建立一个不使用唯一个人标识符的国家围产期数据库

R. Schnell, C. Borgs
{"title":"建立一个不使用唯一个人标识符的国家围产期数据库","authors":"R. Schnell, C. Borgs","doi":"10.1109/ICDMW.2015.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To assess the quality of hospital care, national databases of standard medical procedures are common. A widely known example are national databases of births. If unique personal identification numbers are available (as in Scandinavian countries), the construction of such databases is trivial from a computational point of view. However, due to privacy legislation, such identifiers are not available in all countries. Given such constraints, the construction of a national perinatal database has to rely on other patient identifiers, such as names and dates of birth. These kind of identifiers are prone to errors. Furthermore, some jurisdictions require the encryption of personal identifiers. The resulting problem is therefore an example of Privacy Preserving Record Linkage (PPRL). This contribution describes the design considerations for a national perinatal database using data of about 600,000 births in about 1,000 hospitals. Based on simulations, recommendations for parameter settings of Bloom filter based PPRL are given for this real world application.","PeriodicalId":192888,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop (ICDMW)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building a National Perinatal Data Base without the Use of Unique Personal Identifiers\",\"authors\":\"R. Schnell, C. Borgs\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDMW.2015.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To assess the quality of hospital care, national databases of standard medical procedures are common. A widely known example are national databases of births. If unique personal identification numbers are available (as in Scandinavian countries), the construction of such databases is trivial from a computational point of view. However, due to privacy legislation, such identifiers are not available in all countries. Given such constraints, the construction of a national perinatal database has to rely on other patient identifiers, such as names and dates of birth. These kind of identifiers are prone to errors. Furthermore, some jurisdictions require the encryption of personal identifiers. The resulting problem is therefore an example of Privacy Preserving Record Linkage (PPRL). This contribution describes the design considerations for a national perinatal database using data of about 600,000 births in about 1,000 hospitals. Based on simulations, recommendations for parameter settings of Bloom filter based PPRL are given for this real world application.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop (ICDMW)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop (ICDMW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDMW.2015.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop (ICDMW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDMW.2015.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

为了评估医院护理的质量,标准医疗程序的国家数据库是常见的。一个广为人知的例子是国家出生数据库。如果可以获得唯一的个人识别号码(如斯堪的纳维亚国家),那么从计算的角度来看,构建这样的数据库是微不足道的。然而,由于隐私立法的原因,并非所有国家都可以使用这种标识符。鉴于这些限制,国家围产期数据库的建设必须依赖于其他患者标识符,如姓名和出生日期。这类标识符容易出错。此外,一些司法管辖区要求对个人标识符进行加密。由此产生的问题是隐私保护记录链接(PPRL)的一个例子。这篇文章描述了使用约1 000家医院约60万名新生儿的数据建立全国围产期数据库的设计考虑。在仿真的基础上,给出了基于布隆滤波器的PPRL的参数设置建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Building a National Perinatal Data Base without the Use of Unique Personal Identifiers
To assess the quality of hospital care, national databases of standard medical procedures are common. A widely known example are national databases of births. If unique personal identification numbers are available (as in Scandinavian countries), the construction of such databases is trivial from a computational point of view. However, due to privacy legislation, such identifiers are not available in all countries. Given such constraints, the construction of a national perinatal database has to rely on other patient identifiers, such as names and dates of birth. These kind of identifiers are prone to errors. Furthermore, some jurisdictions require the encryption of personal identifiers. The resulting problem is therefore an example of Privacy Preserving Record Linkage (PPRL). This contribution describes the design considerations for a national perinatal database using data of about 600,000 births in about 1,000 hospitals. Based on simulations, recommendations for parameter settings of Bloom filter based PPRL are given for this real world application.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信