威廉·詹姆斯论实用主义的真理观与人类知识:一种改革性的反思

Jadi Sampurna Lima
{"title":"威廉·詹姆斯论实用主义的真理观与人类知识:一种改革性的反思","authors":"Jadi Sampurna Lima","doi":"10.51688/vc5.2.2018.art1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At a glance, William James’ conception of truth in epistemology, especially in its critique of Modernism’s a-temporal, a-contextual, and absolutist conception of truth sounds very similar with a critique from Herman Dooyeweerd of the Reformational tradition. In this article, I would show what those similarities are and how the two systems are radically different. This research may be significant for Pragmatism is widely known and accepted in the late 20th century and well into the 21st century. Pragmatism is quite successful in grounding the elitist and abstract discourse of the academia to its daily contexts. \nKEYWORDS: James; Dooyeweerd; Truth; Pragmatism; Refomational Epistemology.","PeriodicalId":129165,"journal":{"name":"VERBUM CHRISTI: JURNAL TEOLOGI REFORMED INJILI","volume":"191 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WILLIAM JAMES ON THE PRAGMATIC CONCEPTION OF TRUTH AND HUMAN KNOWLEDGE: A REFORMATIONAL REFLECTION\",\"authors\":\"Jadi Sampurna Lima\",\"doi\":\"10.51688/vc5.2.2018.art1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At a glance, William James’ conception of truth in epistemology, especially in its critique of Modernism’s a-temporal, a-contextual, and absolutist conception of truth sounds very similar with a critique from Herman Dooyeweerd of the Reformational tradition. In this article, I would show what those similarities are and how the two systems are radically different. This research may be significant for Pragmatism is widely known and accepted in the late 20th century and well into the 21st century. Pragmatism is quite successful in grounding the elitist and abstract discourse of the academia to its daily contexts. \\nKEYWORDS: James; Dooyeweerd; Truth; Pragmatism; Refomational Epistemology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VERBUM CHRISTI: JURNAL TEOLOGI REFORMED INJILI\",\"volume\":\"191 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VERBUM CHRISTI: JURNAL TEOLOGI REFORMED INJILI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51688/vc5.2.2018.art1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VERBUM CHRISTI: JURNAL TEOLOGI REFORMED INJILI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51688/vc5.2.2018.art1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乍一看,威廉·詹姆斯在认识论中的真理概念,尤其是对现代主义的非时间、非语境和绝对主义真理概念的批判,听起来与赫尔曼·杜耶韦尔德对宗教改革传统的批判非常相似。在本文中,我将展示这些相似之处,以及这两个系统的根本不同之处。这一研究可能对实用主义在20世纪末和21世纪被广泛认识和接受具有重要意义。实用主义非常成功地将学术界的精英主义和抽象话语根植于其日常语境。关键词:詹姆斯;Dooyeweerd;真理;实用主义;Refomational认识论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
WILLIAM JAMES ON THE PRAGMATIC CONCEPTION OF TRUTH AND HUMAN KNOWLEDGE: A REFORMATIONAL REFLECTION
At a glance, William James’ conception of truth in epistemology, especially in its critique of Modernism’s a-temporal, a-contextual, and absolutist conception of truth sounds very similar with a critique from Herman Dooyeweerd of the Reformational tradition. In this article, I would show what those similarities are and how the two systems are radically different. This research may be significant for Pragmatism is widely known and accepted in the late 20th century and well into the 21st century. Pragmatism is quite successful in grounding the elitist and abstract discourse of the academia to its daily contexts. KEYWORDS: James; Dooyeweerd; Truth; Pragmatism; Refomational Epistemology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信