大型科技公司进入保险市场和法律挑战:专注于销售行为监管

S. Lim
{"title":"大型科技公司进入保险市场和法律挑战:专注于销售行为监管","authors":"S. Lim","doi":"10.36248/kdps.2023.17.1.079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Insurance companies, insurance agents, and insurance planners strongly resist the announcement of the Korean Financial Services Commission(FSC)'s policy to allow Big Tech's insurance comparison and recommendation service. Big Tech's entry into the insurance market, which has a large customer base and customer information, may threaten existing insurance companies. However, the financial authorities allow entry in stages, as is currently the case. Suppose we design and apply an appropriate regulatory system for permitted business activities. If this is done, the existing insurance industry and Big Tech can coexist while growing the pie in the insurance market, contrary to the insurance industry's concerns. Ultimately, it is expected that the competitiveness and financial inclusiveness of the insurance market will be strengthened due to Big Tech's entry into the insurance market. \nThe FSC stated that insurance brokerage is possible for platform operators but limited the available services to comparing and recommending insurance products that fall under the recommendation, which is step 1 of the five steps of brokerage, and linking operators. Accordingly, if the three big tech companies start the above service, it is unclear whether this corresponds to insurance brokerage and whether insurance brokerage regulations can be applied. Insurance brokerage has different characteristics from other brokerages. Even if the concept of insurance brokerage is analyzed to determine the insurance brokerage of Big Tech's insurance product comparison·recommendation services and provider connection services, it takes work to identify brokerage due to the problems inherent in the 5-step brokerage theory of the FSC. Among the two interpretation theories presented in this paper, even if it is based on the negation theory of brokerage, considering the reality of the service provided by Big Tech and the need for responsibility, the concept of insurance brokerage is widely interpreted for Big Tech, leaving room for acknowledgment of brokerage. If the requirements for appearance liability are met, Big Tech should bear brokerage liability. In the case of future regulation through revision of the law, it is a desirable direction in the legal system to include Big Tech in the insurance intermediary regulations under the Commercial Act and Insurance Business Act rather than preparing regulations in the Electronic Financial Transactions Act. Also, we need to add insurance brokerage clauses in the insurance section of the Korean Commercial Act.","PeriodicalId":129340,"journal":{"name":"Korean Insurance Law Association","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Big Tech's Entry into the Insurance Market and Legal Challenges: focused on sales conduct regulation\",\"authors\":\"S. Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.36248/kdps.2023.17.1.079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Insurance companies, insurance agents, and insurance planners strongly resist the announcement of the Korean Financial Services Commission(FSC)'s policy to allow Big Tech's insurance comparison and recommendation service. Big Tech's entry into the insurance market, which has a large customer base and customer information, may threaten existing insurance companies. However, the financial authorities allow entry in stages, as is currently the case. Suppose we design and apply an appropriate regulatory system for permitted business activities. If this is done, the existing insurance industry and Big Tech can coexist while growing the pie in the insurance market, contrary to the insurance industry's concerns. Ultimately, it is expected that the competitiveness and financial inclusiveness of the insurance market will be strengthened due to Big Tech's entry into the insurance market. \\nThe FSC stated that insurance brokerage is possible for platform operators but limited the available services to comparing and recommending insurance products that fall under the recommendation, which is step 1 of the five steps of brokerage, and linking operators. Accordingly, if the three big tech companies start the above service, it is unclear whether this corresponds to insurance brokerage and whether insurance brokerage regulations can be applied. Insurance brokerage has different characteristics from other brokerages. Even if the concept of insurance brokerage is analyzed to determine the insurance brokerage of Big Tech's insurance product comparison·recommendation services and provider connection services, it takes work to