不同主干语义分割网络的准确率性能

Haneen Alokasi, M. B. Ahmad
{"title":"不同主干语义分割网络的准确率性能","authors":"Haneen Alokasi, M. B. Ahmad","doi":"10.1109/CDMA54072.2022.00013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the fast improvement of classification networks, many of these networks are being in use as backbones of semantic segmentation networks to improve the accuracy. Using different classification networks as the backbone of the same semantic segmentation network may show different accuracy performance. This paper selected the sandstone dataset and self-driving cars dataset to compare the accuracy performance differences of VGG-16, ResNet-34, and Inceptionv3 as the backbone of UNet, where the original encoder of the UNet is replaced by a backbone. The three backbone networks are imported from Segmentation Models library, and they have weights trained on ImageNet dataset. The best accuracy performance of the semantic segmentation network on the sandstone dataset is when VGG-16 is used as the backbone, it achieved 76.22% MIoU. On the other hand, the highest accuracy performance of the semantic segmentation network on self-driving cars dataset is 75.47% MIoU, achieved when Inceptionv3 is used as the backbone. However, the accuracy is improved when using all the three backbones with both datasets, compared to the accuracy performance of the UNet without using any backbone network.","PeriodicalId":313042,"journal":{"name":"2022 7th International Conference on Data Science and Machine Learning Applications (CDMA)","volume":"2013 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Accuracy Performance of Semantic Segmentation Network with Different Backbones\",\"authors\":\"Haneen Alokasi, M. B. Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CDMA54072.2022.00013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the fast improvement of classification networks, many of these networks are being in use as backbones of semantic segmentation networks to improve the accuracy. Using different classification networks as the backbone of the same semantic segmentation network may show different accuracy performance. This paper selected the sandstone dataset and self-driving cars dataset to compare the accuracy performance differences of VGG-16, ResNet-34, and Inceptionv3 as the backbone of UNet, where the original encoder of the UNet is replaced by a backbone. The three backbone networks are imported from Segmentation Models library, and they have weights trained on ImageNet dataset. The best accuracy performance of the semantic segmentation network on the sandstone dataset is when VGG-16 is used as the backbone, it achieved 76.22% MIoU. On the other hand, the highest accuracy performance of the semantic segmentation network on self-driving cars dataset is 75.47% MIoU, achieved when Inceptionv3 is used as the backbone. However, the accuracy is improved when using all the three backbones with both datasets, compared to the accuracy performance of the UNet without using any backbone network.\",\"PeriodicalId\":313042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 7th International Conference on Data Science and Machine Learning Applications (CDMA)\",\"volume\":\"2013 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 7th International Conference on Data Science and Machine Learning Applications (CDMA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CDMA54072.2022.00013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 7th International Conference on Data Science and Machine Learning Applications (CDMA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CDMA54072.2022.00013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着分类网络的快速发展,许多分类网络被用作语义分割网络的主干,以提高准确率。使用不同的分类网络作为同一语义分割网络的主干,其准确率表现可能不同。本文选择砂岩数据集和自动驾驶汽车数据集,比较VGG-16、ResNet-34和Inceptionv3作为UNet骨干网的精度性能差异,其中UNet的原始编码器被骨干网取代。从分割模型库中导入三个骨干网络,在ImageNet数据集上进行权值训练。在砂岩数据集上,以VGG-16为主干的语义分割网络准确率最高,达到76.22% MIoU。另一方面,当使用Inceptionv3作为主干时,自动驾驶汽车数据集上的语义分割网络的最高准确率性能为75.47% MIoU。然而,与不使用任何骨干网的UNet相比,在两个数据集上使用所有三个骨干网的精度性能得到了提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Accuracy Performance of Semantic Segmentation Network with Different Backbones
With the fast improvement of classification networks, many of these networks are being in use as backbones of semantic segmentation networks to improve the accuracy. Using different classification networks as the backbone of the same semantic segmentation network may show different accuracy performance. This paper selected the sandstone dataset and self-driving cars dataset to compare the accuracy performance differences of VGG-16, ResNet-34, and Inceptionv3 as the backbone of UNet, where the original encoder of the UNet is replaced by a backbone. The three backbone networks are imported from Segmentation Models library, and they have weights trained on ImageNet dataset. The best accuracy performance of the semantic segmentation network on the sandstone dataset is when VGG-16 is used as the backbone, it achieved 76.22% MIoU. On the other hand, the highest accuracy performance of the semantic segmentation network on self-driving cars dataset is 75.47% MIoU, achieved when Inceptionv3 is used as the backbone. However, the accuracy is improved when using all the three backbones with both datasets, compared to the accuracy performance of the UNet without using any backbone network.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信