Qi Wang, K. Jaffrès-Runser, Yongjun Xu, Jean-Luc Scharbarg, Zhulin An, C. Fraboul
{"title":"无线多跳通信的TDMA与CSMA/CA:软实时网络的比较","authors":"Qi Wang, K. Jaffrès-Runser, Yongjun Xu, Jean-Luc Scharbarg, Zhulin An, C. Fraboul","doi":"10.1109/WFCS.2016.7496512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wireless networks have become a very attractive solution for soft real-time data transport in the industry. For such technologies to carry real-time traffic, reliable bounds on end-to-end communication delays have to be ascertained to warrant a proper system behavior. As for legacy wired embedded and real-time networks, two main wireless multiple access methods can be leveraged: (i) time division multiple access (TDMA), which follows a time-triggered paradigm and (ii) Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance (CSMA/CA), which follows an event-triggered paradigm. This paper proposes an analytical comparison of the time behavior of two representative TDMA and CSMA/CA protocols in terms of worst-case end-to-end delay. This worst-case delay is expressed in a probabilistic manner because our analytical framework captures the versatility of the wireless medium. Analytical delay bounds are obtained from delay distributions, which are compared to fine-grained simulation results. Exhibited study cases show that TDMA can offer smaller or larger worst-case bounds than CSMA/CA depending on its settings.","PeriodicalId":413770,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE World Conference on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TDMA versus CSMA/CA for wireless multi-hop communications: A comparison for soft real-time networking\",\"authors\":\"Qi Wang, K. Jaffrès-Runser, Yongjun Xu, Jean-Luc Scharbarg, Zhulin An, C. Fraboul\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WFCS.2016.7496512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Wireless networks have become a very attractive solution for soft real-time data transport in the industry. For such technologies to carry real-time traffic, reliable bounds on end-to-end communication delays have to be ascertained to warrant a proper system behavior. As for legacy wired embedded and real-time networks, two main wireless multiple access methods can be leveraged: (i) time division multiple access (TDMA), which follows a time-triggered paradigm and (ii) Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance (CSMA/CA), which follows an event-triggered paradigm. This paper proposes an analytical comparison of the time behavior of two representative TDMA and CSMA/CA protocols in terms of worst-case end-to-end delay. This worst-case delay is expressed in a probabilistic manner because our analytical framework captures the versatility of the wireless medium. Analytical delay bounds are obtained from delay distributions, which are compared to fine-grained simulation results. Exhibited study cases show that TDMA can offer smaller or larger worst-case bounds than CSMA/CA depending on its settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE World Conference on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE World Conference on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WFCS.2016.7496512\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE World Conference on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WFCS.2016.7496512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
TDMA versus CSMA/CA for wireless multi-hop communications: A comparison for soft real-time networking
Wireless networks have become a very attractive solution for soft real-time data transport in the industry. For such technologies to carry real-time traffic, reliable bounds on end-to-end communication delays have to be ascertained to warrant a proper system behavior. As for legacy wired embedded and real-time networks, two main wireless multiple access methods can be leveraged: (i) time division multiple access (TDMA), which follows a time-triggered paradigm and (ii) Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance (CSMA/CA), which follows an event-triggered paradigm. This paper proposes an analytical comparison of the time behavior of two representative TDMA and CSMA/CA protocols in terms of worst-case end-to-end delay. This worst-case delay is expressed in a probabilistic manner because our analytical framework captures the versatility of the wireless medium. Analytical delay bounds are obtained from delay distributions, which are compared to fine-grained simulation results. Exhibited study cases show that TDMA can offer smaller or larger worst-case bounds than CSMA/CA depending on its settings.