俄罗斯紧急情况部活动中行政程序改进的实际问题和方向

V. Gavrilenko, V. Shenshin
{"title":"俄罗斯紧急情况部活动中行政程序改进的实际问题和方向","authors":"V. Gavrilenko, V. Shenshin","doi":"10.18287/2542-047x-2022-8-4-26-33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The presented study examines the current problems and directions of improving the administrative process in the activities of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia. The purpose of the study is to consider the problems and directions of improving the administrative process in the activities of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia. The analysis of law enforcement and judicial practice on disputes arising in connection with the application of a measure to ensure the proceedings in the case of an administrative offense committed in the form of a drive to the judicial authority of the accused person; the implementation of actions to draw up a protocol on an identified administrative offense in violation of the term, which is indicated by the provisions of Article 28.5 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation; the compilation by an official of the supervisory authority of the act of verification of a legal entity on the same day with the protocol on the commission of an administrative offense, revealed that currently there is a specific judicial practice in these categories of cases, allowing judicial authorities to apply a uniform approach to their resolution, despite the differentiation of views and legal understanding demonstrated by the parties of law relations. Some issues arising from these types of disputes have not yet been reflected in the legislation, which creates the need to prove in court the legality of actions carried out by officials of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia, which generally contributes to an increase in the number of court disputes, and also increases the burden on judicial authorities.","PeriodicalId":406056,"journal":{"name":"Juridical Journal of Samara University","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Actual problems and directions of improving the administrative process in the activities of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia\",\"authors\":\"V. Gavrilenko, V. Shenshin\",\"doi\":\"10.18287/2542-047x-2022-8-4-26-33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The presented study examines the current problems and directions of improving the administrative process in the activities of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia. The purpose of the study is to consider the problems and directions of improving the administrative process in the activities of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia. The analysis of law enforcement and judicial practice on disputes arising in connection with the application of a measure to ensure the proceedings in the case of an administrative offense committed in the form of a drive to the judicial authority of the accused person; the implementation of actions to draw up a protocol on an identified administrative offense in violation of the term, which is indicated by the provisions of Article 28.5 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation; the compilation by an official of the supervisory authority of the act of verification of a legal entity on the same day with the protocol on the commission of an administrative offense, revealed that currently there is a specific judicial practice in these categories of cases, allowing judicial authorities to apply a uniform approach to their resolution, despite the differentiation of views and legal understanding demonstrated by the parties of law relations. Some issues arising from these types of disputes have not yet been reflected in the legislation, which creates the need to prove in court the legality of actions carried out by officials of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia, which generally contributes to an increase in the number of court disputes, and also increases the burden on judicial authorities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":406056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Juridical Journal of Samara University\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Juridical Journal of Samara University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047x-2022-8-4-26-33\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical Journal of Samara University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047x-2022-8-4-26-33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究报告审查了俄罗斯紧急情况部活动中目前存在的问题和改进行政程序的方向。这项研究的目的是考虑改进俄罗斯紧急情况部活动中的行政程序的问题和方向。对执法和司法实践中因在行政犯罪案件中以驱动被告司法当局的形式确保诉讼程序的措施的适用而产生的争端的分析;就俄罗斯联邦《行政法典》第28.5条规定的违反该期限的已查明的行政罪行拟订议定书的行动的执行情况;监管机构的一名官员在与行政违法行为议定书同一天编纂了法人实体的核查行为,显示出目前在这些类别的案件中存在特定的司法实践,允许司法当局采用统一的方法来解决这些案件,尽管法律关系当事人表现出不同的观点和法律理解。这类争端所引起的一些问题尚未在立法中反映出来,这就需要在法庭上证明俄罗斯紧急情况部官员所采取行动的合法性,这通常导致法院争端的数量增加,也增加了司法当局的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Actual problems and directions of improving the administrative process in the activities of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia
The presented study examines the current problems and directions of improving the administrative process in the activities of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia. The purpose of the study is to consider the problems and directions of improving the administrative process in the activities of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia. The analysis of law enforcement and judicial practice on disputes arising in connection with the application of a measure to ensure the proceedings in the case of an administrative offense committed in the form of a drive to the judicial authority of the accused person; the implementation of actions to draw up a protocol on an identified administrative offense in violation of the term, which is indicated by the provisions of Article 28.5 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation; the compilation by an official of the supervisory authority of the act of verification of a legal entity on the same day with the protocol on the commission of an administrative offense, revealed that currently there is a specific judicial practice in these categories of cases, allowing judicial authorities to apply a uniform approach to their resolution, despite the differentiation of views and legal understanding demonstrated by the parties of law relations. Some issues arising from these types of disputes have not yet been reflected in the legislation, which creates the need to prove in court the legality of actions carried out by officials of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia, which generally contributes to an increase in the number of court disputes, and also increases the burden on judicial authorities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信