善用“脏钱”

S. Lopez
{"title":"善用“脏钱”","authors":"S. Lopez","doi":"10.13185/1940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the ethical issues faced by many fundraising practitioners of non-government organizations worldwide is whether or not to raise monies from people or organizations whose practices of business or sources of income are morally questionable. Donor lists or potential funders of many a development organization usually include politicians, wealthy businessmen, and members of prominent families, if not the corporations owned by them. Often, these are the “prime targets” for fundraising campaigns because of their willingness to share and further the developmental mission of these NGOs, and because of their ability to provide substantial support. While many such benefactors are praiseworthy in their generosity and in their sense of social responsibility, there are, of course, some whose methods and sources of income are morally questionable. The possibility of illicit activity in the means by which these donors make a profit and obtain their income cannot be denied. Such can range from unjust labor practices to graft and corruption, illegal drug trade, gambling operations, and the like. The question then arises of the acceptability of using such “bad money” or money raised illicitly by others, and putting it to “good use” or towards a charitable organization’s noble ends. Naturally, the Church as a charitable and fundraising institution has not been immune to such an ethical dilemma. As time and again featured by the media, prominent Church-related individuals who are involved in work for the poor have supporters and benefactors who may include those in question. Some, like the Blessed Mother Teresa of Calcutta, the late Cardinal Sin, and the much awarded Tony Meloto of the Gawad Kalinga movement, are of the view that even monies from donors of ill repute can and should be received and put to good use. Others take the more conservative stance and try to avoid dependence on benefactors of questionable means and sources of income, while others conveniently turn a blind eye and will receive donations without wanting or bothering to know where these monies probably came from. This article will attempt to weigh the issue at hand using three frames of moral consideration, namely 1) cooperation with evil, 2) the appropriation of evil, and 3) the consideration of scandal. The first and third are among traditional principles in Catholic moral thought while the second is a more recently developed theory from the turn of the second millennium. All three will hopefully allow us to understand the pertinent considerations in addressing the question “Is it ethical for the Church to solicit and receive funds—to be used for unquestionably worthwhile purposes—from benefactors whose businesses or sources of income involve illicit activity?”","PeriodicalId":127392,"journal":{"name":"Landas: Journal of Loyola School of Theology","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Putting “Dirty Money” to Good Use\",\"authors\":\"S. Lopez\",\"doi\":\"10.13185/1940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Among the ethical issues faced by many fundraising practitioners of non-government organizations worldwide is whether or not to raise monies from people or organizations whose practices of business or sources of income are morally questionable. Donor lists or potential funders of many a development organization usually include politicians, wealthy businessmen, and members of prominent families, if not the corporations owned by them. Often, these are the “prime targets” for fundraising campaigns because of their willingness to share and further the developmental mission of these NGOs, and because of their ability to provide substantial support. While many such benefactors are praiseworthy in their generosity and in their sense of social responsibility, there are, of course, some whose methods and sources of income are morally questionable. The possibility of illicit activity in the means by which these donors make a profit and obtain their income cannot be denied. Such can range from unjust labor practices to graft and corruption, illegal drug trade, gambling operations, and the like. The question then arises of the acceptability of using such “bad money” or money raised illicitly by others, and putting it to “good use” or towards a charitable organization’s noble ends. Naturally, the Church as a charitable and fundraising institution has not been immune to such an ethical dilemma. As time and again featured by the media, prominent Church-related individuals who are involved in work for the poor have supporters and benefactors who may include those in question. Some, like the Blessed Mother Teresa of Calcutta, the late Cardinal Sin, and the much awarded Tony Meloto of the Gawad Kalinga movement, are of the view that even monies from donors of ill repute can and should be received and put to good use. Others take the more conservative stance