在巴厘岛实施公证机构以电子方式认证交易的障碍

Ida Bagus Dalem Try Utama Manuaba, I. W. Astara, Ida Bagus Agung Putra Santika
{"title":"在巴厘岛实施公证机构以电子方式认证交易的障碍","authors":"Ida Bagus Dalem Try Utama Manuaba, I. W. Astara, Ida Bagus Agung Putra Santika","doi":"10.22225/jn.7.2.2022.46-54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to examine the implementation and constraints of implementing the authority of a Notary to certify transactions electronically. The type of research used is empirical legal research. This study is analysed by using the theory of authority and the theory of utilitarianism (legal expediency) so as to obtain the conclusion of the discussion study in the form of implementation of electronically certifying transactions by a Notary in the form of legal actions or actions by a Notary in providing ratification of an electronic transaction that has similarities with legalization or waarmerking owned by a Notary conventionally. Based on analysis, it was obtained the results that the authority is attributive because it is obtained directly based on the provisions of Article 15 Paragraph (3) of the UUJN-P so that juridically the Notary has this authority only in its implementation because there is no one guideline due to the absence of further arrangements regarding procedures, procedures and types of notary legal actions that are qualified as certifying transactions electronically. The obstacles faced, namely the implementation of certifying transactions electronically in perspective as evidence, it can be conveyed that electronic documents as evidence of legal actions certifying transactions electronically by Notaries are not yet clear the strength of proof as evidence whether it is qualified as an authentic deed product or is it limited to registering, knowing the existence of documents that are certified as legal actions Notary as legalizing or megewaarmeken. \n ","PeriodicalId":190076,"journal":{"name":"NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OBSTACLES TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF NOTARY AUTHORITY TO CERTIFY TRANSACTIONS ELECTRONICALLY IN BALI\",\"authors\":\"Ida Bagus Dalem Try Utama Manuaba, I. W. Astara, Ida Bagus Agung Putra Santika\",\"doi\":\"10.22225/jn.7.2.2022.46-54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to examine the implementation and constraints of implementing the authority of a Notary to certify transactions electronically. The type of research used is empirical legal research. This study is analysed by using the theory of authority and the theory of utilitarianism (legal expediency) so as to obtain the conclusion of the discussion study in the form of implementation of electronically certifying transactions by a Notary in the form of legal actions or actions by a Notary in providing ratification of an electronic transaction that has similarities with legalization or waarmerking owned by a Notary conventionally. Based on analysis, it was obtained the results that the authority is attributive because it is obtained directly based on the provisions of Article 15 Paragraph (3) of the UUJN-P so that juridically the Notary has this authority only in its implementation because there is no one guideline due to the absence of further arrangements regarding procedures, procedures and types of notary legal actions that are qualified as certifying transactions electronically. The obstacles faced, namely the implementation of certifying transactions electronically in perspective as evidence, it can be conveyed that electronic documents as evidence of legal actions certifying transactions electronically by Notaries are not yet clear the strength of proof as evidence whether it is qualified as an authentic deed product or is it limited to registering, knowing the existence of documents that are certified as legal actions Notary as legalizing or megewaarmeken. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":190076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22225/jn.7.2.2022.46-54\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22225/jn.7.2.2022.46-54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是研究实现公证员的权力以电子方式认证交易的实施和限制。所使用的研究类型是实证法律研究。本研究运用权威理论和功利主义(法律权宜之计)理论进行分析,从而得出公证员以法律行为的形式实施电子认证交易或公证员在提供电子交易批准方面的行为的讨论研究结论,这与公证员传统上拥有的合法化或waarmerking有相似之处。通过分析,得出的结论是,该权限是根据ujn - p第15条第(3)款的规定直接获得的,因此在司法上,公证员仅在其实施中具有该权限,因为没有对具有电子交易认证资格的公证法律行为的程序、程序和类型进行进一步安排,因此没有一个指导方针。所面临的障碍,即实现交易电子认证作为证据的视角,可以传达的是,电子文件作为法律行为的证据,由公证人进行交易电子认证的证明作为证据的力度尚不明确,它是否有资格作为真实的契约产品,还是仅限于注册,知道公证作为法律行为认证的文件是否存在合法化或megewaarmeken。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
OBSTACLES TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF NOTARY AUTHORITY TO CERTIFY TRANSACTIONS ELECTRONICALLY IN BALI
This study aims to examine the implementation and constraints of implementing the authority of a Notary to certify transactions electronically. The type of research used is empirical legal research. This study is analysed by using the theory of authority and the theory of utilitarianism (legal expediency) so as to obtain the conclusion of the discussion study in the form of implementation of electronically certifying transactions by a Notary in the form of legal actions or actions by a Notary in providing ratification of an electronic transaction that has similarities with legalization or waarmerking owned by a Notary conventionally. Based on analysis, it was obtained the results that the authority is attributive because it is obtained directly based on the provisions of Article 15 Paragraph (3) of the UUJN-P so that juridically the Notary has this authority only in its implementation because there is no one guideline due to the absence of further arrangements regarding procedures, procedures and types of notary legal actions that are qualified as certifying transactions electronically. The obstacles faced, namely the implementation of certifying transactions electronically in perspective as evidence, it can be conveyed that electronic documents as evidence of legal actions certifying transactions electronically by Notaries are not yet clear the strength of proof as evidence whether it is qualified as an authentic deed product or is it limited to registering, knowing the existence of documents that are certified as legal actions Notary as legalizing or megewaarmeken.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信