{"title":"通过增强现实视图评估三种用于选择和注释物理对象的输入技术","authors":"B. Thomas","doi":"10.1109/ISMAR.2006.297791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents results from a study into the usability issues of two tasks (selection and annotation of a physical object) for users operating mobile augmented reality systems. The study compared the following three different modes of cursor manipulation: a handheld mouse, a head cursor, and an image-plane vision-tracked device. The selection task was evaluated based on number of mouse button clicks, completion time, and a subjective survey. The annotation task was evaluated based on accuracy of the annotation, completion time, and a subjective survey.","PeriodicalId":332844,"journal":{"name":"2006 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of three input techniques for selection and annotation of physical objects through an augmented reality view\",\"authors\":\"B. Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISMAR.2006.297791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents results from a study into the usability issues of two tasks (selection and annotation of a physical object) for users operating mobile augmented reality systems. The study compared the following three different modes of cursor manipulation: a handheld mouse, a head cursor, and an image-plane vision-tracked device. The selection task was evaluated based on number of mouse button clicks, completion time, and a subjective survey. The annotation task was evaluated based on accuracy of the annotation, completion time, and a subjective survey.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2006 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2006 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2006.297791\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2006.297791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of three input techniques for selection and annotation of physical objects through an augmented reality view
This paper presents results from a study into the usability issues of two tasks (selection and annotation of a physical object) for users operating mobile augmented reality systems. The study compared the following three different modes of cursor manipulation: a handheld mouse, a head cursor, and an image-plane vision-tracked device. The selection task was evaluated based on number of mouse button clicks, completion time, and a subjective survey. The annotation task was evaluated based on accuracy of the annotation, completion time, and a subjective survey.