Andreas Oberprantacher
{"title":"Unió sagrada: zones frontereres europees qüestionades","authors":"Andreas Oberprantacher","doi":"10.7238/JOC.V5I2.1937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Especially since the creation of the Schengen Area (1985; 1995; 2005), the establishment of the European agency Frontex in October 2004 and the successive implementation of integrated border patrol missions, the European Union and allied states manifests itself to irregular migrants as a maneuverable body of relatively loosely interrelated, treacherous, frontier zones . In consideration of the current trend to diffuse two major elements of the liberal rule-of-law, that is, jurisdiction and accountability , also as a result of the European Union’s Integrated Border Management, this article sets out to explore a variety of options to make such zones of post-Westphalian governmentality public, and to engage with the passion for democracy other than in a managerial sense. More specifically, this article outlines prevalent elements of Europe’s governmental operations in frontier zones and then looks at the question: what acts of dissent are becoming visible that not only cut through former national borders, but also traverse and subvert frontier zones while exposing chances for political association and responsiveness that are not those legitimated by the liberal democratic state? In order to exemplify such acts of dissent, this article refers to the contemporary Refugee Protest Camp Vienna movement, to the Forensic Architecture research project, and also to the Hotel Gelem artistic project. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate and argue in favor of the different possibilities of challenging the increasing institution of European frontier zones by waging acts of dissent that are elicitive.","PeriodicalId":183832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Conflictology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Conflictology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7238/JOC.V5I2.1937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

特别是自1985年申根区成立以来;1995;2005年)、2004年10月欧洲边境管理局(Frontex)的成立以及综合边境巡逻任务的连续实施,欧盟及其盟国向非正规移民展示了自己是一个相互关联相对松散、危险的边境地区的机动机构。考虑到目前自由法治的两个主要元素,即管辖权和问责制的扩散趋势,也是欧盟综合边境管理的结果,本文着手探索各种选择,使这些后威斯特伐利亚治理区域公开,并参与对民主的热情,而不是在管理意义上。更具体地说,本文概述了欧洲政府在边境地区运作的普遍因素,然后着眼于这个问题:哪些不同意见的行为变得越来越明显,不仅跨越了以前的国家边界,而且穿越和颠覆了边境地区,同时暴露了政治联合和回应的机会,而这些都不是自由民主国家所认可的?为了举例说明这种不同意见的行为,本文参考了当代难民抗议营地维也纳运动,法医建筑研究项目,以及酒店Gelem艺术项目。本文的目的是为了说明和论证通过发动有争议的不同行为来挑战日益增长的欧洲边境地区制度的不同可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unió sagrada: zones frontereres europees qüestionades
Especially since the creation of the Schengen Area (1985; 1995; 2005), the establishment of the European agency Frontex in October 2004 and the successive implementation of integrated border patrol missions, the European Union and allied states manifests itself to irregular migrants as a maneuverable body of relatively loosely interrelated, treacherous, frontier zones . In consideration of the current trend to diffuse two major elements of the liberal rule-of-law, that is, jurisdiction and accountability , also as a result of the European Union’s Integrated Border Management, this article sets out to explore a variety of options to make such zones of post-Westphalian governmentality public, and to engage with the passion for democracy other than in a managerial sense. More specifically, this article outlines prevalent elements of Europe’s governmental operations in frontier zones and then looks at the question: what acts of dissent are becoming visible that not only cut through former national borders, but also traverse and subvert frontier zones while exposing chances for political association and responsiveness that are not those legitimated by the liberal democratic state? In order to exemplify such acts of dissent, this article refers to the contemporary Refugee Protest Camp Vienna movement, to the Forensic Architecture research project, and also to the Hotel Gelem artistic project. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate and argue in favor of the different possibilities of challenging the increasing institution of European frontier zones by waging acts of dissent that are elicitive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信