“一带一路”对外传播研究——《中国日报》、《CNN》、《CNBC》对“一带一路”相关报道的比较分析

Liaoran Hu
{"title":"“一带一路”对外传播研究——《中国日报》、《CNN》、《CNBC》对“一带一路”相关报道的比较分析","authors":"Liaoran Hu","doi":"10.2991/mmetss-19.2019.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research on the status quo and problems of Chinese and foreign media reports proposed by \"One Belt And One Road\" is of necessity and importance to the improvement of China's international influence and the enhancement of China's external communication capacity. This article mainly uses content analysis method and takes China Daily in china and CNN and CNBC in United States as research objects, through the feature analysis and comparative study of the Belt and Road Initiative report, and finally found that the reporting agenda of China Daily, CNN and CNBC three media was similarly set up from three aspects: economic, social and ecological civilization construction, and all of them paid the greatest attention to the economic and trade initiatives of the initiative in the report. In addition, under the ideological conflict, there are obvious differences in attitudes in the economic issues of the “Belt and Road Initiative” in the Chinese and American media. In contrast, some of the social infrastructure and ecological civilization construction with low relevance to ideology in the initiative have gained consistent recognition attitude in different media in China and the United States. In terms of the reporting attitudes and inclinations, the study found that there are still some obvious differences in the perception of China’s “One Belt, One Road” initiative by the Western media and the public, which is largely due to the misunderstanding and distorted reports from western media’s “One Belt, One Road” initiative. Based on this, improving the comprehensiveness and accuracy of China's “Belt and Road Initiative” cross-border reporting is of great significance for enhancing the influence of the initiative and enhancing China's external communication capabilities. 1. Research background The “One Belt And One Road” initiative was firstly proposed by Chinese President Xi Jinping in 2013.With the signing of the \"One Belt, One Road\" memorandum between China and Italy in March 2019, \"One Belt, One Road\" has once again become a hot topic in China. The implementation of the initiative is based on the joint participation of countries along the \"One Belt And One Road\" route. However, at present, many other countries' one-sided understanding or even misunderstanding of this initiative proposed by China. For example, “China was imposing high levels of debt on nations in the Asia Pacific to acquire strategic assets or political influence over debtor nations” (from CNN). These misunderstand the purpose and original intention of \"One Belt, One Road\". Some western countries still view China's peaceful rise in the cold war mentality and power logic.This mentality is bound to be reflected directly or indirectly in mainstream media reports. Therefore, it is crucial to convey the concept and initiative of \"One Belt, One Road\" to international audience accurately, comprehensively and concretely. This study takes the Chinese and American mainstream media reports of \"One Belt, One Road\" as examples, using content analysis method, selecting a total of 30 reports from CNN, CNBC and China 1 Luo Yan. How to tell the story of China in the \"One Belt, One Road\" international communication[J].News World, 2018(04):70-73. 4th International Conference on Modern Management, Education Technology and Social Science (MMETSS 2019) Copyright © 2019, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 351","PeriodicalId":363311,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Modern Management, Education Technology and Social Science (MMETSS 2019)","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External Communication Research of the Belt and Road Initiative——Comparative analysis of the relevant reports on the Belt and Road Initiative in China daily, CNN and CNBC\",\"authors\":\"Liaoran Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/mmetss-19.2019.125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The research on the status quo and problems of Chinese and foreign media reports proposed by \\\"One Belt And One Road\\\" is of necessity and importance to the improvement of China's international influence and the enhancement of China's external communication capacity. This article mainly uses content analysis method and takes China Daily in china and CNN and CNBC in United States as research objects, through the feature analysis and comparative study of the Belt and Road Initiative report, and finally found that the reporting agenda of China Daily, CNN and CNBC three media was similarly set up from three aspects: economic, social and ecological civilization construction, and all of them paid the greatest attention to the economic and trade initiatives of the initiative in the report. In addition, under the ideological conflict, there are obvious differences in attitudes in the economic issues of the “Belt and Road Initiative” in the Chinese and American media. In contrast, some of the social infrastructure and ecological civilization construction with low relevance to ideology in the initiative have gained consistent recognition attitude in different media in China and the United States. In terms of the reporting attitudes and inclinations, the study found that there are still some obvious differences in the perception of China’s “One Belt, One Road” initiative by the Western media and the public, which is largely due to the misunderstanding and distorted reports from western media’s “One Belt, One Road” initiative. Based on this, improving the comprehensiveness and accuracy of China's “Belt and Road Initiative” cross-border reporting is of great significance for enhancing the influence of the initiative and enhancing China's external communication capabilities. 