行人检测的内省分类

C. Blair, J. Thompson, N. Robertson
{"title":"行人检测的内省分类","authors":"C. Blair, J. Thompson, N. Robertson","doi":"10.1109/SSPD.2014.6943310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"State-of-the-art pedestrian detectors are capable of finding humans in images with reasonable accuracy. However, accurate object detectors such as Integral Channel Features (ICF) do not provide good reliability; they are unable to identify detections which they are less confident (or more uncertain) about. We apply existing methods for generating probabilistic measures from classifier scores (such as Piatt exponential scaling and Isotonic Regression) and compare these to Gaussian Process classifiers (GPCs), which can provide more informative predictive variance. GPCs are less accurate than ICF classifiers, but GPCs and Adaboost with Piatt scaling both provide improved reliability over existing methods.","PeriodicalId":133530,"journal":{"name":"2014 Sensor Signal Processing for Defence (SSPD)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introspective classification for pedestrian detection\",\"authors\":\"C. Blair, J. Thompson, N. Robertson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SSPD.2014.6943310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"State-of-the-art pedestrian detectors are capable of finding humans in images with reasonable accuracy. However, accurate object detectors such as Integral Channel Features (ICF) do not provide good reliability; they are unable to identify detections which they are less confident (or more uncertain) about. We apply existing methods for generating probabilistic measures from classifier scores (such as Piatt exponential scaling and Isotonic Regression) and compare these to Gaussian Process classifiers (GPCs), which can provide more informative predictive variance. GPCs are less accurate than ICF classifiers, but GPCs and Adaboost with Piatt scaling both provide improved reliability over existing methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":133530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 Sensor Signal Processing for Defence (SSPD)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 Sensor Signal Processing for Defence (SSPD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SSPD.2014.6943310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 Sensor Signal Processing for Defence (SSPD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SSPD.2014.6943310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

最先进的行人探测器能够以合理的精度在图像中找到人。然而,精确的目标检测器,如积分通道特征(ICF)不能提供良好的可靠性;他们无法识别他们不太自信(或更不确定)的检测。我们应用现有的方法从分类器得分中生成概率度量(如Piatt指数缩放和等压回归),并将这些方法与高斯过程分类器(GPCs)进行比较,后者可以提供更多信息的预测方差。gpc不如ICF分类器准确,但是gpc和带有Piatt缩放的Adaboost都比现有方法提供了更高的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introspective classification for pedestrian detection
State-of-the-art pedestrian detectors are capable of finding humans in images with reasonable accuracy. However, accurate object detectors such as Integral Channel Features (ICF) do not provide good reliability; they are unable to identify detections which they are less confident (or more uncertain) about. We apply existing methods for generating probabilistic measures from classifier scores (such as Piatt exponential scaling and Isotonic Regression) and compare these to Gaussian Process classifiers (GPCs), which can provide more informative predictive variance. GPCs are less accurate than ICF classifiers, but GPCs and Adaboost with Piatt scaling both provide improved reliability over existing methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信