设计科学研究为强迫症的循证实践提供工具性知识

Joan Ernst van Aken
{"title":"设计科学研究为强迫症的循证实践提供工具性知识","authors":"Joan Ernst van Aken","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-7297-9.ch013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a promising approach to improve professional action. EBP is the use of the best available knowledge in professional problem-solving, in particular the best available knowledge produced by research. EBP has much promise for organizational change and development (OCD). However, for successful EBP, one needs a well-developed knowledge base of instrumental knowledge (i.e., knowledge-to-act). Unfortunately, academic OCD research is strong in developing conceptual knowledge (i.e., knowledge-to-understand) but rather weak in instrumental knowledge. In this chapter, design science research (DSR) is discussed: a research strategy to develop instrumental knowledge in the form of designs for effective interventions, processes, or systems to improve present practices. These designs are developed through experiential learning by executing a number of problem-solving projects in the messy “swamp of practice,” often executed in partnerships with professionals. Embedded-in-action theories can be powerful inputs for EBP, thus improving the practice of OCD.","PeriodicalId":325408,"journal":{"name":"Research Anthology on Digital Transformation, Organizational Change, and the Impact of Remote Work","volume":"301 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design Science Research to Produce Instrumental Knowledge for Evidence-Based Practice in OCD\",\"authors\":\"Joan Ernst van Aken\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/978-1-7998-7297-9.ch013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a promising approach to improve professional action. EBP is the use of the best available knowledge in professional problem-solving, in particular the best available knowledge produced by research. EBP has much promise for organizational change and development (OCD). However, for successful EBP, one needs a well-developed knowledge base of instrumental knowledge (i.e., knowledge-to-act). Unfortunately, academic OCD research is strong in developing conceptual knowledge (i.e., knowledge-to-understand) but rather weak in instrumental knowledge. In this chapter, design science research (DSR) is discussed: a research strategy to develop instrumental knowledge in the form of designs for effective interventions, processes, or systems to improve present practices. These designs are developed through experiential learning by executing a number of problem-solving projects in the messy “swamp of practice,” often executed in partnerships with professionals. Embedded-in-action theories can be powerful inputs for EBP, thus improving the practice of OCD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Anthology on Digital Transformation, Organizational Change, and the Impact of Remote Work\",\"volume\":\"301 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Anthology on Digital Transformation, Organizational Change, and the Impact of Remote Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7297-9.ch013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Anthology on Digital Transformation, Organizational Change, and the Impact of Remote Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7297-9.ch013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

循证实践(EBP)是一种很有前途的改善专业行为的方法。EBP是在专业问题解决中使用最佳可用知识,特别是通过研究产生的最佳可用知识。EBP对组织变革和发展(OCD)有很大的希望。然而,对于成功的EBP,一个人需要一个完善的工具性知识知识库(即,从知识到行动)。不幸的是,学术强迫症研究在发展概念性知识(即理解知识)方面很强,但在工具性知识方面很弱。本章讨论了设计科学研究(DSR):一种研究策略,以有效干预、流程或系统的设计形式发展工具性知识,以改进当前的实践。这些设计是通过在混乱的“实践沼泽”中执行许多解决问题的项目而通过经验学习开发的,这些项目通常是与专业人员合作执行的。行动嵌入理论可以为EBP提供强有力的输入,从而改善强迫症的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design Science Research to Produce Instrumental Knowledge for Evidence-Based Practice in OCD
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a promising approach to improve professional action. EBP is the use of the best available knowledge in professional problem-solving, in particular the best available knowledge produced by research. EBP has much promise for organizational change and development (OCD). However, for successful EBP, one needs a well-developed knowledge base of instrumental knowledge (i.e., knowledge-to-act). Unfortunately, academic OCD research is strong in developing conceptual knowledge (i.e., knowledge-to-understand) but rather weak in instrumental knowledge. In this chapter, design science research (DSR) is discussed: a research strategy to develop instrumental knowledge in the form of designs for effective interventions, processes, or systems to improve present practices. These designs are developed through experiential learning by executing a number of problem-solving projects in the messy “swamp of practice,” often executed in partnerships with professionals. Embedded-in-action theories can be powerful inputs for EBP, thus improving the practice of OCD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信