基于纹理特征的离线签名验证方法在大型索引-脚本签名数据集上的性能

S. Pal, Alireza Alaei, U. Pal, M. Blumenstein
{"title":"基于纹理特征的离线签名验证方法在大型索引-脚本签名数据集上的性能","authors":"S. Pal, Alireza Alaei, U. Pal, M. Blumenstein","doi":"10.1109/DAS.2016.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a signature verification method based on texture features involving off-line signatures written in two different Indian scripts is proposed. Both Local Binary Patterns (LBP) and Uniform Local Binary Patterns (ULBP), as powerful texture feature extraction techniques, are used for characterizing off-line signatures. The Nearest Neighbour (NN) technique is considered as the similarity metric for signature verification in the proposed method. To evaluate the proposed verification approach, a large Bangla and Hindi off-line signature dataset (BHSig260) comprising 6240 (260×24) genuine signatures and 7800 (260×30) skilled forgeries was introduced and further used for experimentation. We further used the GPDS-100 signature dataset for a comparison. The experiments were conducted, and the verification accuracies were separately computed for the LBP and ULBP texture features. There were no remarkable changes in the results obtained applying the LBP and ULBP features for verification when the BHSig260 and GPDS-100 signature datasets were used for experimentation.","PeriodicalId":197359,"journal":{"name":"2016 12th IAPR Workshop on Document Analysis Systems (DAS)","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"67","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of an Off-Line Signature Verification Method Based on Texture Features on a Large Indic-Script Signature Dataset\",\"authors\":\"S. Pal, Alireza Alaei, U. Pal, M. Blumenstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DAS.2016.48\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, a signature verification method based on texture features involving off-line signatures written in two different Indian scripts is proposed. Both Local Binary Patterns (LBP) and Uniform Local Binary Patterns (ULBP), as powerful texture feature extraction techniques, are used for characterizing off-line signatures. The Nearest Neighbour (NN) technique is considered as the similarity metric for signature verification in the proposed method. To evaluate the proposed verification approach, a large Bangla and Hindi off-line signature dataset (BHSig260) comprising 6240 (260×24) genuine signatures and 7800 (260×30) skilled forgeries was introduced and further used for experimentation. We further used the GPDS-100 signature dataset for a comparison. The experiments were conducted, and the verification accuracies were separately computed for the LBP and ULBP texture features. There were no remarkable changes in the results obtained applying the LBP and ULBP features for verification when the BHSig260 and GPDS-100 signature datasets were used for experimentation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 12th IAPR Workshop on Document Analysis Systems (DAS)\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"67\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 12th IAPR Workshop on Document Analysis Systems (DAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DAS.2016.48\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 12th IAPR Workshop on Document Analysis Systems (DAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DAS.2016.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 67

摘要

本文提出了一种基于纹理特征的两种不同印度文字离线签名验证方法。局部二值模式(LBP)和统一局部二值模式(ULBP)作为一种强大的纹理特征提取技术,被用于离线签名的特征提取。该方法将最近邻(NN)技术作为签名验证的相似性度量。为了评估提出的验证方法,引入了一个大型孟加拉语和印地语离线签名数据集(BHSig260),其中包括6240个(260×24)真实签名和7800个(260×30)熟练的伪造签名,并进一步用于实验。我们进一步使用GPDS-100签名数据集进行比较。进行实验,分别计算LBP和ULBP纹理特征的验证精度。当使用BHSig260和GPDS-100签名数据集进行实验时,应用LBP和ULBP特征进行验证的结果没有显著变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of an Off-Line Signature Verification Method Based on Texture Features on a Large Indic-Script Signature Dataset
In this paper, a signature verification method based on texture features involving off-line signatures written in two different Indian scripts is proposed. Both Local Binary Patterns (LBP) and Uniform Local Binary Patterns (ULBP), as powerful texture feature extraction techniques, are used for characterizing off-line signatures. The Nearest Neighbour (NN) technique is considered as the similarity metric for signature verification in the proposed method. To evaluate the proposed verification approach, a large Bangla and Hindi off-line signature dataset (BHSig260) comprising 6240 (260×24) genuine signatures and 7800 (260×30) skilled forgeries was introduced and further used for experimentation. We further used the GPDS-100 signature dataset for a comparison. The experiments were conducted, and the verification accuracies were separately computed for the LBP and ULBP texture features. There were no remarkable changes in the results obtained applying the LBP and ULBP features for verification when the BHSig260 and GPDS-100 signature datasets were used for experimentation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信