identify brokerage due to the problems inherent in the 5-step brokerage theory of the FSC. Among the two interpretation theories presented in this paper, even if it is based on the negation theory of brokerage, considering the reality of the service provided by Big Tech and the need for responsibility, the concept of insurance brokerage is widely interpreted for Big Tech, leaving room for acknowledgment of brokerage. If the requirements for appearance liability are met, Big Tech should bear brokerage liability. In the case of future regulation through revision of the law, it is a desirable direction in the legal system to include Big Tech in the insurance intermediary regulations under the Commercial Act and Insurance Business Act rather than preparing regulations in the Electronic Financial Transactions Act. Also, we need to add insurance brokerage clauses in the insurance section of the Korean Commercial Act.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Insurance Law Association\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Insurance Law Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36248/kdps.2023.17.1.079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Insurance Law Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36248/kdps.2023.17.1.079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

保险公司、保险代理公司、保险策划公司对金融委员会发表的允许大技术公司(Big Tech)提供保险比较及推荐服务的政策表示强烈反对。大型科技公司进入拥有庞大客户群和客户信息的保险市场,可能会威胁到现有的保险公司。但是,金融当局允许分阶段进入,就像目前的情况一样。假设我们为允许的业务活动设计并应用一个适当的监管系统。如果这样做,现有的保险业和大型科技公司可以共存,同时扩大保险市场的蛋糕,这与保险业的担忧相反。最终,预计由于大科技进入保险市场,保险市场的竞争力和金融包容性将得到加强。金融监督委员会表示,平台经营者可以进行保险经纪,但目前的服务仅限于比较推荐的保险产品(经纪5个步骤中的第1步)和连接经营者。因此,如果三大科技公司启动上述服务,这是否与保险经纪相对应,是否适用保险经纪法规,目前尚不清楚。保险经纪业务具有不同于其他经纪业务的特点。即使分析保险经纪的概念,以确定大科技保险产品比较·推荐服务和提供商连接服务的保险经纪,由于FSC的五步经纪理论固有的问题,确定经纪也需要做一些工作。在本文提出的两种解释理论中,即使是基于经纪否定理论,但考虑到科技巨头提供服务的现实和责任的需要,保险经纪的概念被广泛地解释为科技巨头,为经纪的承认留下了空间。符合表象责任要求的,应当承担经纪责任。在今后通过修改法律进行规制的情况下,将大技术公司纳入《商法》和《保险事业法》的保险中介规制中,而不是在《电子金融交易法》中制定规制,是法律体系的理想方向。另外,有必要在《商法》的保险条款中增加保险经纪条款。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Big Tech's Entry into the Insurance Market and Legal Challenges: focused on sales conduct regulation
Insurance companies, insurance agents, and insurance planners strongly resist the announcement of the Korean Financial Services Commission(FSC)'s policy to allow Big Tech's insurance comparison and recommendation service. Big Tech's entry into the insurance market, which has a large customer base and customer information, may threaten existing insurance companies. However, the financial authorities allow entry in stages, as is currently the case. Suppose we design and apply an appropriate regulatory system for permitted business activities. If this is done, the existing insurance industry and Big Tech can coexist while growing the pie in the insurance market, contrary to the insurance industry's concerns. Ultimately, it is expected that the competitiveness and financial inclusiveness of the insurance market will be strengthened due to Big Tech's entry into the insurance market. The FSC stated that insurance brokerage is possible for platform operators but limited the available services to comparing and recommending insurance products that fall under the recommendation, which is step 1 of the five steps of brokerage, and linking operators. Accordingly, if the three big tech companies start the above service, it is unclear whether this corresponds to insurance brokerage and whether insurance brokerage regulations can be applied. Insurance brokerage has different characteristics from other brokerages. Even if the concept of insurance brokerage is analyzed to determine the insurance brokerage of Big Tech's insurance product comparison·recommendation services and provider connection services, it takes work to identify brokerage due to the problems inherent in the 5-step brokerage theory of the FSC. Among the two interpretation theories presented in this paper, even if it is based on the negation theory of brokerage, considering the reality of the service provided by Big Tech and the need for responsibility, the concept of insurance brokerage is widely interpreted for Big Tech, leaving room for acknowledgment of brokerage. If the requirements for appearance liability are met, Big Tech should bear brokerage liability. In the case of future regulation through revision of the law, it is a desirable direction in the legal system to include Big Tech in the insurance intermediary regulations under the Commercial Act and Insurance Business Act rather than preparing regulations in the Electronic Financial Transactions Act. Also, we need to add insurance brokerage clauses in the insurance section of the Korean Commercial Act.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信