让我看看学校健康的成果

Sharon Yearous
{"title":"让我看看学校健康的成果","authors":"Sharon Yearous","doi":"10.1177/1942602X08322154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Katie is a 16-year-old female who presents to the School Nurse’s office frequently—often at the verge of tears. Her respiratory rate is rapid, she has poor eye contact, and she is visibly upset. As the School Nurse, you have known Katie for five years and recall her history of generalized anxiety. Knowing this information, what outcome do you want to help Katie achieve? Most likely your outcome is to help Katie improve her coping skills and manage her anxiety, but what interventions can you do with Katie that will help her achieve this outcome? Although much of school nursing appears to focus on interventions (what we do to help students like Katie), it is essential for School Nurses to identify the desired outcome first, then implement interventions to achieve that outcome, and finally measure that outcome in situations such as Katie’s to see if the intervention was successful. Outcomes are viewed as measures of effectiveness in health care and education. It is challenging for School Nurses to monitor health outcomes of students, families, and communities within the educational setting, where the focus is on educational outcomes. Anecdotally, School Nurses can describe countless positive outcomes from their interactions with students, faculty, and families. Unfortunately, the ability to demonstrate measurement of school nursing outcomes in a consistent manner is not so easy. Several research studies recently identified the link between interventions and outcomes in the school setting. These articles provide an excellent starting point for discussion and further development of outcome measurements by School Nurses (Maughan, 2003; Selekman & Guilday, 2003; Weismuller, Grasska, Alexander, White, & Kramer, 2007). With No Child Left Behind (U.S. Department of Education, 2002), outcomes in education have become well recognized by the public and the education system. Educational outcomes can be simply defined as “academic success” and have been most recently defined through No Child Left Behind classifications as proficient or nonproficient (U.S. Department of Education, 2002). Standardized tests provide the outcome measurements that allow the educational system to track a student’s progress or need for further assistance. The use of teaching methods, education’s interventions, for groups of students at similar educational and developmental levels enables students to learn and apply information taught in the classroom that is then documented by these standardized tests. School nursing outcomes and their measurement are in initial stages of development and use and are more difficult to define. The role of a School Nurse is often described with a taskoriented framework (Selekman & Guilday, 2003). Consequently, many School Nurses are evaluated on the basis of the frequency of the tasks performed instead of the student’s or population’s response to interventions. School nursing practice is based on the nursing process, which was previously known as a fivestep process that included assessment, diagnosis, planning, interventions, and evaluation. Ultimately, to evaluate the effectiveness of a plan of care and the interventions, a nurse needs to identify the anticipated outcomes prior to initiating the plan of care. School Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice (American Nurses Association & NASN, 2005) incorporates a sixth step in the nursing process, so the nursing process is now recognized as assessment, diagnosis, outcome, planning, interventions, and evaluation. The inclusion of an anticipated outcome and how this outcome will be measured before any interventions are initiated is essential to measure the effectiveness of nursing care. Intuitively, School Nurses may think about outcomes they are trying to achieve, but unless there is a consistent documented measurement of outcomes, it is difficult to determine the most effective interventions to reach an outcome. The Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) system (Moorhead, Johnson, Maas, & Swanson, 2008) is a method to incorporate outcomes and outcome measurement into school nursing documentation. Each NOC outcome has a definition with a list of possible indicators used to measure the outcome. When developing a plan of care, the NOC outcome is linked to a nursing diagnosis (NANDA) and the interventions (NIC, or nursing interventions classification) used to reach the outcome. The NOC system is recognized by the American Nurses Association (2006), and the most recent edition of NOC (Moorhead et al., 2008) includes 385 outcomes that incorporate seven different domain areas, including functional health, physical and psychological health, health knowledge, perceived health, family health, and community health. The NOC system uses 5-point Likert-type scales to measure progress toward an expected","PeriodicalId":412278,"journal":{"name":"NASN Newsletter","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Show Me the Outcomes in School Health\",\"authors\":\"Sharon Yearous\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1942602X08322154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Katie is a 16-year-old female who presents to the School Nurse’s office frequently—often at the verge of tears. Her respiratory rate is rapid, she has poor eye contact, and she is visibly upset. As the School Nurse, you have known Katie for five years and recall her history of generalized anxiety. Knowing this information, what outcome do you want to help