啁啾z变换的计算代价与广义Goertzel算法

P. Rajmic, Zdeněk Průša, Christoph Wiesmeyr
{"title":"啁啾z变换的计算代价与广义Goertzel算法","authors":"P. Rajmic, Zdeněk Průša, Christoph Wiesmeyr","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.44055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two natural competitors in the area of narrow-band spectrum analysis, namely the Chirp Z-transform (CZT) and the Generalized Goertzel algorithm (GGA), are taken and compared, with the focus on the computational cost. We present results showing that for real-input data, the GGA is preferable over the CZT in a range of practical situations. This is shown both in theory and in practice.","PeriodicalId":198408,"journal":{"name":"2014 22nd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computational cost of Chirp Z-transform and Generalized Goertzel algorithm\",\"authors\":\"P. Rajmic, Zdeněk Průša, Christoph Wiesmeyr\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/ZENODO.44055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two natural competitors in the area of narrow-band spectrum analysis, namely the Chirp Z-transform (CZT) and the Generalized Goertzel algorithm (GGA), are taken and compared, with the focus on the computational cost. We present results showing that for real-input data, the GGA is preferable over the CZT in a range of practical situations. This is shown both in theory and in practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 22nd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 22nd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.44055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 22nd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.44055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

对窄带频谱分析领域的两个天然竞争对手,即Chirp z变换(CZT)和广义Goertzel算法(GGA)进行了比较,并重点讨论了计算成本。我们给出的结果表明,对于实际输入数据,GGA在一系列实际情况下优于CZT。理论和实践都证明了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Computational cost of Chirp Z-transform and Generalized Goertzel algorithm
Two natural competitors in the area of narrow-band spectrum analysis, namely the Chirp Z-transform (CZT) and the Generalized Goertzel algorithm (GGA), are taken and compared, with the focus on the computational cost. We present results showing that for real-input data, the GGA is preferable over the CZT in a range of practical situations. This is shown both in theory and in practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信