竞争性投标在初始证明业务市场中的作用

J. Bedard, Michael L. Ettredge, Karla M. Zehms
{"title":"竞争性投标在初始证明业务市场中的作用","authors":"J. Bedard, Michael L. Ettredge, Karla M. Zehms","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.197868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the effects of competitive bidding on clients' and service providers' decisions. We examine the determinants of clients' decisions to choose private negotiations (i.e., only one bidder) versus competitive bidding (i.e., multiple bidders) and the effect of that choice on the bidding firm's engagement planning and bid pricing decisions. The data used to conduct this examination include actual evaluations of prospective clients for whom the participating firm's personnel decided to issue an engagement bid during 1997 and 1998. Our findings reveal various cost-benefit tradeoffs involved in clients' decisions to choose private negotiations versus competitive bidding. Results also show that competitive bidding is associated with an increase in planned engagement effort, an increase in the use of quality-enhancing personnel allocations, and reduced fee rates.","PeriodicalId":180033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Abstracts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Competitive Bidding in the Market for Initial Attest Engagements\",\"authors\":\"J. Bedard, Michael L. Ettredge, Karla M. Zehms\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.197868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the effects of competitive bidding on clients' and service providers' decisions. We examine the determinants of clients' decisions to choose private negotiations (i.e., only one bidder) versus competitive bidding (i.e., multiple bidders) and the effect of that choice on the bidding firm's engagement planning and bid pricing decisions. The data used to conduct this examination include actual evaluations of prospective clients for whom the participating firm's personnel decided to issue an engagement bid during 1997 and 1998. Our findings reveal various cost-benefit tradeoffs involved in clients' decisions to choose private negotiations versus competitive bidding. Results also show that competitive bidding is associated with an increase in planned engagement effort, an increase in the use of quality-enhancing personnel allocations, and reduced fee rates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":180033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting Abstracts\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting Abstracts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.197868\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.197868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文研究了竞争性投标对客户和服务提供商决策的影响。我们研究了客户选择私下谈判(即只有一个投标人)还是竞争性招标(即多个投标人)的决定因素,以及这种选择对投标公司的业务规划和投标定价决策的影响。用于进行这项审查的数据包括对参与公司人员决定在1997年和1998年向其发出业务投标书的潜在客户的实际评估。我们的研究结果揭示了客户在选择私人谈判还是竞争性投标时所涉及的各种成本效益权衡。结果还表明,竞争性投标与增加计划的业务工作、增加使用提高质量的人员分配以及降低费率有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Competitive Bidding in the Market for Initial Attest Engagements
This paper investigates the effects of competitive bidding on clients' and service providers' decisions. We examine the determinants of clients' decisions to choose private negotiations (i.e., only one bidder) versus competitive bidding (i.e., multiple bidders) and the effect of that choice on the bidding firm's engagement planning and bid pricing decisions. The data used to conduct this examination include actual evaluations of prospective clients for whom the participating firm's personnel decided to issue an engagement bid during 1997 and 1998. Our findings reveal various cost-benefit tradeoffs involved in clients' decisions to choose private negotiations versus competitive bidding. Results also show that competitive bidding is associated with an increase in planned engagement effort, an increase in the use of quality-enhancing personnel allocations, and reduced fee rates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信