Katie achieve? Most likely your outcome is to help Katie improve her coping skills and manage her anxiety, but what interventions can you do with Katie that will help her achieve this outcome? Although much of school nursing appears to focus on interventions (what we do to help students like Katie), it is essential for School Nurses to identify the desired outcome first, then implement interventions to achieve that outcome, and finally measure that outcome in situations such as Katie’s to see if the intervention was successful. Outcomes are viewed as measures of effectiveness in health care and education. It is challenging for School Nurses to monitor health outcomes of students, families, and communities within the educational setting, where the focus is on educational outcomes. Anecdotally, School Nurses can describe countless positive outcomes from their interactions with students, faculty, and families. Unfortunately, the ability to demonstrate measurement of school nursing outcomes in a consistent manner is not so easy. Several research studies recently identified the link between interventions and outcomes in the school setting. These articles provide an excellent starting point for discussion and further development of outcome measurements by School Nurses (Maughan, 2003; Selekman & Guilday, 2003; Weismuller, Grasska, Alexander, White, & Kramer, 2007). With No Child Left Behind (U.S. Department of Education, 2002), outcomes in education have become well recognized by the public and the education system. Educational outcomes can be simply defined as “academic success” and have been most recently defined through No Child Left Behind classifications as proficient or nonproficient (U.S. Department of Education, 2002). Standardized tests provide the outcome measurements that allow the educational system to track a student’s progress or need for further assistance. The use of teaching methods, education’s interventions, for groups of students at similar educational and developmental levels enables students to learn and apply information taught in the classroom that is then documented by these standardized tests. School nursing outcomes and their measurement are in initial stages of development and use and are more difficult to define. The role of a School Nurse is often described with a taskoriented framework (Selekman & Guilday, 2003). Consequently, many School Nurses are evaluated on the basis of the frequency of the tasks performed instead of the student’s or population’s response to interventions. School nursing practice is based on the nursing process, which was previously known as a fivestep process that included assessment, diagnosis, planning, interventions, and evaluation. Ultimately, to evaluate the effectiveness of a plan of care and the interventions, a nurse needs to identify the anticipated outcomes prior to initiating the plan of care. School Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice (American Nurses Association & NASN, 2005) incorporates a sixth step in the nursing process, so the nursing process is now recognized as assessment, diagnosis, outcome, planning, interventions, and evaluation. The inclusion of an anticipated outcome and how this outcome will be measured before any interventions are initiated is essential to measure the effectiveness of nursing care. Intuitively, School Nurses may think about outcomes they are trying to achieve, but unless there is a consistent documented measurement of outcomes, it is difficult to determine the most effective interventions to reach an outcome. The Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) system (Moorhead, Johnson, Maas, & Swanson, 2008) is a method to incorporate outcomes and outcome measurement into school nursing documentation. Each NOC outcome has a definition with a list of possible indicators used to measure the outcome. When developing a plan of care, the NOC outcome is linked to a nursing diagnosis (NANDA) and the interventions (NIC, or nursing interventions classification) used to reach the outcome. The NOC system is recognized by the American Nurses Association (2006), and the most recent edition of NOC (Moorhead et al., 2008) includes 385 outcomes that incorporate seven different domain areas, including functional health, physical and psychological health, health knowledge, perceived health, family health, and community health. The NOC system uses 5-point Likert-type scales to measure progress toward an expected\",\"PeriodicalId\":412278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NASN Newsletter\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NASN Newsletter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1942602X08322154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NASN Newsletter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1942602X08322154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

