Ma. Loren Josephine Lantin, Mamer Rosario, John Ricardo Chua, A. Alomesen, Mahima Jose, Geoffrey Battad
{"title":"发展中国家2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)时期肢体肿瘤的早期术后结局——肢体保留是一种可行的选择吗?","authors":"Ma. Loren Josephine Lantin, Mamer Rosario, John Ricardo Chua, A. Alomesen, Mahima Jose, Geoffrey Battad","doi":"10.31557/apjcc.2023.8.2.281-279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: With advancements in surgical techniques and adjuvant therapies, limb salvage (LS) has replaced amputation as the dominant treatment model for malignancies involving the extremities. But the COVID-19 pandemic has drastically affected cancer care especially in developing countries, with treatment delays possibly leading to a rise in amputations. Due to a lack of consensus regarding the ideal course of treatment for tumors involving the extremities in the current situation, the present study aimed to evaluate perioperative and short- term functional outcomes following LS surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A single-institutional series of 45 patients who underwent surgical resection for extremity tumors and followed for at least 6 weeks after operation were included. We analyzed patients according to whether one had LS or major amputation during surgery, and compared intraoperative blood loss, operative duration, perioperative complication rates, COVID-19 infection rates, and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores during last follow-up, between the two groups. Results: The LS group (n=21) had significantly longer operative duration (323 min vs. 214 min, p=.004) but higher MSTS scores (81% vs. 49%, p=.001) than the amputation group (n=24). Intraoperative blood loss (1113 mL vs. 779 mL, p=.46), superficial infection rates (14% vs. 8%, p=.12), and COVID-19 infection rates (14% vs. 29%, p=.23) were similar between the two groups. Conclusion: The authors conclude that LS surgery can be a viable option for treating tumors involving the extremities especially in developing countries in the COVID-19 era.","PeriodicalId":436394,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Postoperative Outcomes of Extremity Tumors During the COVID-19 Era in a Developing Country – Is Limb Salvage a Viable Option?\",\"authors\":\"Ma. Loren Josephine Lantin, Mamer Rosario, John Ricardo Chua, A. Alomesen, Mahima Jose, Geoffrey Battad\",\"doi\":\"10.31557/apjcc.2023.8.2.281-279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: With advancements in surgical techniques and adjuvant therapies, limb salvage (LS) has replaced amputation as the dominant treatment model for malignancies involving the extremities. But the COVID-19 pandemic has drastically affected cancer care especially in developing countries, with treatment delays possibly leading to a rise in amputations. Due to a lack of consensus regarding the ideal course of treatment for tumors involving the extremities in the current situation, the present study aimed to evaluate perioperative and short- term functional outcomes following LS surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A single-institutional series of 45 patients who underwent surgical resection for extremity tumors and followed for at least 6 weeks after operation were included. We analyzed patients according to whether one had LS or major amputation during surgery, and compared intraoperative blood loss, operative duration, perioperative complication rates, COVID-19 infection rates, and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores during last follow-up, between the two groups. Results: The LS group (n=21) had significantly longer operative duration (323 min vs. 214 min, p=.004) but higher MSTS scores (81% vs. 49%, p=.001) than the amputation group (n=24). Intraoperative blood loss (1113 mL vs. 779 mL, p=.46), superficial infection rates (14% vs. 8%, p=.12), and COVID-19 infection rates (14% vs. 29%, p=.23) were similar between the two groups. Conclusion: The authors conclude that LS surgery can be a viable option for treating tumors involving the extremities especially in developing countries in the COVID-19 era.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcc.2023.8.2.281-279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcc.2023.8.2.281-279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:随着手术技术和辅助治疗的进步,肢体保留(LS)已经取代截肢成为四肢恶性肿瘤的主要治疗模式。但COVID-19大流行严重影响了癌症治疗,特别是在发展中国家,治疗延误可能导致截肢病例增加。由于目前对累及四肢肿瘤的理想治疗方案缺乏共识,本研究旨在评估COVID-19大流行期间LS手术后的围手术期和短期功能结局。方法:对45例接受手术切除四肢肿瘤并术后随访至少6周的患者进行单机构系列研究。我们根据患者在手术中是否发生LS或大截肢来分析患者,并比较两组患者术中出血量、手术时间、围手术期并发症发生率、COVID-19感染率和最后一次随访时肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会(MSTS)评分。结果:LS组(n=21)手术时间明显长于截肢组(n=24) (323 min vs. 214 min, p= 0.004), MSTS评分明显高于截肢组(n=24) (81% vs. 49%, p= 0.001)。两组术中出血量(1113 mL vs. 779 mL, p= 0.46)、表面感染率(14% vs. 8%, p= 0.12)和COVID-19感染率(14% vs. 29%, p= 0.23)相似。结论:作者得出结论,LS手术可以成为治疗涉及四肢肿瘤的可行选择,特别是在COVID-19时代的发展中国家。
Early Postoperative Outcomes of Extremity Tumors During the COVID-19 Era in a Developing Country – Is Limb Salvage a Viable Option?
Background: With advancements in surgical techniques and adjuvant therapies, limb salvage (LS) has replaced amputation as the dominant treatment model for malignancies involving the extremities. But the COVID-19 pandemic has drastically affected cancer care especially in developing countries, with treatment delays possibly leading to a rise in amputations. Due to a lack of consensus regarding the ideal course of treatment for tumors involving the extremities in the current situation, the present study aimed to evaluate perioperative and short- term functional outcomes following LS surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A single-institutional series of 45 patients who underwent surgical resection for extremity tumors and followed for at least 6 weeks after operation were included. We analyzed patients according to whether one had LS or major amputation during surgery, and compared intraoperative blood loss, operative duration, perioperative complication rates, COVID-19 infection rates, and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores during last follow-up, between the two groups. Results: The LS group (n=21) had significantly longer operative duration (323 min vs. 214 min, p=.004) but higher MSTS scores (81% vs. 49%, p=.001) than the amputation group (n=24). Intraoperative blood loss (1113 mL vs. 779 mL, p=.46), superficial infection rates (14% vs. 8%, p=.12), and COVID-19 infection rates (14% vs. 29%, p=.23) were similar between the two groups. Conclusion: The authors conclude that LS surgery can be a viable option for treating tumors involving the extremities especially in developing countries in the COVID-19 era.