分析认为学生在范·希尔的水平上解决了segias - 4问题

Leady Dione alfa Giovanni, S. Susanto, Erfan Yudianto
{"title":"分析认为学生在范·希尔的水平上解决了segias - 4问题","authors":"Leady Dione alfa Giovanni, S. Susanto, Erfan Yudianto","doi":"10.19184/jomeal.v2i1.24829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reason behind this research is the low mathematical ability of the students in geometry. They think that geometry is difficult to comprehend, so that we need a lesson from the teacher in order to make students interested in studying geometry. In order to create interesting learning, teachers need to see students' thinking. Therefore, this research aims to determine students’ thinking ability in solving quadrilateral using Polya’s problem solving steps associated with level descriptors of Van Hiele. This research employed qualitative descriptive study. The subjects of this research were 2 students from each level of visualization, analysis, informal deduction, and 1 student from level of rigor. The initial step of this research was determining the research subject by administering a test, then proceeded by giving a geometry practice test and interviews. The results showed that the students at the visualization and informal deduction both met the indicators of planning, solving, and explaining problems coherently, students at the level of informal deduction also fulfilled the indicators involving previously acquired knowledge to solve problems, the students at the analys level could not fulfill the indicators of analys level, and the students at the rigor level fulfilled one indicator which was using logic in the step of implementing plan.","PeriodicalId":308973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematics Education and Learning","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analisis Berpikir Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Segiempat Berdasarkan Level van Hiele\",\"authors\":\"Leady Dione alfa Giovanni, S. Susanto, Erfan Yudianto\",\"doi\":\"10.19184/jomeal.v2i1.24829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The reason behind this research is the low mathematical ability of the students in geometry. They think that geometry is difficult to comprehend, so that we need a lesson from the teacher in order to make students interested in studying geometry. In order to create interesting learning, teachers need to see students' thinking. Therefore, this research aims to determine students’ thinking ability in solving quadrilateral using Polya’s problem solving steps associated with level descriptors of Van Hiele. This research employed qualitative descriptive study. The subjects of this research were 2 students from each level of visualization, analysis, informal deduction, and 1 student from level of rigor. The initial step of this research was determining the research subject by administering a test, then proceeded by giving a geometry practice test and interviews. The results showed that the students at the visualization and informal deduction both met the indicators of planning, solving, and explaining problems coherently, students at the level of informal deduction also fulfilled the indicators involving previously acquired knowledge to solve problems, the students at the analys level could not fulfill the indicators of analys level, and the students at the rigor level fulfilled one indicator which was using logic in the step of implementing plan.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mathematics Education and Learning\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mathematics Education and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19184/jomeal.v2i1.24829\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematics Education and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19184/jomeal.v2i1.24829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这项研究背后的原因是几何学生的数学能力较低。他们认为几何很难理解,所以我们需要老师的一节课,以使学生对学习几何感兴趣。为了创造有趣的学习,教师需要看到学生的思维。因此,本研究旨在利用Polya与Van Hiele水平描述符相关的问题解决步骤来确定学生解决四边形的思维能力。本研究采用定性描述性研究。本研究的研究对象为可视化、分析、非正式演绎水平各2名学生和严谨水平各1名学生。本研究的第一步是通过测试确定研究对象,然后进行几何练习测试和访谈。结果表明:可视化和非正式演绎水平的学生均达到了连贯地计划、解决和解释问题的指标,非正式演绎水平的学生也达到了涉及先前获得的知识解决问题的指标,分析水平的学生不能达到分析水平的指标,严谨水平的学生达到了在执行计划的步骤中使用逻辑的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analisis Berpikir Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Segiempat Berdasarkan Level van Hiele
The reason behind this research is the low mathematical ability of the students in geometry. They think that geometry is difficult to comprehend, so that we need a lesson from the teacher in order to make students interested in studying geometry. In order to create interesting learning, teachers need to see students' thinking. Therefore, this research aims to determine students’ thinking ability in solving quadrilateral using Polya’s problem solving steps associated with level descriptors of Van Hiele. This research employed qualitative descriptive study. The subjects of this research were 2 students from each level of visualization, analysis, informal deduction, and 1 student from level of rigor. The initial step of this research was determining the research subject by administering a test, then proceeded by giving a geometry practice test and interviews. The results showed that the students at the visualization and informal deduction both met the indicators of planning, solving, and explaining problems coherently, students at the level of informal deduction also fulfilled the indicators involving previously acquired knowledge to solve problems, the students at the analys level could not fulfill the indicators of analys level, and the students at the rigor level fulfilled one indicator which was using logic in the step of implementing plan.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信