测试长系列审计信息及其代谢方法的审查和奖励效果与小组讨论

Yolanda Christina Rambing, Intiyas Utami, I. Kristianti
{"title":"测试长系列审计信息及其代谢方法的审查和奖励效果与小组讨论","authors":"Yolanda Christina Rambing, Intiyas Utami, I. Kristianti","doi":"10.14414/jebav.v22i2.1204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to test the order effect on the long series audit information and provide the form of mitigation by using group discussion so as to improve the quality of the decision. Order effects consist of reviews and primacy effects. A reviewer effect is a bias that occurs when an individual weighs the final received information larger for the overall information received. While the effect of primacy is a bias that occurs when individuals weigh greater initial information. Therefore, it is necessary to give a method so that the individual can consider the whole information for decision making which in this research use group discussion. This research uses 2x2x2 experimental design within subject with 81 participants from undergraduate accounting students.The results show that: (i) in the sequential ordering pattern for positive positive or negative positive sequence of positive information, the quality of individual decisions after group discussion is better than before the group discussion, (ii) the mitigation process does not occur in the simultaneous presentation pattern Positive positive or negative negative information sequence, (iii) sequential representation pattern more mitigated than simultaneous representation pattern.","PeriodicalId":101840,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economics, Business & Accountancy Ventura","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pengujian Efek Resensi Dan Primasi Pada Informasi Audit Seri Panjang Dan Metode Mitigasinya Dengan Diskusi Kelompok\",\"authors\":\"Yolanda Christina Rambing, Intiyas Utami, I. Kristianti\",\"doi\":\"10.14414/jebav.v22i2.1204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to test the order effect on the long series audit information and provide the form of mitigation by using group discussion so as to improve the quality of the decision. Order effects consist of reviews and primacy effects. A reviewer effect is a bias that occurs when an individual weighs the final received information larger for the overall information received. While the effect of primacy is a bias that occurs when individuals weigh greater initial information. Therefore, it is necessary to give a method so that the individual can consider the whole information for decision making which in this research use group discussion. This research uses 2x2x2 experimental design within subject with 81 participants from undergraduate accounting students.The results show that: (i) in the sequential ordering pattern for positive positive or negative positive sequence of positive information, the quality of individual decisions after group discussion is better than before the group discussion, (ii) the mitigation process does not occur in the simultaneous presentation pattern Positive positive or negative negative information sequence, (iii) sequential representation pattern more mitigated than simultaneous representation pattern.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economics, Business & Accountancy Ventura\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economics, Business & Accountancy Ventura\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v22i2.1204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economics, Business & Accountancy Ventura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v22i2.1204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在检验长序列审计信息的顺序效应,并通过小组讨论提供缓解形式,以提高决策质量。顺序效应包括回顾效应和首因效应。审稿人效应是一种偏见,当一个人认为最终收到的信息比收到的总体信息更重要时,就会出现这种偏见。而首因效应是一种偏见,当个体权衡更大的初始信息时发生。因此,有必要给出一种方法,使个人可以考虑整个信息的决策,在本研究中使用小组讨论。本研究采用2x2x2实验设计,共有81名会计专业本科生参与。结果表明:(1)在正向信息的正向或负向正向序列的顺序排序模式下,小组讨论后的个体决策质量优于小组讨论前的个体决策质量;(2)在正向或负向负向信息序列的同时呈现模式下,个体决策不存在缓解过程;(3)顺序表征模式比同时表征模式更能缓解个体决策质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pengujian Efek Resensi Dan Primasi Pada Informasi Audit Seri Panjang Dan Metode Mitigasinya Dengan Diskusi Kelompok
This study aims to test the order effect on the long series audit information and provide the form of mitigation by using group discussion so as to improve the quality of the decision. Order effects consist of reviews and primacy effects. A reviewer effect is a bias that occurs when an individual weighs the final received information larger for the overall information received. While the effect of primacy is a bias that occurs when individuals weigh greater initial information. Therefore, it is necessary to give a method so that the individual can consider the whole information for decision making which in this research use group discussion. This research uses 2x2x2 experimental design within subject with 81 participants from undergraduate accounting students.The results show that: (i) in the sequential ordering pattern for positive positive or negative positive sequence of positive information, the quality of individual decisions after group discussion is better than before the group discussion, (ii) the mitigation process does not occur in the simultaneous presentation pattern Positive positive or negative negative information sequence, (iii) sequential representation pattern more mitigated than simultaneous representation pattern.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信