凯蒂是一个16岁的女孩,她经常去学校护士办公室,经常是泪流满面。她呼吸急促,眼神交流很少,而且明显心烦意乱。作为学校护士,你认识凯蒂五年了,还记得她的广泛性焦虑症病史。知道了这些信息,你想帮助凯蒂实现什么结果?最有可能的结果是帮助凯蒂提高她的应对技巧和控制她的焦虑,但是你能对凯蒂做什么干预来帮助她实现这个结果呢?尽管许多学校护理似乎关注于干预(我们如何帮助像凯蒂这样的学生),但学校护士必须首先确定期望的结果,然后实施干预以实现该结果,最后在像凯蒂这样的情况下衡量结果,看看干预是否成功。结果被视为保健和教育有效性的衡量标准。对于学校护士来说,在教育环境中监测学生、家庭和社区的健康状况是一项挑战,因为教育环境的重点是教育成果。有趣的是,学校护士可以描述他们与学生,教师和家庭互动的无数积极成果。不幸的是,以一致的方式展示衡量学校护理成果的能力并不那么容易。最近几项研究确定了学校环境中干预措施与结果之间的联系。这些文章为讨论和进一步发展学校护士的结果测量提供了一个很好的起点(Maughan, 2003;Selekman & Guilday, 2003;Weismuller, Grasska, Alexander, White, & Kramer, 2007)。随着“不让一个孩子掉队”(U.S. Department of Education, 2002)的实施,教育成果得到了公众和教育系统的广泛认可。教育成果可以简单地定义为“学业成功”,最近通过“不让一个孩子掉队”的分类定义为精通或不精通(美国教育部,2002年)。标准化考试提供了结果测量,使教育系统能够跟踪学生的进步或需要进一步的帮助。对教育和发展水平相似的学生群体采用教学方法,即教育干预措施,使学生能够学习和应用课堂上教授的信息,然后将这些信息记录在标准化测试中。学校护理成果及其测量尚处于发展和使用的初始阶段,难以定义。学校护士的角色通常用任务导向的框架来描述(Selekman & Guilday, 2003)。因此,许多学校护士是根据执行任务的频率来评估的,而不是根据学生或人群对干预措施的反应。学校护理实践是基于护理过程,这是以前被称为五个步骤的过程,包括评估,诊断,计划,干预和评估。最后,为了评估护理计划和干预措施的有效性,护士需要在启动护理计划之前确定预期的结果。《学校护理:实践的范围和标准》(美国护士协会和NASN, 2005年)纳入了护理过程的第六步,因此护理过程现在被认为是评估、诊断、结果、计划、干预和评估。在开始任何干预措施之前,纳入预期结果以及如何衡量该结果对于衡量护理的有效性至关重要。凭直觉,学校护士可能会考虑他们试图实现的结果,但除非有一致的记录测量结果,否则很难确定达到结果的最有效干预措施。护理结果分类(NOC)系统(Moorhead, Johnson, Maas, & Swanson, 2008)是一种将结果和结果测量纳入学校护理文件的方法。每个NOC结果都有一个定义,其中列出了用于衡量结果的可能指标。在制定护理计划时,NOC结果与护理诊断(NANDA)和用于达到结果的干预措施(NIC,或护理干预分类)相关联。NOC系统得到了美国护士协会的认可(2006年),最新版本的NOC (Moorhead等人,2008年)包括385项结果,纳入了七个不同的领域,包括功能健康、身心健康、健康知识、感知健康、家庭健康和社区健康。NOC系统使用李克特式5分制来衡量实现预期目标的进度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Show Me the Outcomes in School Health
Katie is a 16-year-old female who presents to the School Nurse’s office frequently—often at the verge of tears. Her respiratory rate is rapid, she has poor eye contact, and she is visibly upset. As the School Nurse, you have known Katie for five years and recall her history of generalized anxiety. Knowing this information, what outcome do you want to help Katie achieve? Most likely your outcome is to help Katie improve her coping skills and manage her anxiety, but what interventions can you do with Katie that will help her achieve this outcome? Although much of school nursing appears to focus on interventions (what we do to help students like Katie), it is essential for School Nurses to identify the desired outcome first, then implement interventions to achieve that outcome, and finally measure that outcome in situations such as Katie’s to see if the intervention was successful. Outcomes are viewed as measures of effectiveness in health care and education. It is challenging for School Nurses to monitor health outcomes of students, families, and communities within the educational setting, where the focus is on educational outcomes. Anecdotally, School Nurses can describe countless positive outcomes from their interactions with students, faculty, and families. Unfortunately, the ability to demonstrate measurement of school nursing outcomes in a consistent manner is not so easy. Several research studies recently identified the link between interventions and outcomes in the school setting. These articles provide an excellent starting point for discussion and further development of outcome measurements by School Nurses (Maughan, 2003; Selekman & Guilday, 2003; Weismuller, Grasska, Alexander, White, & Kramer, 2007). With No Child Left Behind (U.S. Department of Education, 2002), outcomes in education have become well recognized by the public and the education system. Educational outcomes can be simply defined as “academic success” and have been most recently defined through No Child Left Behind classifications as proficient or nonproficient (U.S. Department of Education, 2002). Standardized tests provide the outcome measurements that allow the educational system to track a student’s progress or need for further assistance. The use of teaching methods, education’s interventions, for groups of students at similar educational and developmental levels enables students to learn and apply information taught in the classroom that is then documented by these standardized tests. School nursing outcomes and their measurement are in initial stages of development and use and are more difficult to define. The role of a School Nurse is often described with a taskoriented framework (Selekman & Guilday, 2003). Consequently, many School Nurses are evaluated on the basis of the frequency of the tasks performed instead of the student’s or population’s response to interventions. School nursing practice is based on the nursing process, which was previously known as a fivestep process that included assessment, diagnosis, planning, interventions, and evaluation. Ultimately, to evaluate the effectiveness of a plan of care and the interventions, a nurse needs to identify the anticipated outcomes prior to initiating the plan of care. School Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice (American Nurses Association & NASN, 2005) incorporates a sixth step in the nursing process, so the nursing process is now recognized as assessment, diagnosis, outcome, planning, interventions, and evaluation. The inclusion of an anticipated outcome and how this outcome will be measured before any interventions are initiated is essential to measure the effectiveness of nursing care. Intuitively, School Nurses may think about outcomes they are trying to achieve, but unless there is a consistent documented measurement of outcomes, it is difficult to determine the most effective interventions to reach an outcome. The Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) system (Moorhead, Johnson, Maas, & Swanson, 2008) is a method to incorporate outcomes and outcome measurement into school nursing documentation. Each NOC outcome has a definition with a list of possible indicators used to measure the outcome. When developing a plan of care, the NOC outcome is linked to a nursing diagnosis (NANDA) and the interventions (NIC, or nursing interventions classification) used to reach the outcome. The NOC system is recognized by the American Nurses Association (2006), and the most recent edition of NOC (Moorhead et al., 2008) includes 385 outcomes that incorporate seven different domain areas, including functional health, physical and psychological health, health knowledge, perceived health, family health, and community health. The NOC system uses 5-point Likert-type scales to measure progress toward an expected
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信