内生分类的选择

Andrew Ellis, Yusufcan Masatlioglu
{"title":"内生分类的选择","authors":"Andrew Ellis, Yusufcan Masatlioglu","doi":"10.1093/RESTUD/RDAB011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose a novel categorical thinking model (CTM) where the framing of the decision problem affects how the agent categorizes each product, and the product's category affects her evaluation of the product. We show that a number of prominent models of salience, status quo bias, loss-aversion, inequality aversion, and present bias all fit under the umbrella of CTM. This suggests categorization as an underlying mechanism for key departures from the neoclassical model of choice and an account for diverse sets of evidence that are anomalous from its perspective. We specialize CTM to provide a behavioral foundation for the salient thinking model of Bordalo et al. (2013), highlighting its strong predictions and distinctions from other existing models.","PeriodicalId":143159,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Theoretical Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choice with Endogenous Categorization\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Ellis, Yusufcan Masatlioglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/RESTUD/RDAB011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We propose a novel categorical thinking model (CTM) where the framing of the decision problem affects how the agent categorizes each product, and the product's category affects her evaluation of the product. We show that a number of prominent models of salience, status quo bias, loss-aversion, inequality aversion, and present bias all fit under the umbrella of CTM. This suggests categorization as an underlying mechanism for key departures from the neoclassical model of choice and an account for diverse sets of evidence that are anomalous from its perspective. We specialize CTM to provide a behavioral foundation for the salient thinking model of Bordalo et al. (2013), highlighting its strong predictions and distinctions from other existing models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv: Theoretical Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv: Theoretical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/RESTUD/RDAB011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/RESTUD/RDAB011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

我们提出了一种新的分类思维模型(CTM),其中决策问题的框架影响代理如何对每个产品进行分类,而产品的类别影响代理对产品的评估。我们证明了一些突出的模型,包括突出性、现状偏见、损失厌恶、不平等厌恶和当前偏见,都适合在CTM的保护下。这表明,分类是偏离新古典选择模型的一种潜在机制,也是解释从新古典选择模型角度来看反常的各种证据的一种解释。我们将CTM专业化,为Bordalo et al.(2013)的突出思维模型提供行为基础,突出其强大的预测能力和与其他现有模型的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Choice with Endogenous Categorization
We propose a novel categorical thinking model (CTM) where the framing of the decision problem affects how the agent categorizes each product, and the product's category affects her evaluation of the product. We show that a number of prominent models of salience, status quo bias, loss-aversion, inequality aversion, and present bias all fit under the umbrella of CTM. This suggests categorization as an underlying mechanism for key departures from the neoclassical model of choice and an account for diverse sets of evidence that are anomalous from its perspective. We specialize CTM to provide a behavioral foundation for the salient thinking model of Bordalo et al. (2013), highlighting its strong predictions and distinctions from other existing models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信