学生对儿童牙科行为指导技术在整个五年牙科课程的看法

Rosa Virginia Dutra de Oliveira, Anna Carolina Barbosa Ângelo, Deborah Brindeiro de Araújo Brito, Rubênia Cristina Gomes de Medeiros, F. Forte, S. A. Sousa
{"title":"学生对儿童牙科行为指导技术在整个五年牙科课程的看法","authors":"Rosa Virginia Dutra de Oliveira, Anna Carolina Barbosa Ângelo, Deborah Brindeiro de Araújo Brito, Rubênia Cristina Gomes de Medeiros, F. Forte, S. A. Sousa","doi":"10.4034/PBOCI.2015.151.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare students’ views about behavior management techniques (BMT) in pediatric dentistry, besides to identify whether educational components of dental curriculum may influence their perceptions. Material and Methods: Questionnaires with 18 statements, describing the techniques and clinical situations were distributed to students (n=83) from first- (P1), third- (P2) and eighth- (P3) semesters. Student’s acceptability scores were measured with a Likert scale from 0 (total disagreement) to 10 (total agreement). Statistical analysis was performed using Mann Whitney U test. Results: P3 students agreed with most of BMTs. Pair comparisons between P1-P2 showed significant increase of means for Told treatment may involve pain and Sedative, besides significant decrease for Use of euphemisms. Comparisons between P2-P3 and P1-P3 indicated significant increase in the acceptability for: Voice control, Told not to be coward, Modeling, Blunting, Use of euphemisms, Parent not present, HOME, Active and Passive Immobilization and pharmacologic techniques. In all semesters, Verbal positive reinforcement, Distraction and Tell-show-do were the most accepted techniques, however, there was no consensus regarding to the least accepted one. Promising a toy became less acceptable throughout the semesters and Parent not present became more acceptable. Conclusion: These findings indicate that educational process may influence on the students’ perceptions about BMTs.","PeriodicalId":134552,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Research in Pediatric Dentistry and Integrated Clinic","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student’s Perceptions about Pediatric Dental Behavior Guidance Techniques throughout a five-year Dental Curriculum\",\"authors\":\"Rosa Virginia Dutra de Oliveira, Anna Carolina Barbosa Ângelo, Deborah Brindeiro de Araújo Brito, Rubênia Cristina Gomes de Medeiros, F. Forte, S. A. Sousa\",\"doi\":\"10.4034/PBOCI.2015.151.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare students’ views about behavior management techniques (BMT) in pediatric dentistry, besides to identify whether educational components of dental curriculum may influence their perceptions. Material and Methods: Questionnaires with 18 statements, describing the techniques and clinical situations were distributed to students (n=83) from first- (P1), third- (P2) and eighth- (P3) semesters. Student’s acceptability scores were measured with a Likert scale from 0 (total disagreement) to 10 (total agreement). Statistical analysis was performed using Mann Whitney U test. Results: P3 students agreed with most of BMTs. Pair comparisons between P1-P2 showed significant increase of means for Told treatment may involve pain and Sedative, besides significant decrease for Use of euphemisms. Comparisons between P2-P3 and P1-P3 indicated significant increase in the acceptability for: Voice control, Told not to be coward, Modeling, Blunting, Use of euphemisms, Parent not present, HOME, Active and Passive Immobilization and pharmacologic techniques. In all semesters, Verbal positive reinforcement, Distraction and Tell-show-do were the most accepted techniques, however, there was no consensus regarding to the least accepted one. Promising a toy became less acceptable throughout the semesters and Parent not present became more acceptable. Conclusion: These findings indicate that educational process may influence on the students’ perceptions about BMTs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Research in Pediatric Dentistry and Integrated Clinic\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Research in Pediatric Dentistry and Integrated Clinic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4034/PBOCI.2015.151.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Research in Pediatric Dentistry and Integrated Clinic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4034/PBOCI.2015.151.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:比较学生对儿童牙科行为管理技术(BMT)的看法,并确定牙科课程的教育成分是否会影响他们的看法。材料与方法:从第一学期(P1),第三学期(P2)和第八学期(P3)向学生(n=83)分发了18份问卷,描述了技术和临床情况。学生的可接受性得分用李克特量表从0(完全不同意)到10(完全同意)测量。采用Mann Whitney U检验进行统计学分析。结果:P3组学生对大部分BMTs表示认同。P1-P2组的配对比较显示,患者使用镇痛和镇静治疗的方式显著增加,委婉语的使用显著减少。P2-P3和P1-P3的比较表明,语音控制、被告知不要懦弱、建模、钝化、委婉语的使用、父母不在场、HOME、主动和被动固定以及药物技术的可接受性显著提高。在所有学期中,口头积极强化、分散注意力和告诉-展示-做是最被接受的技巧,然而,对于最不被接受的技巧,人们没有达成共识。在整个学期中,许诺给孩子一个玩具变得不那么容易被接受,而家长不在场变得更容易被接受。结论:教育过程可能影响学生对BMTs的认知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Student’s Perceptions about Pediatric Dental Behavior Guidance Techniques throughout a five-year Dental Curriculum
Objective: To compare students’ views about behavior management techniques (BMT) in pediatric dentistry, besides to identify whether educational components of dental curriculum may influence their perceptions. Material and Methods: Questionnaires with 18 statements, describing the techniques and clinical situations were distributed to students (n=83) from first- (P1), third- (P2) and eighth- (P3) semesters. Student’s acceptability scores were measured with a Likert scale from 0 (total disagreement) to 10 (total agreement). Statistical analysis was performed using Mann Whitney U test. Results: P3 students agreed with most of BMTs. Pair comparisons between P1-P2 showed significant increase of means for Told treatment may involve pain and Sedative, besides significant decrease for Use of euphemisms. Comparisons between P2-P3 and P1-P3 indicated significant increase in the acceptability for: Voice control, Told not to be coward, Modeling, Blunting, Use of euphemisms, Parent not present, HOME, Active and Passive Immobilization and pharmacologic techniques. In all semesters, Verbal positive reinforcement, Distraction and Tell-show-do were the most accepted techniques, however, there was no consensus regarding to the least accepted one. Promising a toy became less acceptable throughout the semesters and Parent not present became more acceptable. Conclusion: These findings indicate that educational process may influence on the students’ perceptions about BMTs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信