英语在往返波兰的伊拉斯谟文化交流中作为反思性判断的组成部分

Anna Odrowąż-Coates, Anna Perkowska-Klejman
{"title":"英语在往返波兰的伊拉斯谟文化交流中作为反思性判断的组成部分","authors":"Anna Odrowąż-Coates, Anna Perkowska-Klejman","doi":"10.15804/em.2021.01.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": In the empirical study of intercultural exchange presented in this pa-per, we assessed Erasmus students for knowledge of English as a foreign language (EFL) and their level of reflective judgement, to test for correlation between the two variables. The basic theoretical framing was derived from King and Kitchener’s (1994) reflective judgment model (RJM), based on 3 different levels of reflectivity, connected to progressive cognitive development of adults: pre-reflective, quasi-reflective and reflective. The results of the study show that the students displayed high levels of reflective judgment and importantly, we found a correlation between their standard of English and their level of reflectivity. The ability to communicate in English is a prerequisite to participation in the Erasmus programme, therefore it was expected that the students would score well for English knowledge. However, the results of the study suggest that being competent in the use of English as a foreign language may be a predictor of higher reflectivity amongst students in higher education. This creates a controversial pedagogical implication suggesting that learning English as a foreign language to a high standard fuels reflectivity. no connection between level of reflective judgement and previous studies or stays abroad as an adult and no connection between the level of the second foreign language and the reflective judgement level. However, we found connection between EFL skills and reflective judgment levels. There was a weak statistical correlation between level of reflective judgement and having been abroad as a child, and a stronger connection between level of reflective judgement and the level of English as a foreign language. The results were indicative of tendency to link EFL skills with reflective judgement and vice versa.","PeriodicalId":385104,"journal":{"name":"Edukacja Międzykulturowa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The English language as a reflective judgement component in the intercultural Erasmus exchange to and from Poland\",\"authors\":\"Anna Odrowąż-Coates, Anna Perkowska-Klejman\",\"doi\":\"10.15804/em.2021.01.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": In the empirical study of intercultural exchange presented in this pa-per, we assessed Erasmus students for knowledge of English as a foreign language (EFL) and their level of reflective judgement, to test for correlation between the two variables. The basic theoretical framing was derived from King and Kitchener’s (1994) reflective judgment model (RJM), based on 3 different levels of reflectivity, connected to progressive cognitive development of adults: pre-reflective, quasi-reflective and reflective. The results of the study show that the students displayed high levels of reflective judgment and importantly, we found a correlation between their standard of English and their level of reflectivity. The ability to communicate in English is a prerequisite to participation in the Erasmus programme, therefore it was expected that the students would score well for English knowledge. However, the results of the study suggest that being competent in the use of English as a foreign language may be a predictor of higher reflectivity amongst students in higher education. This creates a controversial pedagogical implication suggesting that learning English as a foreign language to a high standard fuels reflectivity. no connection between level of reflective judgement and previous studies or stays abroad as an adult and no connection between the level of the second foreign language and the reflective judgement level. However, we found connection between EFL skills and reflective judgment levels. There was a weak statistical correlation between level of reflective judgement and having been abroad as a child, and a stronger connection between level of reflective judgement and the level of English as a foreign language. The results were indicative of tendency to link EFL skills with reflective judgement and vice versa.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Edukacja Międzykulturowa\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Edukacja Międzykulturowa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15804/em.2021.01.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edukacja Międzykulturowa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15804/em.2021.01.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文提出的跨文化交流实证研究中,我们评估了伊拉斯谟学生的英语作为外语(EFL)知识和他们的反思判断水平,以检验这两个变量之间的相关性。基本理论框架来源于King和Kitchener(1994)的反思判断模型(RJM),该模型基于与成人认知发展相关的3个不同的反射率水平:前反思、准反思和反思。研究结果表明,学生表现出高水平的反思性判断,重要的是,我们发现他们的英语水平和反思性水平之间存在相关性。用英语交流的能力是参加伊拉斯谟计划的先决条件,因此期望学生们在英语知识方面取得好成绩。然而,研究结果表明,在高等教育学生中,熟练使用英语作为外语可能预示着更高的反射率。这就产生了一个有争议的教学暗示,即把英语作为外语学习到高标准会助长反射率。反思性判断水平与以前的学习或成年后在国外的停留没有关系,第二外语水平与反思性判断水平没有关系。然而,我们发现英语技能和反思判断水平之间存在联系。反思性判断水平与儿童时期出国经历之间存在微弱的统计相关性,而反思性判断水平与英语作为外语的水平之间存在更强的联系。结果表明,学生倾向于将英语技能与反思性判断联系起来,反之亦然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The English language as a reflective judgement component in the intercultural Erasmus exchange to and from Poland
: In the empirical study of intercultural exchange presented in this pa-per, we assessed Erasmus students for knowledge of English as a foreign language (EFL) and their level of reflective judgement, to test for correlation between the two variables. The basic theoretical framing was derived from King and Kitchener’s (1994) reflective judgment model (RJM), based on 3 different levels of reflectivity, connected to progressive cognitive development of adults: pre-reflective, quasi-reflective and reflective. The results of the study show that the students displayed high levels of reflective judgment and importantly, we found a correlation between their standard of English and their level of reflectivity. The ability to communicate in English is a prerequisite to participation in the Erasmus programme, therefore it was expected that the students would score well for English knowledge. However, the results of the study suggest that being competent in the use of English as a foreign language may be a predictor of higher reflectivity amongst students in higher education. This creates a controversial pedagogical implication suggesting that learning English as a foreign language to a high standard fuels reflectivity. no connection between level of reflective judgement and previous studies or stays abroad as an adult and no connection between the level of the second foreign language and the reflective judgement level. However, we found connection between EFL skills and reflective judgment levels. There was a weak statistical correlation between level of reflective judgement and having been abroad as a child, and a stronger connection between level of reflective judgement and the level of English as a foreign language. The results were indicative of tendency to link EFL skills with reflective judgement and vice versa.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信