116初次结肠镜检查后随访结肠镜检查的监测间隔:一项回顾性研究

Jun-Hung Lai, Tsai-Wei Huang
{"title":"116初次结肠镜检查后随访结肠镜检查的监测间隔:一项回顾性研究","authors":"Jun-Hung Lai, Tsai-Wei Huang","doi":"10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111070.116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background More and more people have undergone colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. The surveillance interval is up to the patients with low- or high-risk polyps at the first screening. According to the guideline of US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, they recommend that the surveillance intervals for patients with the low-risk polyps are 5 to 10 years, and for high-risk are 3 years. Aims We would like to investigate what is the time of follow-up interval in the patients (low- and high-risk) at present. Methods We retrospectively study individuals who had undergone surveillance colonoscopy during 2011 through 2017 in a community hospital. Each time colonoscopic findings were divided to two groups: (1) low-risk polyps (2) high-risk polyps. No polyps or small (<10 mm) hyperplastic polyps detected were inclusive to low-risk polyps. Results A total of 55 patients were collected. 40 patients (72.7%) were in low-risk polyps group and 15 (27.3%) were in high-risk polyps group according to their first colonoscopy result. In low-risk group, the average years of follow-up intervals are 3.68 years (SD 2.09), and 27 of 40 patients (67.5%) are less than 5 years (range 1–4 years). Positive fecal occult blood test (29.6%), bloody stool passage (22.2%) and colonic polyps’ history (25.5%) are the common reasons why these patients practiced next screening colonoscopy in advance. In high-risk group, the average years of follow-up intervals are 2.38 years (SD 1.45), and 10 of 15 patients (67.5%) are less than 3 years (range 1–2 years). Colonic polyps’ history (70%) is the most frequent reasons why the patients practiced next screening colonoscopy in advance. Another issue is for age older than 75 years old, 2 of 5 patients had high-risk polyps at first time colonoscopy, however, they all had low risk polyps at follow-up colonoscopy surveillance. Conclusions This study reveals the discrepancy between practitioner recommendations and current guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance in the time of follow-up colonoscopy. It might be caused by frequent fecal occult blood test (biennial), bowel cleansing preparation, and continuing education for practitioners. The Ministry of Health and Welfare must conduct a broader assessment of screening schedule.","PeriodicalId":298595,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Evidenced-Based Medicine","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"116 The surveillance interval of follow-up colonoscopy after an initial colonoscopy: a retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"Jun-Hung Lai, Tsai-Wei Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111070.116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background More and more people have undergone colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. The surveillance interval is up to the patients with low- or high-risk polyps at the first screening. According to the guideline of US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, they recommend that the surveillance intervals for patients with the low-risk polyps are 5 to 10 years, and for high-risk are 3 years. Aims We would like to investigate what is the time of follow-up interval in the patients (low- and high-risk) at present. Methods We retrospectively study individuals who had undergone surveillance colonoscopy during 2011 through 2017 in a community hospital. Each time colonoscopic findings were divided to two groups: (1) low-risk polyps (2) high-risk polyps. No polyps or small (<10 mm) hyperplastic polyps detected were inclusive to low-risk polyps. Results A total of 55 patients were collected. 