反垄断法中非中介服务平台的市场界定分析

Huimin Yu, Jiangling Liu
{"title":"反垄断法中非中介服务平台的市场界定分析","authors":"Huimin Yu, Jiangling Liu","doi":"10.56397/slj.2022.11.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The judgment of the definition of market to the Internet platform has become the focus of the implementation of the Antitrust Law, but due to the huge differences between the Internet platform and the traditional industry, the traditional method of the market definition has lost its due role. After an in-depth analysis of the existing types of Internet platform economy, a new classification method is proposed, that is, the Intermediary Trading Platform and the Non-intermediary Service Platform. Combined with the unique characteristics of Non-intermediary Service Platform, it is found that these characteristics cause many problems, such as the difficulty of choosing the benchmark services, the analysis dilemma of profit sources, the failure of the traditional SSNIP test method, and the challenge of cross-support power measurement. After comprehensively measure the above problems, based on the behaviorism mode, according to the characteristics of Non-intermediary Service Platform, in the market definition requires the combination of the platform’s service independence, traffic support relationship, profit ownership, select the benchmark services can reflect the platform or specific service anti-competition effect, and improve the SSNDQ test, make it more to frame the market scope, provide real alternative for the subsequent market dominance and abuse and concentration review of judgment.","PeriodicalId":377631,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Law and Justice","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the Market Definition of Non-Intermediary Service Platform in Antitrust Law\",\"authors\":\"Huimin Yu, Jiangling Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.56397/slj.2022.11.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The judgment of the definition of market to the Internet platform has become the focus of the implementation of the Antitrust Law, but due to the huge differences between the Internet platform and the traditional industry, the traditional method of the market definition has lost its due role. After an in-depth analysis of the existing types of Internet platform economy, a new classification method is proposed, that is, the Intermediary Trading Platform and the Non-intermediary Service Platform. Combined with the unique characteristics of Non-intermediary Service Platform, it is found that these characteristics cause many problems, such as the difficulty of choosing the benchmark services, the analysis dilemma of profit sources, the failure of the traditional SSNIP test method, and the challenge of cross-support power measurement. After comprehensively measure the above problems, based on the behaviorism mode, according to the characteristics of Non-intermediary Service Platform, in the market definition requires the combination of the platform’s service independence, traffic support relationship, profit ownership, select the benchmark services can reflect the platform or specific service anti-competition effect, and improve the SSNDQ test, make it more to frame the market scope, provide real alternative for the subsequent market dominance and abuse and concentration review of judgment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Law and Justice\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Law and Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56397/slj.2022.11.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Law and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56397/slj.2022.11.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对互联网平台的市场界定判断成为反垄断法实施的重点,但由于互联网平台与传统行业的巨大差异,传统的市场界定方法已经失去了应有的作用。在对现有互联网平台经济类型进行深入分析后,提出了一种新的分类方法,即中间交易平台和非中间服务平台。结合非中介服务平台的独特特点,发现这些特点导致基准服务选择困难、利润来源分析困境、传统SSNIP测试方法失效、跨支持功率测量面临挑战等诸多问题。综合衡量上述问题后,基于行为主义模式,根据非中介服务平台的特点,在市场界定中要求结合平台的服务独立性、流量支持关系、利润归属等,选择能够反映平台或特定服务反竞争效果的标杆服务,并完善SSNDQ检验,使其更能框架市场范围;为后续市场支配、滥用和集中审查的判断提供真实的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of the Market Definition of Non-Intermediary Service Platform in Antitrust Law
The judgment of the definition of market to the Internet platform has become the focus of the implementation of the Antitrust Law, but due to the huge differences between the Internet platform and the traditional industry, the traditional method of the market definition has lost its due role. After an in-depth analysis of the existing types of Internet platform economy, a new classification method is proposed, that is, the Intermediary Trading Platform and the Non-intermediary Service Platform. Combined with the unique characteristics of Non-intermediary Service Platform, it is found that these characteristics cause many problems, such as the difficulty of choosing the benchmark services, the analysis dilemma of profit sources, the failure of the traditional SSNIP test method, and the challenge of cross-support power measurement. After comprehensively measure the above problems, based on the behaviorism mode, according to the characteristics of Non-intermediary Service Platform, in the market definition requires the combination of the platform’s service independence, traffic support relationship, profit ownership, select the benchmark services can reflect the platform or specific service anti-competition effect, and improve the SSNDQ test, make it more to frame the market scope, provide real alternative for the subsequent market dominance and abuse and concentration review of judgment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信