{"title":"内生分类的选择","authors":"Andrew Ellis, Yusufcan Masatlioglu","doi":"10.1093/RESTUD/RDAB011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose a novel categorical thinking model (CTM) where the framing of the decision problem affects how the agent categorizes each product, and the product's category affects her evaluation of the product. We show that a number of prominent models of salience, status quo bias, loss-aversion, inequality aversion, and present bias all fit under the umbrella of CTM. This suggests categorization as an underlying mechanism for key departures from the neoclassical model of choice and an account for diverse sets of evidence that are anomalous from its perspective. We specialize CTM to provide a behavioral foundation for the salient thinking model of Bordalo et al. (2013), highlighting its strong predictions and distinctions from other existing models.","PeriodicalId":143159,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Theoretical Economics","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choice with Endogenous Categorization\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Ellis, Yusufcan Masatlioglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/RESTUD/RDAB011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We propose a novel categorical thinking model (CTM) where the framing of the decision problem affects how the agent categorizes each product, and the product's category affects her evaluation of the product. We show that a number of prominent models of salience, status quo bias, loss-aversion, inequality aversion, and present bias all fit under the umbrella of CTM. This suggests categorization as an underlying mechanism for key departures from the neoclassical model of choice and an account for diverse sets of evidence that are anomalous from its perspective. We specialize CTM to provide a behavioral foundation for the salient thinking model of Bordalo et al. (2013), highlighting its strong predictions and distinctions from other existing models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv: Theoretical Economics\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv: Theoretical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/RESTUD/RDAB011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/RESTUD/RDAB011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
摘要
我们提出了一种新的分类思维模型(CTM),其中决策问题的框架影响代理如何对每个产品进行分类,而产品的类别影响代理对产品的评估。我们证明了一些突出的模型,包括突出性、现状偏见、损失厌恶、不平等厌恶和当前偏见,都适合在CTM的保护下。这表明,分类是偏离新古典选择模型的一种潜在机制,也是解释从新古典选择模型角度来看反常的各种证据的一种解释。我们将CTM专业化,为Bordalo et al.(2013)的突出思维模型提供行为基础,突出其强大的预测能力和与其他现有模型的区别。
We propose a novel categorical thinking model (CTM) where the framing of the decision problem affects how the agent categorizes each product, and the product's category affects her evaluation of the product. We show that a number of prominent models of salience, status quo bias, loss-aversion, inequality aversion, and present bias all fit under the umbrella of CTM. This suggests categorization as an underlying mechanism for key departures from the neoclassical model of choice and an account for diverse sets of evidence that are anomalous from its perspective. We specialize CTM to provide a behavioral foundation for the salient thinking model of Bordalo et al. (2013), highlighting its strong predictions and distinctions from other existing models.