手术磨砂膏减少手部细菌菌群的效果

D. Dissanayake, N. Fernando, G. Dabare, D. Weerasekera, R. Mahendra
{"title":"手术磨砂膏减少手部细菌菌群的效果","authors":"D. Dissanayake, N. Fernando, G. Dabare, D. Weerasekera, R. Mahendra","doi":"10.4038/CJMS.V47I1.4845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective The objective of our study was to compare the efficacy of five different surgical scrubbing agents (plain soap, antiseptic soap, 4% chlorhexidine, 7.5% povidone iodine and a commercial preparation of alcohol hand rub) in reducing the hand bacterial flora in two operation theatres in the Colombo South Teaching Hospital before and immediately after scrubbing. Design A comparative study. Setting Two operation theatres of the Colombo South Teaching Hospital. Participants Ten members of theatre staff who regularly operate or assist. Methods Hand scrubbing with the respective agent/rubbing with alcohol by all participants on different days. On each occasion imprints of fingertips and palm of the dominant hand was taken immediately before and after hand hygiene procedure. The bacterial colony .counts were taken after overnight incubation. The mean percentage reduction of colony counts was taken as the efficacy indicator. Statistical analysis was done by paired t test. Results Highest reduction of colony counts was by alcohol hand rub and it was significandy better than plain soap, antiseptic soap and povidone iodine (P 0.05). Conclusions Hand rubbing with alcohol and scrubbing with 4% chlorhexidine effectively reduced hand bacterial flora and they are superior to hand washing with plain soap and antiseptic soap. There is no added advantage in substituting antiseptic soap for plain soap in order to reduce bacterial burden in hands.","PeriodicalId":253405,"journal":{"name":"Ceylon Journal of Medical Science","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of surgical scrubs in reducing hand bacterial flora\",\"authors\":\"D. Dissanayake, N. Fernando, G. Dabare, D. Weerasekera, R. Mahendra\",\"doi\":\"10.4038/CJMS.V47I1.4845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective The objective of our study was to compare the efficacy of five different surgical scrubbing agents (plain soap, antiseptic soap, 4% chlorhexidine, 7.5% povidone iodine and a commercial preparation of alcohol hand rub) in reducing the hand bacterial flora in two operation theatres in the Colombo South Teaching Hospital before and immediately after scrubbing. Design A comparative study. Setting Two operation theatres of the Colombo South Teaching Hospital. Participants Ten members of theatre staff who regularly operate or assist. Methods Hand scrubbing with the respective agent/rubbing with alcohol by all participants on different days. On each occasion imprints of fingertips and palm of the dominant hand was taken immediately before and after hand hygiene procedure. The bacterial colony .counts were taken after overnight incubation. The mean percentage reduction of colony counts was taken as the efficacy indicator. Statistical analysis was done by paired t test. Results Highest reduction of colony counts was by alcohol hand rub and it was significandy better than plain soap, antiseptic soap and povidone iodine (P 0.05). Conclusions Hand rubbing with alcohol and scrubbing with 4% chlorhexidine effectively reduced hand bacterial flora and they are superior to hand washing with plain soap and antiseptic soap. There is no added advantage in substituting antiseptic soap for plain soap in order to reduce bacterial burden in hands.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ceylon Journal of Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ceylon Journal of Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4038/CJMS.V47I1.4845\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceylon Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/CJMS.V47I1.4845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的比较科伦坡南部教学医院2个手术室5种不同的手术洗洁剂(普通皂、消毒皂、4%氯己定、7.5%聚维酮碘和一种市售酒精洗手液)在洗洁前后手部菌群的减少效果。设计一个比较研究。科伦坡南教学医院的两个手术室。参加者指经常操作或协助的剧院工作人员。方法所有受试者在不同日期用各自的药剂搓手/用酒精搓手。每次都在手部卫生程序前后立即采集优势手的指尖和手掌的印记。孵育过夜后取菌落计数。以菌落计数减少的平均百分比作为药效指标。统计学分析采用配对t检验。结果酒精洗手液对菌落计数的减少效果最好,且显著优于普通皂、消毒皂和聚维酮碘(p0.05)。结论用酒精搓手和4%氯己定擦洗可有效减少手部细菌菌群,且优于普通皂和消毒皂。为了减少手上的细菌负担,用消毒肥皂代替普通肥皂并没有额外的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The efficacy of surgical scrubs in reducing hand bacterial flora
Objective The objective of our study was to compare the efficacy of five different surgical scrubbing agents (plain soap, antiseptic soap, 4% chlorhexidine, 7.5% povidone iodine and a commercial preparation of alcohol hand rub) in reducing the hand bacterial flora in two operation theatres in the Colombo South Teaching Hospital before and immediately after scrubbing. Design A comparative study. Setting Two operation theatres of the Colombo South Teaching Hospital. Participants Ten members of theatre staff who regularly operate or assist. Methods Hand scrubbing with the respective agent/rubbing with alcohol by all participants on different days. On each occasion imprints of fingertips and palm of the dominant hand was taken immediately before and after hand hygiene procedure. The bacterial colony .counts were taken after overnight incubation. The mean percentage reduction of colony counts was taken as the efficacy indicator. Statistical analysis was done by paired t test. Results Highest reduction of colony counts was by alcohol hand rub and it was significandy better than plain soap, antiseptic soap and povidone iodine (P 0.05). Conclusions Hand rubbing with alcohol and scrubbing with 4% chlorhexidine effectively reduced hand bacterial flora and they are superior to hand washing with plain soap and antiseptic soap. There is no added advantage in substituting antiseptic soap for plain soap in order to reduce bacterial burden in hands.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信