尤科斯奖中的清洁原则:对帕特里克·邓贝里的回应

Ori Pomson
{"title":"尤科斯奖中的清洁原则:对帕特里克·邓贝里的回应","authors":"Ori Pomson","doi":"10.1163/22119000-12340056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is a response to an article published in this Journal by Professor Patrick Dumberry, criticising the Yukos tribunal’s conclusion that the clean hands doctrine does not constitute a general principle of law and is not a bar to an investor’s claim. Dumberry submits that strong arguments exist for considering the clean hands doctrine a general principle of law, and that tribunals, by barring claims concerning investments made contrary to host states’ laws, have been applying the doctrine. The present article contends that the Yukos tribunal is quite accurate. First, it submits that there are different forms of the clean hands doctrine, not all of which have received much support in international jurisprudence. Second, it argues that, in light of contemporary law in certain municipal legal systems, the different forms of the clean hands doctrine seemingly do not constitute general principles of law.","PeriodicalId":163787,"journal":{"name":"The journal of world investment and trade","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Clean Hands Doctrine in the Yukos Awards: A Response to Patrick Dumberry\",\"authors\":\"Ori Pomson\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22119000-12340056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is a response to an article published in this Journal by Professor Patrick Dumberry, criticising the Yukos tribunal’s conclusion that the clean hands doctrine does not constitute a general principle of law and is not a bar to an investor’s claim. Dumberry submits that strong arguments exist for considering the clean hands doctrine a general principle of law, and that tribunals, by barring claims concerning investments made contrary to host states’ laws, have been applying the doctrine. The present article contends that the Yukos tribunal is quite accurate. First, it submits that there are different forms of the clean hands doctrine, not all of which have received much support in international jurisprudence. Second, it argues that, in light of contemporary law in certain municipal legal systems, the different forms of the clean hands doctrine seemingly do not constitute general principles of law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":163787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of world investment and trade\",\"volume\":\"133 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of world investment and trade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of world investment and trade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇文章是对Patrick Dumberry教授发表在《华尔街日报》上的一篇文章的回应,该文章批评了尤科斯法庭的结论,即干净的手原则不构成一般法律原则,也不是投资者索赔的障碍。Dumberry提出,将“干净的手”原则视为一般法律原则存在强有力的论据,法庭通过禁止与东道国法律相悖的投资有关的索赔,一直在适用该原则。本文认为,尤科斯的裁决是相当准确的。第一,它认为,廉洁原则有不同的形式,并不是所有的形式都得到国际法律界的大力支持。其次,本文认为,根据某些地方法系的当代法律,“清白之手”原则的不同形式似乎并不构成一般的法律原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Clean Hands Doctrine in the Yukos Awards: A Response to Patrick Dumberry
This article is a response to an article published in this Journal by Professor Patrick Dumberry, criticising the Yukos tribunal’s conclusion that the clean hands doctrine does not constitute a general principle of law and is not a bar to an investor’s claim. Dumberry submits that strong arguments exist for considering the clean hands doctrine a general principle of law, and that tribunals, by barring claims concerning investments made contrary to host states’ laws, have been applying the doctrine. The present article contends that the Yukos tribunal is quite accurate. First, it submits that there are different forms of the clean hands doctrine, not all of which have received much support in international jurisprudence. Second, it argues that, in light of contemporary law in certain municipal legal systems, the different forms of the clean hands doctrine seemingly do not constitute general principles of law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信