1. Research background The “One Belt And One Road” initiative was firstly proposed by Chinese President Xi Jinping in 2013.With the signing of the \\\"One Belt, One Road\\\" memorandum between China and Italy in March 2019, \\\"One Belt, One Road\\\" has once again become a hot topic in China. The implementation of the initiative is based on the joint participation of countries along the \\\"One Belt And One Road\\\" route. However, at present, many other countries' one-sided understanding or even misunderstanding of this initiative proposed by China. For example, “China was imposing high levels of debt on nations in the Asia Pacific to acquire strategic assets or political influence over debtor nations” (from CNN). These misunderstand the purpose and original intention of \\\"One Belt, One Road\\\". Some western countries still view China's peaceful rise in the cold war mentality and power logic.This mentality is bound to be reflected directly or indirectly in mainstream media reports. Therefore, it is crucial to convey the concept and initiative of \\\"One Belt, One Road\\\" to international audience accurately, comprehensively and concretely. This study takes the Chinese and American mainstream media reports of \\\"One Belt, One Road\\\" as examples, using content analysis method, selecting a total of 30 reports from CNN, CNBC and China 1 Luo Yan. How to tell the story of China in the \\\"One Belt, One Road\\\" international communication[J].News World, 2018(04):70-73. 4th International Conference on Modern Management, Education Technology and Social Science (MMETSS 2019) Copyright © 2019, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 351\",\"PeriodicalId\":363311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Modern Management, Education Technology and Social Science (MMETSS 2019)\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Modern Management, Education Technology and Social Science (MMETSS 2019)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/mmetss-19.2019.125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Modern Management, Education Technology and Social Science (MMETSS 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/mmetss-19.2019.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

“b一带一路”提出的中外媒体报道现状及问题研究,对于提升中国国际影响力,增强中国对外传播能力,是十分必要和重要的。本文主要采用内容分析法,以中国的《中国日报》和美国的CNN、CNBC为研究对象,通过对“一带一路”报道的特点分析和比较研究,最终发现《中国日报》、CNN、CNBC三家媒体的报道议程从三个方面进行了相似的设置:经济、社会和生态文明建设,都是报告中最关注的经贸倡议。此外,在意识形态冲突下,中美媒体对“一带一路”经济议题的态度也存在明显差异。相比之下,“一带一路”中一些与意识形态关联度较低的社会基础设施和生态文明建设在中美两国不同媒体中获得了一致的认可态度。在报道态度和倾向方面,研究发现,西方媒体和公众对中国“一带一路”倡议的认知仍存在一些明显差异,这在很大程度上是由于西方媒体对“一带一路”倡议的误解和歪曲报道所致。基于此,提高中国“一带一路”跨境报道的全面性和准确性,对于提升“一带一路”倡议影响力,提升中国对外传播能力具有重要意义。1. 随着2019年3月中国与意大利签署“一带一路”备忘录,“一带一路”再次成为中国的热门话题。“一带一路”倡议的实施基于“一带一路”沿线国家的共同参与。但目前,许多国家对中国提出的“一带一路”倡议存在片面理解甚至误解。例如,“中国对亚太国家施加高额债务,以获得对债务国的战略资产或政治影响力”(来自CNN)。这些误解了“一带一路”的宗旨和初衷。一些西方国家仍然用冷战思维和大国逻辑看待中国的和平崛起。这种心态必然会直接或间接地反映在主流媒体的报道中。因此,准确、全面、具体地向国际受众传达“一带一路”的理念和倡议至关重要。本研究以中美主流媒体对“一带一路”的报道为例,采用内容分析法,选取CNN、CNBC和中国1罗岩共30篇报道。如何在“一带一路”国际传播中讲述中国故事[J]。新闻世界,2018(04):70-73。第四届现代管理、教育技术与社会科学国际会议(MMETSS 2019)版权所有©2019,作者。亚特兰蒂斯出版社出版。这是一篇基于CC BY-NC许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)的开放获取文章。《社会科学、教育和人文研究进展》,第351卷
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
External Communication Research of the Belt and Road Initiative——Comparative analysis of the relevant reports on the Belt and Road Initiative in China daily, CNN and CNBC
The research on the status quo and problems of Chinese and foreign media reports proposed by "One Belt And One Road" is of necessity and importance to the improvement of China's international influence and the enhancement of China's external communication capacity. This article mainly uses content analysis method and takes China Daily in china and CNN and CNBC in United States as research objects, through the feature analysis and comparative study of the Belt and Road Initiative report, and finally found that the reporting agenda of China Daily, CNN and CNBC three media was similarly set up from three aspects: economic, social and ecological civilization construction, and all of them paid the greatest attention to the economic and trade initiatives of the initiative in the report. In addition, under the ideological conflict, there are obvious differences in attitudes in the economic issues of the “Belt and Road Initiative” in the Chinese and American media. In contrast, some of the social infrastructure and ecological civilization construction with low relevance to ideology in the initiative have gained consistent recognition attitude in different media in China and the United States. In terms of the reporting attitudes and inclinations, the study found that there are still some obvious differences in the perception of China’s “One Belt, One Road” initiative by the Western media and the public, which is largely due to the misunderstanding and distorted reports from western media’s “One Belt, One Road” initiative. Based on this, improving the comprehensiveness and accuracy of China's “Belt and Road Initiative” cross-border reporting is of great significance for enhancing the influence of the initiative and enhancing China's external communication capabilities. 1. Research background The “One Belt And One Road” initiative was firstly proposed by Chinese President Xi Jinping in 2013.With the signing of the "One Belt, One Road" memorandum between China and Italy in March 2019, "One Belt, One Road" has once again become a hot topic in China. The implementation of the initiative is based on the joint participation of countries along the "One Belt And One Road" route. However, at present, many other countries' one-sided understanding or even misunderstanding of this initiative proposed by China. For example, “China was imposing high levels of debt on nations in the Asia Pacific to acquire strategic assets or political influence over debtor nations” (from CNN). These misunderstand the purpose and original intention of "One Belt, One Road". Some western countries still view China's peaceful rise in the cold war mentality and power logic.This mentality is bound to be reflected directly or indirectly in mainstream media reports. Therefore, it is crucial to convey the concept and initiative of "One Belt, One Road" to international audience accurately, comprehensively and concretely. This study takes the Chinese and American mainstream media reports of "One Belt, One Road" as examples, using content analysis method, selecting a total of 30 reports from CNN, CNBC and China 1 Luo Yan. How to tell the story of China in the "One Belt, One Road" international communication[J].News World, 2018(04):70-73. 4th International Conference on Modern Management, Education Technology and Social Science (MMETSS 2019) Copyright © 2019, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 351
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信