通过电缆进行填砂清洗,可以进入气井生产井的其他射孔区域

D. Field
{"title":"通过电缆进行填砂清洗,可以进入气井生产井的其他射孔区域","authors":"D. Field","doi":"10.2523/iptc-23048-ea","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An Australian operator wanted to explore options for wireline conveyed sand bailing in one of their offshore platform gas producing wells. The objective was to remove twenty-six meters of sand fill inside 9.625\" production casing, with an internal diameter of 8.681\". Due to the landing nipple at the end of the tubing, the minimum run-in-hole restriction of the production tubing string was 3.987\".\n To limit the number of clean out runs, the latest technology in e-line deployed suction tools with a 4.25\" OD was chosen, which provided increased recovery volume over its smaller cousins, plus real-time surface control and monitoring. Because of the tool's overall diameter, the landing nipple also required milling to allow access. Therefore, a specially designed 4.412\" mill bit was manufactured and run on a milling tool – a tool requiring tractor conveyance to provide weight-on-bit and counter the reactive torque.\n As the well had low deviation, the subsequent clean-out toolstring was run standalone (without tractor). One of the key factors governing the feasibility of conducting this operation on e-line was the overall toolstring lengths, where the lubricator height was limited to approximately sixteen meters.\n The e-line deployed milling technology – which produces a grinding action rather than cutting – successfully milled through the landing nipple and a ball catcher in four runs, thus increasing the internal diameter sufficiently to allow access for the clean-out toolstring. A well fluid column of about seven bar is required to enable operation of the suction tool. The clean out tool was configured with three bailer sections (seven max) for the first run, to determine sand recovery optimisation. Three different sizes of micron bailer filters are provided; prior knowledge of debris particle size is therefore advantageous. In this case, a slickline bailing sand sample had been recovered, which immediately aided filter choice. Seventeen bailing runs were conducted over five days (with the number of bailer sections increased to six), successfully recovering a total of 918 litres of sand, equating to about 2.4 tons. Ultimately, the process enabled perforation of two additional gas zones to increase production.\n The e-line toolstring, consisting of six different sensors and robotic tools, made this a more controllable and inherently safer operation than coiled tubing methods, as well as having a smaller footprint with reduced environmental impact. Operational details, including job planning and lessons learned will be discussed in the extended abstract.","PeriodicalId":283978,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Wed, March 01, 2023","volume":"145 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sand Fill Clean-Out on Wireline Enables Access to Additional Perforation Zones in Gas Well Producer\",\"authors\":\"D. Field\",\"doi\":\"10.2523/iptc-23048-ea\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An Australian operator wanted to explore options for wireline conveyed sand bailing in one of their offshore platform gas producing wells. The objective was to remove twenty-six meters of sand fill inside 9.625\\\" production casing, with an internal diameter of 8.681\\\". Due to the landing nipple at the end of the tubing, the minimum run-in-hole restriction of the production tubing string was 3.987\\\".\\n To limit the number of clean out runs, the latest technology in e-line deployed suction tools with a 4.25\\\" OD was chosen, which provided increased recovery volume over its smaller cousins, plus real-time surface control and monitoring. Because of the tool's overall diameter, the landing nipple also required milling to allow access. Therefore, a specially designed 4.412\\\" mill bit was manufactured and run on a milling tool – a tool requiring tractor conveyance to provide weight-on-bit and counter the reactive torque.\\n As the well had low deviation, the subsequent clean-out toolstring was run standalone (without tractor). One of the key factors governing the feasibility of conducting this operation on e-line was the overall toolstring lengths, where the lubricator height was limited to approximately sixteen meters.