and try to avoid dependence on benefactors of questionable means and sources of income, while others conveniently turn a blind eye and will receive donations without wanting or bothering to know where these monies probably came from. This article will attempt to weigh the issue at hand using three frames of moral consideration, namely 1) cooperation with evil, 2) the appropriation of evil, and 3) the consideration of scandal. The first and third are among traditional principles in Catholic moral thought while the second is a more recently developed theory from the turn of the second millennium. All three will hopefully allow us to understand the pertinent considerations in addressing the question “Is it ethical for the Church to solicit and receive funds—to be used for unquestionably worthwhile purposes—from benefactors whose businesses or sources of income involve illicit activity?”\",\"PeriodicalId\":127392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Landas: Journal of Loyola School of Theology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Landas: Journal of Loyola School of Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13185/1940\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landas: Journal of Loyola School of Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13185/1940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在世界范围内,许多非政府组织的筹款从业者面临的道德问题之一是,是否向那些业务或收入来源存在道德问题的人或组织筹集资金。许多发展组织的捐助者名单或潜在资助者通常包括政治家、富有的商人和显赫家族的成员,如果不是他们拥有的公司的话。这些人往往是筹款活动的“主要目标”,因为他们愿意分享和推动这些非政府组织的发展使命,因为他们有能力提供实质性的支持。虽然许多这样的捐助者的慷慨和社会责任感值得称赞,但当然,也有一些人的方法和收入来源在道德上值得怀疑。不能否认这些捐助者在获取利润和收入的手段中存在非法活动的可能性。这些问题包括不公正的劳动行为、贪污腐败、非法毒品交易、赌博等。那么问题来了,是否可以接受使用这些“坏钱”或他人非法筹集的钱,并将其“善用”或用于慈善组织的高尚目的。当然,教会作为一个慈善和筹款机构也不能幸免于这种道德困境。正如媒体一次又一次地报道的那样,与教会有关的知名人士参与了为穷人服务的工作,他们的支持者和捐助者可能包括这些人。有些人,比如加尔各答的特蕾莎修女、已故的枢机主教辛恩,以及广受赞誉的加瓦德·卡林加运动的托尼·梅洛托,都认为,即使是来自名声不佳的捐赠者的钱,也可以而且应该被接受,并被好好利用。另一些人则采取更保守的立场,尽量避免依赖有问题的手段和收入来源的捐助者,而另一些人则方便地睁一只眼闭一只眼,接受捐款,而不想或懒得知道这些钱可能来自哪里。本文将尝试用三个道德考虑框架来权衡手头的问题,即1)与邪恶合作,2)挪用邪恶,3)考虑丑闻。第一个和第三个是天主教道德思想的传统原则,而第二个是在第二个千年之交发展起来的理论。这三件事都希望能让我们理解在解决这个问题时的相关考虑:“教会从那些业务或收入来源涉及非法活动的捐助者那里募集和接受资金——用于毫无疑问是有价值的目的——是否合乎道德?”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Putting “Dirty Money” to Good Use
Among the ethical issues faced by many fundraising practitioners of non-government organizations worldwide is whether or not to raise monies from people or organizations whose practices of business or sources of income are morally questionable. Donor lists or potential funders of many a development organization usually include politicians, wealthy businessmen, and members of prominent families, if not the corporations owned by them. Often, these are the “prime targets” for fundraising campaigns because of their willingness to share and further the developmental mission of these NGOs, and because of their ability to provide substantial support. While many such benefactors are praiseworthy in their generosity and in their sense of social responsibility, there are, of course, some whose methods and sources of income are morally questionable. The possibility of illicit activity in the means by which these donors make a profit and obtain their income cannot be denied. Such can range from unjust labor practices to graft and corruption, illegal drug trade, gambling operations, and the like. The question then arises of the acceptability of using such “bad money” or money raised illicitly by others, and putting it to “good use” or towards a charitable organization’s noble ends. Naturally, the Church as a charitable and fundraising institution has not been immune to such an ethical dilemma. As time and again featured by the media, prominent Church-related individuals who are involved in work for the poor have supporters and benefactors who may include those in question. Some, like the Blessed Mother Teresa of Calcutta, the late Cardinal Sin, and the much awarded Tony Meloto of the Gawad Kalinga movement, are of the view that even monies from donors of ill repute can and should be received and put to good use. Others take the more conservative stance and try to avoid dependence on benefactors of questionable means and sources of income, while others conveniently turn a blind eye and will receive donations without wanting or bothering to know where these monies probably came from. This article will attempt to weigh the issue at hand using three frames of moral consideration, namely 1) cooperation with evil, 2) the appropriation of evil, and 3) the consideration of scandal. The first and third are among traditional principles in Catholic moral thought while the second is a more recently developed theory from the turn of the second millennium. All three will hopefully allow us to understand the pertinent considerations in addressing the question “Is it ethical for the Church to solicit and receive funds—to be used for unquestionably worthwhile purposes—from benefactors whose businesses or sources of income involve illicit activity?”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信