{"title":"丙烷预冷混合制冷剂与C1 -C3复叠制冷剂制冷天然气的对比分析","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/pcii.06.02.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The liquefied natural gas remains the most viable means of global distribution of natural gas. Unfortunately, the liquefying process consumes high amount of energy impacting negatively on the economic viability of the LNG business. Based on this, the current work assesses the selection of propane pre-cooled mixed refrigerant [C3 MR] and methane, ethane and propane [C1 -C3 ] refrigerant cascade system as a refrigerant with essential benefits in LNG production. The process was simulated using Aspen HYSYS, and its economic tool was used to carry out the techno economic analysis and estimate the duties of the two processes. The results obtained showed that the production cost were $20,345,490 and $114,796,200 for C1 -C3 cascade refrigeration system and C3 MR, respectively. The duty were 568.721 MW and 626.462 MW for the C1 -C3 cascade refrigeration system and C3MR, respectively. This shows that C1 -C3 cascade refrigeration system performed better than the C3 MR. Therefore, the former refrigerant is preferred in a liquefying process than the latter as it is cheaper, consumes less amount of energy and is more environmentally friendly.","PeriodicalId":355186,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum and Chemical Industry International","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of the Refrigeration of Natural Gas Using Propane PreCooled Mixed Refrigerant and C1 -C3 Cascade Refrigerant\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.33140/pcii.06.02.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The liquefied natural gas remains the most viable means of global distribution of natural gas. Unfortunately, the liquefying process consumes high amount of energy impacting negatively on the economic viability of the LNG business. Based on this, the current work assesses the selection of propane pre-cooled mixed refrigerant [C3 MR] and methane, ethane and propane [C1 -C3 ] refrigerant cascade system as a refrigerant with essential benefits in LNG production. The process was simulated using Aspen HYSYS, and its economic tool was used to carry out the techno economic analysis and estimate the duties of the two processes. The results obtained showed that the production cost were $20,345,490 and $114,796,200 for C1 -C3 cascade refrigeration system and C3 MR, respectively. The duty were 568.721 MW and 626.462 MW for the C1 -C3 cascade refrigeration system and C3MR, respectively. This shows that C1 -C3 cascade refrigeration system performed better than the C3 MR. Therefore, the former refrigerant is preferred in a liquefying process than the latter as it is cheaper, consumes less amount of energy and is more environmentally friendly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Petroleum and Chemical Industry International\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Petroleum and Chemical Industry International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33140/pcii.06.02.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum and Chemical Industry International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/pcii.06.02.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Analysis of the Refrigeration of Natural Gas Using Propane PreCooled Mixed Refrigerant and C1 -C3 Cascade Refrigerant
The liquefied natural gas remains the most viable means of global distribution of natural gas. Unfortunately, the liquefying process consumes high amount of energy impacting negatively on the economic viability of the LNG business. Based on this, the current work assesses the selection of propane pre-cooled mixed refrigerant [C3 MR] and methane, ethane and propane [C1 -C3 ] refrigerant cascade system as a refrigerant with essential benefits in LNG production. The process was simulated using Aspen HYSYS, and its economic tool was used to carry out the techno economic analysis and estimate the duties of the two processes. The results obtained showed that the production cost were $20,345,490 and $114,796,200 for C1 -C3 cascade refrigeration system and C3 MR, respectively. The duty were 568.721 MW and 626.462 MW for the C1 -C3 cascade refrigeration system and C3MR, respectively. This shows that C1 -C3 cascade refrigeration system performed better than the C3 MR. Therefore, the former refrigerant is preferred in a liquefying process than the latter as it is cheaper, consumes less amount of energy and is more environmentally friendly.