适用于恶性间皮瘤诊断的监督机器学习技术

Khin Yadanar Win, Noppadol Maneerat, S. Choomchuay, Syna Sreng, K. Hamamoto
{"title":"适用于恶性间皮瘤诊断的监督机器学习技术","authors":"Khin Yadanar Win, Noppadol Maneerat, S. Choomchuay, Syna Sreng, K. Hamamoto","doi":"10.1109/BMEICON.2018.8609935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Malignant Mesothelioma (MM) is a rare, aggressive cancer that grows in the lining of the internal organs such as lung, abdomen or heart. Fousing on MM diagnosis, in this paper, we investigate multiple machine learning methods and compare for accurate MM diagnosis results. Seven machine learning algorithms namely (i) Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), (ii) Naïve Bayes, (iii) K Nearest Neighborhood (KNN), (iv) Support Vector Machine (SVM), (v) Decision Tree (DT), (vi) Logistic Regression (LogR) and (vii) Random forest (RF) algorithms are exploited. The experiments dataset containing 324 cases with 34 features and six performance measures are used to assess the accuracy of evaluated classifiers. The average accuracy of LDA, NB, KNN, SVM, DT, LogR and RF are 61.73%, 67.90%, 91.36%, 100%, 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively. In addition, the computational complexity of each method is also analyzed. Each algoritm is judged based on its classification accuracy and computational complexity. It is found that SVM, DT, LogR and RF outperform the others and even previous studies.","PeriodicalId":232271,"journal":{"name":"2018 11th Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suitable Supervised Machine Learning Techniques For Malignant Mesothelioma Diagnosis\",\"authors\":\"Khin Yadanar Win, Noppadol Maneerat, S. Choomchuay, Syna Sreng, K. Hamamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BMEICON.2018.8609935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Malignant Mesothelioma (MM) is a rare, aggressive cancer that grows in the lining of the internal organs such as lung, abdomen or heart. Fousing on MM diagnosis, in this paper, we investigate multiple machine learning methods and compare for accurate MM diagnosis results. Seven machine learning algorithms namely (i) Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), (ii) Naïve Bayes, (iii) K Nearest Neighborhood (KNN), (iv) Support Vector Machine (SVM), (v) Decision Tree (DT), (vi) Logistic Regression (LogR) and (vii) Random forest (RF) algorithms are exploited. The experiments dataset containing 324 cases with 34 features and six performance measures are used to assess the accuracy of evaluated classifiers. The average accuracy of LDA, NB, KNN, SVM, DT, LogR and RF are 61.73%, 67.90%, 91.36%, 100%, 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively. In addition, the computational complexity of each method is also analyzed. Each algoritm is judged based on its classification accuracy and computational complexity. It is found that SVM, DT, LogR and RF outperform the others and even previous studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 11th Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 11th Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BMEICON.2018.8609935\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 11th Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BMEICON.2018.8609935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

恶性间皮瘤(MM)是一种罕见的侵袭性癌症,生长在肺、腹部或心脏等内脏器官的内壁。针对MM诊断,本文研究了多种机器学习方法,并比较了准确的MM诊断结果。七种机器学习算法,即(i)线性判别分析(LDA), (ii) Naïve贝叶斯,(iii) K最近邻(KNN), (iv)支持向量机(SVM), (v)决策树(DT), (vi)逻辑回归(LogR)和(vii)随机森林(RF)算法。实验数据集包含324个案例,34个特征和6个性能指标,用于评估被评估分类器的准确性。LDA、NB、KNN、SVM、DT、LogR和RF的平均准确率分别为61.73%、67.90%、91.36%、100%、100%、100%和100%。此外,还分析了每种方法的计算复杂度。根据分类精度和计算复杂度对每种算法进行评判。我们发现SVM、DT、LogR和RF都优于其他甚至前人的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Suitable Supervised Machine Learning Techniques For Malignant Mesothelioma Diagnosis
Malignant Mesothelioma (MM) is a rare, aggressive cancer that grows in the lining of the internal organs such as lung, abdomen or heart. Fousing on MM diagnosis, in this paper, we investigate multiple machine learning methods and compare for accurate MM diagnosis results. Seven machine learning algorithms namely (i) Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), (ii) Naïve Bayes, (iii) K Nearest Neighborhood (KNN), (iv) Support Vector Machine (SVM), (v) Decision Tree (DT), (vi) Logistic Regression (LogR) and (vii) Random forest (RF) algorithms are exploited. The experiments dataset containing 324 cases with 34 features and six performance measures are used to assess the accuracy of evaluated classifiers. The average accuracy of LDA, NB, KNN, SVM, DT, LogR and RF are 61.73%, 67.90%, 91.36%, 100%, 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively. In addition, the computational complexity of each method is also analyzed. Each algoritm is judged based on its classification accuracy and computational complexity. It is found that SVM, DT, LogR and RF outperform the others and even previous studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信