电力使用中的节能算法-节能算法与机器学习技术的比较

Siu Ki Paul Kwok
{"title":"电力使用中的节能算法-节能算法与机器学习技术的比较","authors":"Siu Ki Paul Kwok","doi":"10.1109/CITRES.2010.5619803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we propose a collaborative comparison between the online/offline algorithms for energy demand power saving purposes. Based on the Gaia Power model, resource-buffering algorithms are considered a practical peak-shaving model to effectively minimize the excessive power request. Although the algorithmic infrastructure is focused on a battery, this energy demand power saving problem is analogous to traditional demand and supply problem. In light of the similarity, we implement various machine-learning techniques, including Multiple-Layer Perceptron(MLP), Radial Basis Functions(RBF), Recurrent Neural Networks(RNN) to the identical peak-shaving model problem. In addition, the traditional naïve forecasting model and linear regression will also be discussed. Our findings suggest that the neural networks not only show faster demand smoothing in power saving algorithms, but being a nature of online algorithms is also theoretically and statistically more efficient than resource buffering algorithm and DCEC technology.","PeriodicalId":354280,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE Conference on Innovative Technologies for an Efficient and Reliable Electricity Supply","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Power-saving algorithms in electricity usage - comparison between the power saving algorithms and machine learning techniques\",\"authors\":\"Siu Ki Paul Kwok\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CITRES.2010.5619803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we propose a collaborative comparison between the online/offline algorithms for energy demand power saving purposes. Based on the Gaia Power model, resource-buffering algorithms are considered a practical peak-shaving model to effectively minimize the excessive power request. Although the algorithmic infrastructure is focused on a battery, this energy demand power saving problem is analogous to traditional demand and supply problem. In light of the similarity, we implement various machine-learning techniques, including Multiple-Layer Perceptron(MLP), Radial Basis Functions(RBF), Recurrent Neural Networks(RNN) to the identical peak-shaving model problem. In addition, the traditional naïve forecasting model and linear regression will also be discussed. Our findings suggest that the neural networks not only show faster demand smoothing in power saving algorithms, but being a nature of online algorithms is also theoretically and statistically more efficient than resource buffering algorithm and DCEC technology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 IEEE Conference on Innovative Technologies for an Efficient and Reliable Electricity Supply\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 IEEE Conference on Innovative Technologies for an Efficient and Reliable Electricity Supply\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CITRES.2010.5619803\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE Conference on Innovative Technologies for an Efficient and Reliable Electricity Supply","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CITRES.2010.5619803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在本文中,我们提出了一种以能源需求节能为目的的在线/离线算法的协同比较。基于Gaia功率模型,资源缓冲算法被认为是一种实用的削峰模型,可以有效地减少多余的功率请求。虽然算法基础设施的重点是电池,但这种能源需求节能问题类似于传统的需求和供应问题。鉴于相似性,我们实现了各种机器学习技术,包括多层感知器(MLP)、径向基函数(RBF)、循环神经网络(RNN)来解决相同的削峰模型问题。此外,还将讨论传统的naïve预测模型和线性回归。我们的研究结果表明,神经网络不仅在节能算法中表现出更快的需求平滑,而且作为在线算法的本质,在理论上和统计上也比资源缓冲算法和DCEC技术更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Power-saving algorithms in electricity usage - comparison between the power saving algorithms and machine learning techniques
In this paper, we propose a collaborative comparison between the online/offline algorithms for energy demand power saving purposes. Based on the Gaia Power model, resource-buffering algorithms are considered a practical peak-shaving model to effectively minimize the excessive power request. Although the algorithmic infrastructure is focused on a battery, this energy demand power saving problem is analogous to traditional demand and supply problem. In light of the similarity, we implement various machine-learning techniques, including Multiple-Layer Perceptron(MLP), Radial Basis Functions(RBF), Recurrent Neural Networks(RNN) to the identical peak-shaving model problem. In addition, the traditional naïve forecasting model and linear regression will also be discussed. Our findings suggest that the neural networks not only show faster demand smoothing in power saving algorithms, but being a nature of online algorithms is also theoretically and statistically more efficient than resource buffering algorithm and DCEC technology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信