委托代理模型中的常识与道德风险

T. Matsuhisa
{"title":"委托代理模型中的常识与道德风险","authors":"T. Matsuhisa","doi":"10.1109/ISMOT.2012.6679503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article re-examines a principal-agent model with moral hazard from the epistemic point of view. It highlights hidden conditions for a possible resolution of the moral hazard between the principal and the agents. We show that the moral hazard in the principal agent model under uncertainty will not be appeared if the principal and agents could share fully information on their expected marginal costs in the following two cases: first they commonly known the marginal expected costs and secondly they communicate the costs as long run.","PeriodicalId":329450,"journal":{"name":"2012 International Symposium on Management of Technology (ISMOT)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Common-knowledge and moral hazard in principal-agent model\",\"authors\":\"T. Matsuhisa\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISMOT.2012.6679503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article re-examines a principal-agent model with moral hazard from the epistemic point of view. It highlights hidden conditions for a possible resolution of the moral hazard between the principal and the agents. We show that the moral hazard in the principal agent model under uncertainty will not be appeared if the principal and agents could share fully information on their expected marginal costs in the following two cases: first they commonly known the marginal expected costs and secondly they communicate the costs as long run.\",\"PeriodicalId\":329450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 International Symposium on Management of Technology (ISMOT)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 International Symposium on Management of Technology (ISMOT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMOT.2012.6679503\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 International Symposium on Management of Technology (ISMOT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMOT.2012.6679503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从认识论的角度重新审视了具有道德风险的委托-代理模型。它突出了可能解决委托人和代理人之间道德风险的隐藏条件。研究表明,在以下两种情况下,如果委托人和代理人能够充分分享期望边际成本的信息,则不确定委托代理模型中的道德风险就不会出现:一是他们通常知道边际预期成本,二是他们作为长期成本进行沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Common-knowledge and moral hazard in principal-agent model
This article re-examines a principal-agent model with moral hazard from the epistemic point of view. It highlights hidden conditions for a possible resolution of the moral hazard between the principal and the agents. We show that the moral hazard in the principal agent model under uncertainty will not be appeared if the principal and agents could share fully information on their expected marginal costs in the following two cases: first they commonly known the marginal expected costs and secondly they communicate the costs as long run.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信