{"title":"伊维菌素和唑诺酮:文献中的双重标准","authors":"C. Ross","doi":"10.31038/jnnc.2022511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"J Neurol Neurocrit Care, Volume 5(1): 1–2, 2022 Three recent publications illustrate the ongoing double standard concerning the effectiveness of ivermectin for treatment of early outpatient cases of COVID-19 infection. It seems to be true that ivermectin has no beneficial effect for seriously ill hospitalized patients – its potential utility is for reducing the frequency of transition from early mild outpatient cases to severely ill hospitalized cases. Lack of effectiveness inside hospitals does not prove a lack of effectiveness in outpatient populations.","PeriodicalId":237353,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology and Neurocritical Care","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ivermectin and Zuranolone: A Double Standard in the Literature\",\"authors\":\"C. Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.31038/jnnc.2022511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"J Neurol Neurocrit Care, Volume 5(1): 1–2, 2022 Three recent publications illustrate the ongoing double standard concerning the effectiveness of ivermectin for treatment of early outpatient cases of COVID-19 infection. It seems to be true that ivermectin has no beneficial effect for seriously ill hospitalized patients – its potential utility is for reducing the frequency of transition from early mild outpatient cases to severely ill hospitalized cases. Lack of effectiveness inside hospitals does not prove a lack of effectiveness in outpatient populations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":237353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology and Neurocritical Care\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology and Neurocritical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31038/jnnc.2022511\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology and Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31038/jnnc.2022511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ivermectin and Zuranolone: A Double Standard in the Literature
J Neurol Neurocrit Care, Volume 5(1): 1–2, 2022 Three recent publications illustrate the ongoing double standard concerning the effectiveness of ivermectin for treatment of early outpatient cases of COVID-19 infection. It seems to be true that ivermectin has no beneficial effect for seriously ill hospitalized patients – its potential utility is for reducing the frequency of transition from early mild outpatient cases to severely ill hospitalized cases. Lack of effectiveness inside hospitals does not prove a lack of effectiveness in outpatient populations.