基于模糊逻辑方法的光伏系统动态性能优化

N. Aouchiche, M. S. A. Cheikh, M. Becherif, M. Ebrahim, A. Hadjarab
{"title":"基于模糊逻辑方法的光伏系统动态性能优化","authors":"N. Aouchiche, M. S. A. Cheikh, M. Becherif, M. Ebrahim, A. Hadjarab","doi":"10.1109/ICEE-B.2017.8191986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Renewable Energies (RE) are considered as an important alternative sources of energy for the generation of electricity such as hydrogen and photovoltaic energies. To ensure an efficient photovoltaic energy conversion several Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) algorithms have been developed to incite the PV field to deliver maximum power. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative study of two classical MPPT algorithms against the Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based one under hypothetical and realistic atmospheric conditions. The suggested algorithms are Perturb and Observe (P&O) algorithm, Incremental of Conductance (IC) algorithm and Fuzzy Logic based Incremental Conductance (FL-IC). After the PV verification under hypothetical conditions such as slow and fast irradiance variations, the effectiveness of those numerous methods are evaluated in terms of stability, robustness and rapidity considering one-year realistic atmospheric irradiance data for Bouzareah region. Through MatlabTM-simulation results, the superiority of the FL-IC over other both classical algorithms is highlighted.","PeriodicalId":204170,"journal":{"name":"2017 5th International Conference on Electrical Engineering - Boumerdes (ICEE-B)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fuzzy logic approach based mppt for the dynamic performance improvement for PV systems\",\"authors\":\"N. Aouchiche, M. S. A. Cheikh, M. Becherif, M. Ebrahim, A. Hadjarab\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICEE-B.2017.8191986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Renewable Energies (RE) are considered as an important alternative sources of energy for the generation of electricity such as hydrogen and photovoltaic energies. To ensure an efficient photovoltaic energy conversion several Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) algorithms have been developed to incite the PV field to deliver maximum power. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative study of two classical MPPT algorithms against the Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based one under hypothetical and realistic atmospheric conditions. The suggested algorithms are Perturb and Observe (P&O) algorithm, Incremental of Conductance (IC) algorithm and Fuzzy Logic based Incremental Conductance (FL-IC). After the PV verification under hypothetical conditions such as slow and fast irradiance variations, the effectiveness of those numerous methods are evaluated in terms of stability, robustness and rapidity considering one-year realistic atmospheric irradiance data for Bouzareah region. Through MatlabTM-simulation results, the superiority of the FL-IC over other both classical algorithms is highlighted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":204170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 5th International Conference on Electrical Engineering - Boumerdes (ICEE-B)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 5th International Conference on Electrical Engineering - Boumerdes (ICEE-B)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEE-B.2017.8191986\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 5th International Conference on Electrical Engineering - Boumerdes (ICEE-B)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEE-B.2017.8191986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

可再生能源(RE)被认为是发电的重要替代能源,如氢和光伏能源。为了保证高效的光伏能量转换,开发了几种最大功率点跟踪(MPPT)算法来激励光伏场输出最大功率。本文在假设和现实大气条件下,对两种经典MPPT算法与基于人工智能(AI)的MPPT算法进行了全面的比较研究。提出的算法有摄动和观察(P&O)算法、电导增量(IC)算法和基于模糊逻辑的电导增量(FL-IC)算法。在假设条件下(如辐照度变化缓慢和快速)进行PV验证后,考虑Bouzareah地区一年的实际大气辐照度数据,从稳定性、鲁棒性和快速性方面评估了多种方法的有效性。通过matlabtm仿真结果,突出了FL-IC相对于其他两种经典算法的优越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fuzzy logic approach based mppt for the dynamic performance improvement for PV systems
Renewable Energies (RE) are considered as an important alternative sources of energy for the generation of electricity such as hydrogen and photovoltaic energies. To ensure an efficient photovoltaic energy conversion several Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) algorithms have been developed to incite the PV field to deliver maximum power. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative study of two classical MPPT algorithms against the Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based one under hypothetical and realistic atmospheric conditions. The suggested algorithms are Perturb and Observe (P&O) algorithm, Incremental of Conductance (IC) algorithm and Fuzzy Logic based Incremental Conductance (FL-IC). After the PV verification under hypothetical conditions such as slow and fast irradiance variations, the effectiveness of those numerous methods are evaluated in terms of stability, robustness and rapidity considering one-year realistic atmospheric irradiance data for Bouzareah region. Through MatlabTM-simulation results, the superiority of the FL-IC over other both classical algorithms is highlighted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信