\\n The e-line deployed milling technology – which produces a grinding action rather than cutting – successfully milled through the landing nipple and a ball catcher in four runs, thus increasing the internal diameter sufficiently to allow access for the clean-out toolstring. A well fluid column of about seven bar is required to enable operation of the suction tool. The clean out tool was configured with three bailer sections (seven max) for the first run, to determine sand recovery optimisation. Three different sizes of micron bailer filters are provided; prior knowledge of debris particle size is therefore advantageous. In this case, a slickline bailing sand sample had been recovered, which immediately aided filter choice. Seventeen bailing runs were conducted over five days (with the number of bailer sections increased to six), successfully recovering a total of 918 litres of sand, equating to about 2.4 tons. Ultimately, the process enabled perforation of two additional gas zones to increase production.\\n The e-line toolstring, consisting of six different sensors and robotic tools, made this a more controllable and inherently safer operation than coiled tubing methods, as well as having a smaller footprint with reduced environmental impact. Operational details, including job planning and lessons learned will be discussed in the extended abstract.\",\"PeriodicalId\":283978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Wed, March 01, 2023\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Wed, March 01, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-23048-ea\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Wed, March 01, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-23048-ea","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一家澳大利亚运营商希望在其海上平台气井中探索电缆输送出砂方案。目标是清除9.625”内径为8.681”的生产套管内26米的填砂层。由于下放短节位于油管末端,因此生产管柱的最小入井限制为3.987”。为了限制清洗次数,选择了最新技术的4.25”外径的e-line抽吸工具,该工具比其他小工具提供了更大的采收率,并提供了实时地面控制和监测。由于工具的总直径较大,着陆短节也需要铣削才能进入。因此,专门设计的4.412”磨铣钻头被制造出来,并在磨铣工具上下入,这种工具需要牵引车运输来提供钻头重量并抵消反扭矩。由于井斜较小,后续的洗井工具串是单独下入的(没有牵引器)。控制在线作业可行性的关键因素之一是整个工具串的长度,其中润滑器的高度限制在大约16米。e-line采用磨铣技术,通过磨铣而不是切削,在四趟下入中成功磨穿了着陆短节和接球器,从而增加了内径,足以进入清洗工具串。为了使抽吸工具能够运行,需要大约7巴的井液柱。在第一次下入时,该清理工具配置了3个桶段(最多7个),以确定砂回收优化。提供三种不同尺寸的微米滚筒过滤器;因此,对碎屑粒度的先验知识是有利的。在这种情况下,已经回收了一个钢丝绳打砂样品,这立即有助于过滤器的选择。在5天内进行了17次打砂作业(打砂段增加到6段),成功回收了918升沙子,相当于约2.4吨。最终,该工艺实现了两个额外气层的射孔,以提高产量。e-line工具串由6个不同的传感器和机器人工具组成,比连续油管方法更可控,更安全,占地面积更小,对环境的影响也更小。业务细节,包括工作规划和经验教训将在扩展摘要中讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sand Fill Clean-Out on Wireline Enables Access to Additional Perforation Zones in Gas Well Producer
An Australian operator wanted to explore options for wireline conveyed sand bailing in one of their offshore platform gas producing wells. The objective was to remove twenty-six meters of sand fill inside 9.625" production casing, with an internal diameter of 8.681". Due to the landing nipple at the end of the tubing, the minimum run-in-hole restriction of the production tubing string was 3.987". To limit the number of clean out runs, the latest technology in e-line deployed suction tools with a 4.25" OD was chosen, which provided increased recovery volume over its smaller cousins, plus real-time surface control and monitoring. Because of the tool's overall diameter, the landing nipple also required milling to allow access. Therefore, a specially designed 4.412" mill bit was manufactured and run on a milling tool – a tool requiring tractor conveyance to provide weight-on-bit and counter the reactive torque. As the well had low deviation, the subsequent clean-out toolstring was run standalone (without tractor). One of the key factors governing the feasibility of conducting this operation on e-line was the overall toolstring lengths, where the lubricator height was limited to approximately sixteen meters. The e-line deployed milling technology – which produces a grinding action rather than cutting – successfully milled through the landing nipple and a ball catcher in four runs, thus increasing the internal diameter sufficiently to allow access for the clean-out toolstring. A well fluid column of about seven bar is required to enable operation of the suction tool. The clean out tool was configured with three bailer sections (seven max) for the first run, to determine sand recovery optimisation. Three different sizes of micron bailer filters are provided; prior knowledge of debris particle size is therefore advantageous. In this case, a slickline bailing sand sample had been recovered, which immediately aided filter choice. Seventeen bailing runs were conducted over five days (with the number of bailer sections increased to six), successfully recovering a total of 918 litres of sand, equating to about 2.4 tons. Ultimately, the process enabled perforation of two additional gas zones to increase production. The e-line toolstring, consisting of six different sensors and robotic tools, made this a more controllable and inherently safer operation than coiled tubing methods, as well as having a smaller footprint with reduced environmental impact. Operational details, including job planning and lessons learned will be discussed in the extended abstract.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信