伊维菌素和唑诺酮:文献中的双重标准

C. Ross
{"title":"伊维菌素和唑诺酮:文献中的双重标准","authors":"C. Ross","doi":"10.31038/jnnc.2022511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"J Neurol Neurocrit Care, Volume 5(1): 1–2, 2022 Three recent publications illustrate the ongoing double standard concerning the effectiveness of ivermectin for treatment of early outpatient cases of COVID-19 infection. It seems to be true that ivermectin has no beneficial effect for seriously ill hospitalized patients – its potential utility is for reducing the frequency of transition from early mild outpatient cases to severely ill hospitalized cases. Lack of effectiveness inside hospitals does not prove a lack of effectiveness in outpatient populations.","PeriodicalId":237353,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology and Neurocritical Care","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ivermectin and Zuranolone: A Double Standard in the Literature\",\"authors\":\"C. Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.31038/jnnc.2022511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"J Neurol Neurocrit Care, Volume 5(1): 1–2, 2022 Three recent publications illustrate the ongoing double standard concerning the effectiveness of ivermectin for treatment of early outpatient cases of COVID-19 infection. It seems to be true that ivermectin has no beneficial effect for seriously ill hospitalized patients – its potential utility is for reducing the frequency of transition from early mild outpatient cases to severely ill hospitalized cases. Lack of effectiveness inside hospitals does not prove a lack of effectiveness in outpatient populations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":237353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology and Neurocritical Care\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology and Neurocritical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31038/jnnc.2022511\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology and Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31038/jnnc.2022511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近发表的三篇文章说明了关于伊维菌素治疗早期门诊COVID-19感染的有效性的双重标准。伊维菌素对住院重症患者似乎没有任何有益作用,这似乎是事实——它的潜在效用在于减少从早期轻度门诊病例过渡到重症住院病例的频率。医院内部缺乏有效性并不证明门诊人群缺乏有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ivermectin and Zuranolone: A Double Standard in the Literature
J Neurol Neurocrit Care, Volume 5(1): 1–2, 2022 Three recent publications illustrate the ongoing double standard concerning the effectiveness of ivermectin for treatment of early outpatient cases of COVID-19 infection. It seems to be true that ivermectin has no beneficial effect for seriously ill hospitalized patients – its potential utility is for reducing the frequency of transition from early mild outpatient cases to severely ill hospitalized cases. Lack of effectiveness inside hospitals does not prove a lack of effectiveness in outpatient populations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信