance of the currency and CBRT's policy positioning. Lastly, using signal-processing techniques in the time-frequency domain, I report that higher FPI inflows have generally led FDI inflows in times of global economic turbulence, but that phenomenon is undergoing a reversal in the recent past.","PeriodicalId":111923,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Monetary Policy (Topic)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monetary Policy, Uncertainty, and Domestic Shock Transmission to Capital Flow in Turkey\",\"authors\":\"I. Sifat\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3468244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper reports findings on multiple important phenomena in capital flow literature: internal and external shock transmission to foreign direct investment and foreign portfolio investment. Operating on Turkey as a case study, I disaggregate quarterly gross capital inflows (FDI and FPI) and examine their time-varying responses to shocks in advanced economies' monetary policy and uncertainty surrounding it, Central Bank of Turkey's monetary policy, and several key domestic macroeconomic determinants. To this end, I employ a recently developed Structural Vector Autoregression technique that uses a data-driven non-Gaussian approach and find that FPI inflows are considerably more sensitive to permanent unexpected monetary policy shocks originating both at home and abroad. Complementary results from uncertainty metrics indicate-to varying extents-that Turkey is a beneficiary of capital flow amidst heightened policy tension in the US. I also visit the push-vs.-pull debate in capital flow literature via Forecast Error Variance Decomposition and discover that Turkey falls decisively in the pull category. The Turkey-specific indicators most crucial in attracting foreign capital are the performance of the currency and CBRT's policy positioning. Lastly, using signal-processing techniques in the time-frequency domain, I report that higher FPI inflows have generally led FDI inflows in times of global economic turbulence, but that phenomenon is undergoing a reversal in the recent past.\",\"PeriodicalId\":111923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Monetary Policy (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Monetary Policy (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3468244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Monetary Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3468244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Monetary Policy, Uncertainty, and Domestic Shock Transmission to Capital Flow in Turkey
This paper reports findings on multiple important phenomena in capital flow literature: internal and external shock transmission to foreign direct investment and foreign portfolio investment. Operating on Turkey as a case study, I disaggregate quarterly gross capital inflows (FDI and FPI) and examine their time-varying responses to shocks in advanced economies' monetary policy and uncertainty surrounding it, Central Bank of Turkey's monetary policy, and several key domestic macroeconomic determinants. To this end, I employ a recently developed Structural Vector Autoregression technique that uses a data-driven non-Gaussian approach and find that FPI inflows are considerably more sensitive to permanent unexpected monetary policy shocks originating both at home and abroad. Complementary results from uncertainty metrics indicate-to varying extents-that Turkey is a beneficiary of capital flow amidst heightened policy tension in the US. I also visit the push-vs.-pull debate in capital flow literature via Forecast Error Variance Decomposition and discover that Turkey falls decisively in the pull category. The Turkey-specific indicators most crucial in attracting foreign capital are the performance of the currency and CBRT's policy positioning. Lastly, using signal-processing techniques in the time-frequency domain, I report that higher FPI inflows have generally led FDI inflows in times of global economic turbulence, but that phenomenon is undergoing a reversal in the recent past.