丙烷预冷混合制冷剂与C1 -C3复叠制冷剂制冷天然气的对比分析

{"title":"丙烷预冷混合制冷剂与C1 -C3复叠制冷剂制冷天然气的对比分析","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/pcii.06.02.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The liquefied natural gas remains the most viable means of global distribution of natural gas. Unfortunately, the liquefying process consumes high amount of energy impacting negatively on the economic viability of the LNG business. Based on this, the current work assesses the selection of propane pre-cooled mixed refrigerant [C3 MR] and methane, ethane and propane [C1 -C3 ] refrigerant cascade system as a refrigerant with essential benefits in LNG production. The process was simulated using Aspen HYSYS, and its economic tool was used to carry out the techno economic analysis and estimate the duties of the two processes. The results obtained showed that the production cost were $20,345,490 and $114,796,200 for C1 -C3 cascade refrigeration system and C3 MR, respectively. The duty were 568.721 MW and 626.462 MW for the C1 -C3 cascade refrigeration system and C3MR, respectively. This shows that C1 -C3 cascade refrigeration system performed better than the C3 MR. Therefore, the former refrigerant is preferred in a liquefying process than the latter as it is cheaper, consumes less amount of energy and is more environmentally friendly.","PeriodicalId":355186,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum and Chemical Industry International","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of the Refrigeration of Natural Gas Using Propane PreCooled Mixed Refrigerant and C1 -C3 Cascade Refrigerant\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.33140/pcii.06.02.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The liquefied natural gas remains the most viable means of global distribution of natural gas. Unfortunately, the liquefying process consumes high amount of energy impacting negatively on the economic viability of the LNG business. Based on this, the current work assesses the selection of propane pre-cooled mixed refrigerant [C3 MR] and methane, ethane and propane [C1 -C3 ] refrigerant cascade system as a refrigerant with essential benefits in LNG production. The process was simulated using Aspen HYSYS, and its economic tool was used to carry out the techno economic analysis and estimate the duties of the two processes. The results obtained showed that the production cost were $20,345,490 and $114,796,200 for C1 -C3 cascade refrigeration system and C3 MR, respectively. The duty were 568.721 MW and 626.462 MW for the C1 -C3 cascade refrigeration system and C3MR, respectively. This shows that C1 -C3 cascade refrigeration system performed better than the C3 MR. Therefore, the former refrigerant is preferred in a liquefying process than the latter as it is cheaper, consumes less amount of energy and is more environmentally friendly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Petroleum and Chemical Industry International\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Petroleum and Chemical Industry International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33140/pcii.06.02.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum and Chemical Industry International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/pcii.06.02.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

液化天然气仍然是全球天然气分配最可行的方式。不幸的是,液化过程消耗大量能源,对液化天然气业务的经济可行性产生负面影响。基于此,本工作评估了丙烷预冷混合制冷剂[C3 MR]和甲烷、乙烷和丙烷[C1 -C3]制冷剂梯级系统作为液化天然气生产中具有重要效益的制冷剂的选择。采用Aspen HYSYS软件对该工艺进行了模拟,并利用其经济工具对两种工艺进行了技术经济分析,并对两种工艺的作用进行了估算。结果表明,C1 -C3级联制冷系统和C3 MR的生产成本分别为20345490美元和114796200美元。C1 -C3级联制冷系统和C3MR的功率分别为568.721 MW和626.462 MW。由此可见,C1 -C3级联制冷系统的制冷性能优于C3 mr。因此,在液化过程中,C1 -C3制冷剂比C3 mr更便宜、能耗更少、更环保。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of the Refrigeration of Natural Gas Using Propane PreCooled Mixed Refrigerant and C1 -C3 Cascade Refrigerant
The liquefied natural gas remains the most viable means of global distribution of natural gas. Unfortunately, the liquefying process consumes high amount of energy impacting negatively on the economic viability of the LNG business. Based on this, the current work assesses the selection of propane pre-cooled mixed refrigerant [C3 MR] and methane, ethane and propane [C1 -C3 ] refrigerant cascade system as a refrigerant with essential benefits in LNG production. The process was simulated using Aspen HYSYS, and its economic tool was used to carry out the techno economic analysis and estimate the duties of the two processes. The results obtained showed that the production cost were $20,345,490 and $114,796,200 for C1 -C3 cascade refrigeration system and C3 MR, respectively. The duty were 568.721 MW and 626.462 MW for the C1 -C3 cascade refrigeration system and C3MR, respectively. This shows that C1 -C3 cascade refrigeration system performed better than the C3 MR. Therefore, the former refrigerant is preferred in a liquefying process than the latter as it is cheaper, consumes less amount of energy and is more environmentally friendly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信