加勒比发展的“人、钱和建议”

Sabine Clarke
{"title":"加勒比发展的“人、钱和建议”","authors":"Sabine Clarke","doi":"10.7765/9781526131409.00011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a break with previous policy, the Colonial Office announced in 1943 that it would promote industrial development in Britain’s colonies. Manufacturing ventures were now deemed essential to raise living standards and address the politically dangerous issue of colonial unemployment. Officials became occupied with the question of what constituted acceptable modes of intervention by metropolitan and colonial governments to facilitate economic diversification. The challenge was to reconcile the need for demonstration of a more constructive approach to development with some longstanding laissezfaire principles. Two wider political issues made Colonial Office attempts to persuade the Caribbean colonies to follow its preferred routes to industrialisation difficult, however. The increasing political autonomy of governments in the Caribbean region meant that Britain could not merely instruct its West Indian possessions to follow its edicts. In addition, it became clear that in the postwar world, the US hoped to shape development across the Caribbean along lines that it found conducive to its own interests. In the face of these challenges, the collation and dissemination of economic advice assumed an important role in the maintenance of Britain’s control over its British West Indian colonies after 1940. After 1944 Britain was involved in direct negotiations with the US about regionwide policies for the West Indies as a member of the Caribbean Commission. Despite the ostensible collaboration represented by this body, discussions between officials reveal substantial and entrenched differences in British and American visions for the industrial development of the Caribbean. These differences proved difficult to reconcile, informed as they were by the wider economic and political priorities of Britain and America in the postwar world. From the perspective of the British government, the actions of the Caribbean","PeriodicalId":371632,"journal":{"name":"Science at the end of empire","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Men, money and advice’ for Caribbean development\",\"authors\":\"Sabine Clarke\",\"doi\":\"10.7765/9781526131409.00011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a break with previous policy, the Colonial Office announced in 1943 that it would promote industrial development in Britain’s colonies. Manufacturing ventures were now deemed essential to raise living standards and address the politically dangerous issue of colonial unemployment. Officials became occupied with the question of what constituted acceptable modes of intervention by metropolitan and colonial governments to facilitate economic diversification. The challenge was to reconcile the need for demonstration of a more constructive approach to development with some longstanding laissezfaire principles. Two wider political issues made Colonial Office attempts to persuade the Caribbean colonies to follow its preferred routes to industrialisation difficult, however. The increasing political autonomy of governments in the Caribbean region meant that Britain could not merely instruct its West Indian possessions to follow its edicts. In addition, it became clear that in the postwar world, the US hoped to shape development across the Caribbean along lines that it found conducive to its own interests. In the face of these challenges, the collation and dissemination of economic advice assumed an important role in the maintenance of Britain’s control over its British West Indian colonies after 1940. After 1944 Britain was involved in direct negotiations with the US about regionwide policies for the West Indies as a member of the Caribbean Commission. Despite the ostensible collaboration represented by this body, discussions between officials reveal substantial and entrenched differences in British and American visions for the industrial development of the Caribbean. These differences proved difficult to reconcile, informed as they were by the wider economic and political priorities of Britain and America in the postwar world. From the perspective of the British government, the actions of the Caribbean\",\"PeriodicalId\":371632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science at the end of empire\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science at the end of empire\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526131409.00011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science at the end of empire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526131409.00011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与以往的政策不同,英国殖民地办公室在1943年宣布,它将促进英国殖民地的工业发展。制造业企业现在被认为是提高生活水平和解决殖民地失业这一政治上危险问题的必要条件。官员们开始忙于解决这样一个问题:什么是大都会和殖民地政府可以接受的干预模式,以促进经济多样化。面临的挑战是,如何在需要展示一种更有建设性的发展办法与某些长期存在的自由放任原则之间取得协调。然而,两个更广泛的政治问题使得殖民办公室试图说服加勒比殖民地遵循其首选的工业化路线变得困难。加勒比地区政府日益增长的政治自治权意味着英国不能仅仅指示其西印度属地遵守其法令。此外,很明显,在战后世界,美国希望按照它认为有利于自身利益的路线来塑造整个加勒比地区的发展。面对这些挑战,经济建议的整理和传播在1940年后英国对英属西印度殖民地的控制中发挥了重要作用。1944年后,英国作为加勒比委员会的成员,与美国就西印度群岛的地区政策进行了直接谈判。尽管这个机构代表着表面上的合作,但官员之间的讨论表明,英国和美国对加勒比工业发展的看法存在重大和根深蒂固的分歧。事实证明,这些差异很难调和,因为它们是由战后英美两国更广泛的经济和政治优先事项决定的。从英国政府的角度来看,加勒比地区的行动
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Men, money and advice’ for Caribbean development
In a break with previous policy, the Colonial Office announced in 1943 that it would promote industrial development in Britain’s colonies. Manufacturing ventures were now deemed essential to raise living standards and address the politically dangerous issue of colonial unemployment. Officials became occupied with the question of what constituted acceptable modes of intervention by metropolitan and colonial governments to facilitate economic diversification. The challenge was to reconcile the need for demonstration of a more constructive approach to development with some longstanding laissezfaire principles. Two wider political issues made Colonial Office attempts to persuade the Caribbean colonies to follow its preferred routes to industrialisation difficult, however. The increasing political autonomy of governments in the Caribbean region meant that Britain could not merely instruct its West Indian possessions to follow its edicts. In addition, it became clear that in the postwar world, the US hoped to shape development across the Caribbean along lines that it found conducive to its own interests. In the face of these challenges, the collation and dissemination of economic advice assumed an important role in the maintenance of Britain’s control over its British West Indian colonies after 1940. After 1944 Britain was involved in direct negotiations with the US about regionwide policies for the West Indies as a member of the Caribbean Commission. Despite the ostensible collaboration represented by this body, discussions between officials reveal substantial and entrenched differences in British and American visions for the industrial development of the Caribbean. These differences proved difficult to reconcile, informed as they were by the wider economic and political priorities of Britain and America in the postwar world. From the perspective of the British government, the actions of the Caribbean
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信