考虑ICT生命周期评估中的行星边界

P. Bergmark, Gustaf Zachrisson
{"title":"考虑ICT生命周期评估中的行星边界","authors":"P. Bergmark, Gustaf Zachrisson","doi":"10.1109/ict4s55073.2022.00024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Realizing the need for establishing a better understanding of the impacts of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in relation to critical Earth System Processes, this paper provides an early exploration of how Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of ICT would need to develop to consider the Planetary Boundaries framework [1]. Based on identification of LCA impact categories and indicators, and earlier attempts to integrate the Planetary Boundaries framework into LCA, the study aims to identify a plausible way forward. Impact category indicators with some similarity in scope to the Planetary Boundaries’ control variables are identified based on the investigated life cycle impact assessment frameworks and a ranking is performed based on relevance. Moreover, it is explored how ICT LCA models and data would need to adjust to consider the Planetary Boundaries framework.The study concludes that integration of the Planetary Boundaries framework into LCA of ICT seems highly challenging. Not least, the development of a mature Planetary Boundaries life cycle impact assessment method will need considerable time and effort. It also concludes that once a method is available it will be complementary to traditional LCA approaches rather than replacing them. Moving forward the study sees two main steps: alignment of impact categories and establishment of granular Safe Operating Spaces needed to assess the absolute environmental sustainability of products.LCA practitioners in the ICT sector can prepare for this process by collecting spatially and temporally granular data and reflect this in their LCA models – a development that would also benefit the accuracy of traditional LCA. The practitioners may also prepare future use of PB-LCA by selecting functional units like ‘per subscription and year’ and LCIA indicators that somehow match Earth System Process control variables from a scope perspective (such as ReCiPe and ILCD indicators).","PeriodicalId":437454,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on ICT for Sustainability (ICT4S)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards considering Planetary Boundaries in Life Cycle Assessments of ICT\",\"authors\":\"P. Bergmark, Gustaf Zachrisson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ict4s55073.2022.00024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Realizing the need for establishing a better understanding of the impacts of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in relation to critical Earth System Processes, this paper provides an early exploration of how Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of ICT would need to develop to consider the Planetary Boundaries framework [1]. Based on identification of LCA impact categories and indicators, and earlier attempts to integrate the Planetary Boundaries framework into LCA, the study aims to identify a plausible way forward. Impact category indicators with some similarity in scope to the Planetary Boundaries’ control variables are identified based on the investigated life cycle impact assessment frameworks and a ranking is performed based on relevance. Moreover, it is explored how ICT LCA models and data would need to adjust to consider the Planetary Boundaries framework.The study concludes that integration of the Planetary Boundaries framework into LCA of ICT seems highly challenging. Not least, the development of a mature Planetary Boundaries life cycle impact assessment method will need considerable time and effort. It also concludes that once a method is available it will be complementary to traditional LCA approaches rather than replacing them. Moving forward the study sees two main steps: alignment of impact categories and establishment of granular Safe Operating Spaces needed to assess the absolute environmental sustainability of products.LCA practitioners in the ICT sector can prepare for this process by collecting spatially and temporally granular data and reflect this in their LCA models – a development that would also benefit the accuracy of traditional LCA. The practitioners may also prepare future use of PB-LCA by selecting functional units like ‘per subscription and year’ and LCIA indicators that somehow match Earth System Process control variables from a scope perspective (such as ReCiPe and ILCD indicators).\",\"PeriodicalId\":437454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 International Conference on ICT for Sustainability (ICT4S)\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 International Conference on ICT for Sustainability (ICT4S)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ict4s55073.2022.00024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on ICT for Sustainability (ICT4S)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ict4s55073.2022.00024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

认识到有必要更好地理解信息和通信技术(ICT)对关键地球系统过程的影响,本文提供了早期探索ICT的生命周期评估(LCA)需要如何发展以考虑行星边界框架[1]。基于对LCA影响类别和指标的确定,以及早先将行星边界框架纳入LCA的尝试,本研究旨在确定可行的前进方向。根据所调查的生命周期影响评估框架,确定与行星边界控制变量范围有一定相似性的影响类别指标,并根据相关性进行排名。此外,还探讨了ICT LCA模型和数据需要如何调整以考虑行星边界框架。该研究的结论是,将行星边界框架整合到ICT的LCA中似乎极具挑战性。尤其重要的是,制定成熟的行星边界生命周期影响评估方法将需要大量的时间和努力。它还得出结论,一旦一种方法可用,它将是对传统LCA方法的补充,而不是取代它们。接下来的研究分为两个主要步骤:调整影响类别和建立颗粒安全操作空间,以评估产品的绝对环境可持续性。ICT部门的LCA从业者可以通过收集空间和时间粒度数据并将其反映在他们的LCA模型中来为这一过程做好准备——这一发展也将有利于传统LCA的准确性。从业者也可以通过选择功能单元,如“每订阅和年”和LCIA指标,来准备PB-LCA的未来使用,从范围的角度来看,这些指标在某种程度上与地球系统过程控制变量(如ReCiPe和ILCD指标)相匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards considering Planetary Boundaries in Life Cycle Assessments of ICT
Realizing the need for establishing a better understanding of the impacts of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in relation to critical Earth System Processes, this paper provides an early exploration of how Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of ICT would need to develop to consider the Planetary Boundaries framework [1]. Based on identification of LCA impact categories and indicators, and earlier attempts to integrate the Planetary Boundaries framework into LCA, the study aims to identify a plausible way forward. Impact category indicators with some similarity in scope to the Planetary Boundaries’ control variables are identified based on the investigated life cycle impact assessment frameworks and a ranking is performed based on relevance. Moreover, it is explored how ICT LCA models and data would need to adjust to consider the Planetary Boundaries framework.The study concludes that integration of the Planetary Boundaries framework into LCA of ICT seems highly challenging. Not least, the development of a mature Planetary Boundaries life cycle impact assessment method will need considerable time and effort. It also concludes that once a method is available it will be complementary to traditional LCA approaches rather than replacing them. Moving forward the study sees two main steps: alignment of impact categories and establishment of granular Safe Operating Spaces needed to assess the absolute environmental sustainability of products.LCA practitioners in the ICT sector can prepare for this process by collecting spatially and temporally granular data and reflect this in their LCA models – a development that would also benefit the accuracy of traditional LCA. The practitioners may also prepare future use of PB-LCA by selecting functional units like ‘per subscription and year’ and LCIA indicators that somehow match Earth System Process control variables from a scope perspective (such as ReCiPe and ILCD indicators).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信