软件成本和质量模型的贝叶斯分析

S. Chulani
{"title":"软件成本和质量模型的贝叶斯分析","authors":"S. Chulani","doi":"10.1109/ICSM.2001.972773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the pervasive nature of software, software-engineering practitioners have continuously expressed their concerns over their inability to accurately predict the cost, schedule and quality of a software product under development. Thus, one of the most important objectives of the software engineering community has been to develop useful models that constructively explain the software development lifecycle and accurately predict the cost, schedule and quality of developing a software product. Most of the existing parametric models have been empirically calibrated to actual data from completed software projects. The most commonly used technique for empirical calibration has been the popular classical multiple regression approach. This approach imposes a few restrictions often violated by software engineering data and has resulted in the development of inaccurate empirical models that do not perform very well. The focus of this dissertation is to explain the drawbacks of the multiple regression approach for software engineering data and discuss the Bayesian approach which alleviates a few of the problems faced by the multiple regression approach.","PeriodicalId":160032,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance. ICSM 2001","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"80","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bayesian analysis of software cost and quality models\",\"authors\":\"S. Chulani\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSM.2001.972773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to the pervasive nature of software, software-engineering practitioners have continuously expressed their concerns over their inability to accurately predict the cost, schedule and quality of a software product under development. Thus, one of the most important objectives of the software engineering community has been to develop useful models that constructively explain the software development lifecycle and accurately predict the cost, schedule and quality of developing a software product. Most of the existing parametric models have been empirically calibrated to actual data from completed software projects. The most commonly used technique for empirical calibration has been the popular classical multiple regression approach. This approach imposes a few restrictions often violated by software engineering data and has resulted in the development of inaccurate empirical models that do not perform very well. The focus of this dissertation is to explain the drawbacks of the multiple regression approach for software engineering data and discuss the Bayesian approach which alleviates a few of the problems faced by the multiple regression approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":160032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance. ICSM 2001\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"80\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance. ICSM 2001\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2001.972773\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance. ICSM 2001","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2001.972773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 80

摘要

由于软件的普遍性,软件工程从业者不断地表达他们对无法准确预测开发中的软件产品的成本、进度和质量的担忧。因此,软件工程社区最重要的目标之一是开发有用的模型,这些模型可以建设性地解释软件开发生命周期,并准确地预测开发软件产品的成本、进度和质量。大多数现有的参数化模型已经根据已完成的软件项目的实际数据进行了经验校准。最常用的经验校准技术是流行的经典多元回归方法。这种方法施加了一些软件工程数据经常违反的限制,并导致开发不准确的经验模型,这些模型不能很好地执行。本文的重点是解释软件工程数据的多元回归方法的缺点,并讨论贝叶斯方法,它减轻了多元回归方法面临的一些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bayesian analysis of software cost and quality models
Due to the pervasive nature of software, software-engineering practitioners have continuously expressed their concerns over their inability to accurately predict the cost, schedule and quality of a software product under development. Thus, one of the most important objectives of the software engineering community has been to develop useful models that constructively explain the software development lifecycle and accurately predict the cost, schedule and quality of developing a software product. Most of the existing parametric models have been empirically calibrated to actual data from completed software projects. The most commonly used technique for empirical calibration has been the popular classical multiple regression approach. This approach imposes a few restrictions often violated by software engineering data and has resulted in the development of inaccurate empirical models that do not perform very well. The focus of this dissertation is to explain the drawbacks of the multiple regression approach for software engineering data and discuss the Bayesian approach which alleviates a few of the problems faced by the multiple regression approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信