40 patients (72.7%) were in low-risk polyps group and 15 (27.3%) were in high-risk polyps group according to their first colonoscopy result. In low-risk group, the average years of follow-up intervals are 3.68 years (SD 2.09), and 27 of 40 patients (67.5%) are less than 5 years (range 1–4 years). Positive fecal occult blood test (29.6%), bloody stool passage (22.2%) and colonic polyps’ history (25.5%) are the common reasons why these patients practiced next screening colonoscopy in advance. In high-risk group, the average years of follow-up intervals are 2.38 years (SD 1.45), and 10 of 15 patients (67.5%) are less than 3 years (range 1–2 years). Colonic polyps’ history (70%) is the most frequent reasons why the patients practiced next screening colonoscopy in advance. Another issue is for age older than 75 years old, 2 of 5 patients had high-risk polyps at first time colonoscopy, however, they all had low risk polyps at follow-up colonoscopy surveillance. Conclusions This study reveals the discrepancy between practitioner recommendations and current guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance in the time of follow-up colonoscopy. It might be caused by frequent fecal occult blood test (biennial), bowel cleansing preparation, and continuing education for practitioners. The Ministry of Health and Welfare must conduct a broader assessment of screening schedule.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Evidenced-Based Medicine\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Evidenced-Based Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111070.116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Evidenced-Based Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111070.116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的人接受结肠镜检查来筛查结直肠癌。在第一次筛查时,监测间隔取决于低风险或高风险息肉患者。根据美国多协会结直肠癌工作组的指南,他们建议低风险息肉患者的监测间隔为5 - 10年,高风险息肉患者的监测间隔为3年。目的探讨目前患者(低、高危)的随访间隔时间。方法回顾性研究2011年至2017年在社区医院接受结肠镜检查的个体。每次结肠镜检查结果分为两组:(1)低危性息肉(2)高危性息肉。未检出息肉或小(<10 mm)增生性息肉为低危性息肉。结果共收集患者55例。根据首次结肠镜检查结果,低危息肉组40例(72.7%),高危息肉组15例(27.3%)。低危组平均随访时间间隔为3.68年(SD 2.09), 40例患者中有27例(67.5%)小于5年(范围1 ~ 4年)。粪便隐血试验阳性(29.6%)、带血便道(22.2%)和结肠息肉史(25.5%)是这些患者提前进行下一次筛查结肠镜检查的常见原因。高危组平均随访时间为2.38年(SD 1.45), 15例患者中有10例(67.5%)随访时间小于3年(范围1-2年)。结肠息肉病史(70%)是患者提前进行下一次筛查结肠镜检查的最常见原因。另一个问题是对于75岁以上的患者,5例患者中有2例首次结肠镜检查为高危息肉,而随访结肠镜检查均为低危息肉。结论本研究揭示了医生建议和现行指南在结肠镜随访时结肠镜监测的差异。它可能是由频繁的粪便隐血检查(两年一次)、肠道清洁准备和对从业人员的继续教育引起的。保健福利部必须对检查日程进行更广泛的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
116 The surveillance interval of follow-up colonoscopy after an initial colonoscopy: a retrospective study
Background More and more people have undergone colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. The surveillance interval is up to the patients with low- or high-risk polyps at the first screening. According to the guideline of US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, they recommend that the surveillance intervals for patients with the low-risk polyps are 5 to 10 years, and for high-risk are 3 years. Aims We would like to investigate what is the time of follow-up interval in the patients (low- and high-risk) at present. Methods We retrospectively study individuals who had undergone surveillance colonoscopy during 2011 through 2017 in a community hospital. Each time colonoscopic findings were divided to two groups: (1) low-risk polyps (2) high-risk polyps. No polyps or small (<10 mm) hyperplastic polyps detected were inclusive to low-risk polyps. Results A total of 55 patients were collected. 40 patients (72.7%) were in low-risk polyps group and 15 (27.3%) were in high-risk polyps group according to their first colonoscopy result. In low-risk group, the average years of follow-up intervals are 3.68 years (SD 2.09), and 27 of 40 patients (67.5%) are less than 5 years (range 1–4 years). Positive fecal occult blood test (29.6%), bloody stool passage (22.2%) and colonic polyps’ history (25.5%) are the common reasons why these patients practiced next screening colonoscopy in advance. In high-risk group, the average years of follow-up intervals are 2.38 years (SD 1.45), and 10 of 15 patients (67.5%) are less than 3 years (range 1–2 years). Colonic polyps’ history (70%) is the most frequent reasons why the patients practiced next screening colonoscopy in advance. Another issue is for age older than 75 years old, 2 of 5 patients had high-risk polyps at first time colonoscopy, however, they all had low risk polyps at follow-up colonoscopy surveillance. Conclusions This study reveals the discrepancy between practitioner recommendations and current guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance in the time of follow-up colonoscopy. It might be caused by frequent fecal occult blood test (biennial), bowel cleansing preparation, and continuing education for practitioners. The Ministry of Health and Welfare must conduct a broader assessment of screening schedule.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信