通过增强现实视图评估三种用于选择和注释物理对象的输入技术

B. Thomas
{"title":"通过增强现实视图评估三种用于选择和注释物理对象的输入技术","authors":"B. Thomas","doi":"10.1109/ISMAR.2006.297791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents results from a study into the usability issues of two tasks (selection and annotation of a physical object) for users operating mobile augmented reality systems. The study compared the following three different modes of cursor manipulation: a handheld mouse, a head cursor, and an image-plane vision-tracked device. The selection task was evaluated based on number of mouse button clicks, completion time, and a subjective survey. The annotation task was evaluated based on accuracy of the annotation, completion time, and a subjective survey.","PeriodicalId":332844,"journal":{"name":"2006 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of three input techniques for selection and annotation of physical objects through an augmented reality view\",\"authors\":\"B. Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISMAR.2006.297791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents results from a study into the usability issues of two tasks (selection and annotation of a physical object) for users operating mobile augmented reality systems. The study compared the following three different modes of cursor manipulation: a handheld mouse, a head cursor, and an image-plane vision-tracked device. The selection task was evaluated based on number of mouse button clicks, completion time, and a subjective survey. The annotation task was evaluated based on accuracy of the annotation, completion time, and a subjective survey.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2006 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2006 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2006.297791\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2006.297791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

本文介绍了对用户操作移动增强现实系统的两个任务(物理对象的选择和注释)的可用性问题的研究结果。该研究比较了以下三种不同的光标操作模式:手持鼠标、头部光标和图像平面视觉跟踪设备。选择任务是根据鼠标点击次数、完成时间和主观调查来评估的。根据标注的准确性、完成时间和主观调查对标注任务进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of three input techniques for selection and annotation of physical objects through an augmented reality view
This paper presents results from a study into the usability issues of two tasks (selection and annotation of a physical object) for users operating mobile augmented reality systems. The study compared the following three different modes of cursor manipulation: a handheld mouse, a head cursor, and an image-plane vision-tracked device. The selection task was evaluated based on number of mouse button clicks, completion time, and a subjective survey. The annotation task was evaluated based on accuracy of the annotation, completion time, and a subjective survey.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信