Berkay Yalçinkaya, Çağatay Cengiz
{"title":"YENİ BİR OİKOS OLARAK MODERN SİVİL TOPLUM","authors":"Berkay Yalçinkaya, Çağatay Cengiz","doi":"10.17550/AKADEMIKINCELEMELER.778576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even though the explanation of civil society on the basis of normative ground has been a general disposition, this base generally conceals the phenomenon of civil society instead of explaining its content. The acknowledgement with an apriori claim that civil society is a sphere of freedom, however, confines the concept to the theoretical area by detaching it from social reality. Bearing this in mind, the study aims to offer an insight to the concept of civil society by referring to oikos-polis dichotomy, which constitutes the basis of political thought in Ancient Greece by approaching with suspicion to all normative claims on civil society. Oikos-polis dichotomy, which is roughly based on obligation-emancipation distinction, provides a possibility to investigate comparatively the difference between Ancient period and the modern understanding. With respect to the phenomena of separation of economy and politics, ascendancy of work to the centre of social life, and sovereignty of instrumentalised reason, which are all embedded into capitalism, the study claims that civil society in modern era creates a “new oikos”. Therefore, the understanding of civil society whose boundary has been drawn as a sphere of non-political liberty is clarified by referring to its link with oikos.","PeriodicalId":401248,"journal":{"name":"Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi (AID)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi (AID)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17550/AKADEMIKINCELEMELER.778576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管以规范为基础的市民社会解释一直是一种普遍倾向,但这一基础往往掩盖了市民社会现象,而不是解释其内容。然而,以先验的主张承认公民社会是一个自由领域,将这一概念与社会现实分离开来,将其局限于理论领域。考虑到这一点,本研究的目的是通过参考构成古希腊政治思想基础的ikoos -polis二分法,通过怀疑地接近所有关于公民社会的规范性主张,提供对公民社会概念的洞察。Oikos-polis二分法大致建立在义务-解放的区分基础上,为比较考察古代与现代的理解差异提供了可能。对于资本主义所固有的经济与政治分离、工作主导社会生活、工具化理性主宰等现象,本研究认为现代市民社会创造了一种“新oikos”。因此,对公民社会的理解,其边界已被划定为一个非政治自由领域,是通过参考它与oikos的联系来澄清的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
YENİ BİR OİKOS OLARAK MODERN SİVİL TOPLUM
Even though the explanation of civil society on the basis of normative ground has been a general disposition, this base generally conceals the phenomenon of civil society instead of explaining its content. The acknowledgement with an apriori claim that civil society is a sphere of freedom, however, confines the concept to the theoretical area by detaching it from social reality. Bearing this in mind, the study aims to offer an insight to the concept of civil society by referring to oikos-polis dichotomy, which constitutes the basis of political thought in Ancient Greece by approaching with suspicion to all normative claims on civil society. Oikos-polis dichotomy, which is roughly based on obligation-emancipation distinction, provides a possibility to investigate comparatively the difference between Ancient period and the modern understanding. With respect to the phenomena of separation of economy and politics, ascendancy of work to the centre of social life, and sovereignty of instrumentalised reason, which are all embedded into capitalism, the study claims that civil society in modern era creates a “new oikos”. Therefore, the understanding of civil society whose boundary has been drawn as a sphere of non-political liberty is clarified by referring to its link with oikos.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信