J. Hung, A. Roos, Erik Kadesjö, D. McAllister, Anoop S. V. Shah, A. Anand, F. Strachan, K. Fox, N. Mills, M. Holzmann, A. Chapman
{"title":"grace 2.0评分在1型和2型心肌梗死患者中的表现","authors":"J. Hung, A. Roos, Erik Kadesjö, D. McAllister, Anoop S. V. Shah, A. Anand, F. Strachan, K. Fox, N. Mills, M. Holzmann, A. Chapman","doi":"10.1136/HEARTJNL-2020-BCS.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score was developed to evaluate risk in patients with myocardial infarction. However, its performance in type 2 myocardial infarction is uncertain. Methods In two cohorts of consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome from ten hospitals in Scotland (n=48,282) and a tertiary care hospital in Sweden (n=22,589), we calculated the GRACE 2.0 score to estimate death at one year. Discrimination was evaluated by the area under the receiver-operator-curve (AUC), and compared for those with an adjudicated diagnosis of type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction using DeLong’s test. Results Type 1 myocardial infarction was diagnosed in 4,981 (10%) and 1,080 (5%) patients in Scotland and Sweden, respectively. At one year, 720 (15%) and 112 (10%) patients died with an AUC for the GRACE score of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82 to 0.85) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.89). Type 2 myocardial infarction occurred in 1,121 (2%) and 247 (1%) patients in Scotland and Sweden respectively, with 258 (23%) and 57 (23%) deaths at one year. The AUC was 0.73 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.77) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.81) in type 2 myocardial infarction, which was lower than for type 1 myocardial infarction in both cohorts (P Conclusions The GRACE score provided good discrimination for all-cause death at one year in patients with type 1 myocardial infarction, and moderate discrimination for those with type 2 myocardial infarction. Conflict of Interest None","PeriodicalId":102313,"journal":{"name":"Acute Coronary Syndromes & Interventional Cardiology","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"23 Performance of the grace 2.0 score in patients with type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction\",\"authors\":\"J. Hung, A. Roos, Erik Kadesjö, D. McAllister, Anoop S. V. Shah, A. Anand, F. Strachan, K. Fox, N. Mills, M. Holzmann, A. Chapman\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/HEARTJNL-2020-BCS.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score was developed to evaluate risk in patients with myocardial infarction. However, its performance in type 2 myocardial infarction is uncertain. Methods In two cohorts of consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome from ten hospitals in Scotland (n=48,282) and a tertiary care hospital in Sweden (n=22,589), we calculated the GRACE 2.0 score to estimate death at one year. Discrimination was evaluated by the area under the receiver-operator-curve (AUC), and compared for those with an adjudicated diagnosis of type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction using DeLong’s test. Results Type 1 myocardial infarction was diagnosed in 4,981 (10%) and 1,080 (5%) patients in Scotland and Sweden, respectively. At one year, 720 (15%) and 112 (10%) patients died with an AUC for the GRACE score of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82 to 0.85) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.89). Type 2 myocardial infarction occurred in 1,121 (2%) and 247 (1%) patients in Scotland and Sweden respectively, with 258 (23%) and 57 (23%) deaths at one year. The AUC was 0.73 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.77) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.81) in type 2 myocardial infarction, which was lower than for type 1 myocardial infarction in both cohorts (P Conclusions The GRACE score provided good discrimination for all-cause death at one year in patients with type 1 myocardial infarction, and moderate discrimination for those with type 2 myocardial infarction. Conflict of Interest None\",\"PeriodicalId\":102313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acute Coronary Syndromes & Interventional Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acute Coronary Syndromes & Interventional Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/HEARTJNL-2020-BCS.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Coronary Syndromes & Interventional Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/HEARTJNL-2020-BCS.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
急性冠状动脉事件全球登记(GRACE)评分用于评估心肌梗死患者的风险。然而,其在2型心肌梗死中的表现尚不确定。方法对来自苏格兰10家医院(n= 48282)和瑞典一家三级医院(n= 22589)的连续疑似急性冠脉综合征患者进行两组队列研究,计算GRACE 2.0评分来估计一年内的死亡率。通过接受者-操作者曲线下面积(AUC)来评估鉴别性,并使用DeLong试验对确诊为1型和2型心肌梗死的患者进行比较。结果苏格兰和瑞典分别有4981例(10%)和1080例(5%)患者被诊断为1型心肌梗死。一年后,720例(15%)和112例(10%)患者死亡,GRACE评分的AUC分别为0.83(95%可信区间[CI] 0.82至0.85)和0.85 (95% CI 0.81至0.89)。苏格兰和瑞典分别有1121例(2%)和247例(1%)患者发生2型心肌梗死,其中258例(23%)和57例(23%)在一年内死亡。2型心肌梗死的AUC分别为0.73 (95% CI 0.70 ~ 0.77)和0.73 (95% CI 0.66 ~ 0.81),在两个队列中均低于1型心肌梗死(P结论GRACE评分对1型心肌梗死患者一年内全因死亡具有良好的判别能力,对2型心肌梗死患者具有中等的判别能力。利益冲突无
23 Performance of the grace 2.0 score in patients with type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction
Introduction The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score was developed to evaluate risk in patients with myocardial infarction. However, its performance in type 2 myocardial infarction is uncertain. Methods In two cohorts of consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome from ten hospitals in Scotland (n=48,282) and a tertiary care hospital in Sweden (n=22,589), we calculated the GRACE 2.0 score to estimate death at one year. Discrimination was evaluated by the area under the receiver-operator-curve (AUC), and compared for those with an adjudicated diagnosis of type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction using DeLong’s test. Results Type 1 myocardial infarction was diagnosed in 4,981 (10%) and 1,080 (5%) patients in Scotland and Sweden, respectively. At one year, 720 (15%) and 112 (10%) patients died with an AUC for the GRACE score of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82 to 0.85) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.89). Type 2 myocardial infarction occurred in 1,121 (2%) and 247 (1%) patients in Scotland and Sweden respectively, with 258 (23%) and 57 (23%) deaths at one year. The AUC was 0.73 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.77) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.81) in type 2 myocardial infarction, which was lower than for type 1 myocardial infarction in both cohorts (P Conclusions The GRACE score provided good discrimination for all-cause death at one year in patients with type 1 myocardial infarction, and moderate discrimination for those with type 2 myocardial infarction. Conflict of Interest None