贫困与英国教育:危机中的学校制度

Ian Thompson
{"title":"贫困与英国教育:危机中的学校制度","authors":"Ian Thompson","doi":"10.46692/9781447330899.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter presents England as the educational outlier in the UK despite the fact that the vast majority of the UK’s pupil population is taught in its schools. England is the only jurisdiction in which the government controls education and the agents of the welfare state, and arguably the one in which a strong neo-liberal commitment to the market dominates. The pronounced neo-liberal stance taken by the Conservative Government blames the so-called ‘underserving poor’, increasingly presented as the ‘non-productive’ groups, for causing the need for welfare provision. \nMajor education policy initiatives in England are often incoherent and distorted by a neoliberal mind-set around performativity, human capital, and social ‘mobility’. At the same time government policy in England often assumes deficit models which blame both those living in poverty and the teachers who teach them rather than providing adequate resources. This chapter draws on research to argue that addressing the inequality gap in England will require a major policy shift despite the fact that it is already a high-profile policy issue.","PeriodicalId":197386,"journal":{"name":"Poverty in Education across the UK","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poverty and Education in England: a School System in Crisis\",\"authors\":\"Ian Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.46692/9781447330899.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter presents England as the educational outlier in the UK despite the fact that the vast majority of the UK’s pupil population is taught in its schools. England is the only jurisdiction in which the government controls education and the agents of the welfare state, and arguably the one in which a strong neo-liberal commitment to the market dominates. The pronounced neo-liberal stance taken by the Conservative Government blames the so-called ‘underserving poor’, increasingly presented as the ‘non-productive’ groups, for causing the need for welfare provision. \\nMajor education policy initiatives in England are often incoherent and distorted by a neoliberal mind-set around performativity, human capital, and social ‘mobility’. At the same time government policy in England often assumes deficit models which blame both those living in poverty and the teachers who teach them rather than providing adequate resources. This chapter draws on research to argue that addressing the inequality gap in England will require a major policy shift despite the fact that it is already a high-profile policy issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Poverty in Education across the UK\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Poverty in Education across the UK\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447330899.007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poverty in Education across the UK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447330899.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本章将英格兰描述为英国教育的异常值,尽管英国绝大多数学生都在学校接受教育。英国是唯一一个政府控制教育和福利国家代理人的司法管辖区,而且可以说是一个对市场的强烈新自由主义承诺占主导地位的司法管辖区。保守党政府采取了明显的新自由主义立场,指责所谓的“服务不足的穷人”,越来越多地被视为“非生产性”群体,导致了对福利提供的需求。英国的主要教育政策举措往往是不连贯的,并被新自由主义围绕绩效、人力资本和社会“流动性”的思维方式所扭曲。与此同时,英国政府的政策往往采用赤字模型,将责任归咎于贫困人口和教育他们的教师,而不是提供足够的资源。本章借鉴研究,认为解决英国的不平等差距将需要一个重大的政策转变,尽管事实上它已经是一个备受瞩目的政策问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Poverty and Education in England: a School System in Crisis
This chapter presents England as the educational outlier in the UK despite the fact that the vast majority of the UK’s pupil population is taught in its schools. England is the only jurisdiction in which the government controls education and the agents of the welfare state, and arguably the one in which a strong neo-liberal commitment to the market dominates. The pronounced neo-liberal stance taken by the Conservative Government blames the so-called ‘underserving poor’, increasingly presented as the ‘non-productive’ groups, for causing the need for welfare provision. Major education policy initiatives in England are often incoherent and distorted by a neoliberal mind-set around performativity, human capital, and social ‘mobility’. At the same time government policy in England often assumes deficit models which blame both those living in poverty and the teachers who teach them rather than providing adequate resources. This chapter draws on research to argue that addressing the inequality gap in England will require a major policy shift despite the fact that it is already a high-profile policy issue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信