国际行政法庭

C. F. Amerasinghe
{"title":"国际行政法庭","authors":"C. F. Amerasinghe","doi":"10.1093/LAW/9780199660681.003.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"International administrative tribunals (IATs), like other international tribunals, generally are clearly tribunals of limited jurisdiction and not of general jurisdiction, as was recognized by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) specifically in relation to the International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal (ILOAT). The issue of the legality of establishment of IATs, which may be raised as a jurisdictional issue, provokes several questions. The first question relates to principles of interpretation of the constitutional instruments of international organizations from which the power to establish IATs must be derived. The jurisdictional competence ratione temporis must be distinguished from inadmissibility or irreceivability ratione temporis. Inadmissibility results from conditions required to be fulfilled by those provisions, as appropriately interpreted, sometimes in the light of general principles. The statute of a tribunal provides an exception to the requirement that internal remedies must be exhausted in the case of exceptional circumstances.Keywords: inadmissibility; international administrative tribunals (IATs); International Court of Justice (ICJ); international labour organization administrative tribunal (ILOAT); irreceivability; jurisdictional competence","PeriodicalId":382121,"journal":{"name":"Jurisdiction of International Tribunals","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International Administrative Tribunals\",\"authors\":\"C. F. Amerasinghe\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/LAW/9780199660681.003.0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"International administrative tribunals (IATs), like other international tribunals, generally are clearly tribunals of limited jurisdiction and not of general jurisdiction, as was recognized by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) specifically in relation to the International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal (ILOAT). The issue of the legality of establishment of IATs, which may be raised as a jurisdictional issue, provokes several questions. The first question relates to principles of interpretation of the constitutional instruments of international organizations from which the power to establish IATs must be derived. The jurisdictional competence ratione temporis must be distinguished from inadmissibility or irreceivability ratione temporis. Inadmissibility results from conditions required to be fulfilled by those provisions, as appropriately interpreted, sometimes in the light of general principles. The statute of a tribunal provides an exception to the requirement that internal remedies must be exhausted in the case of exceptional circumstances.Keywords: inadmissibility; international administrative tribunals (IATs); International Court of Justice (ICJ); international labour organization administrative tribunal (ILOAT); irreceivability; jurisdictional competence\",\"PeriodicalId\":382121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurisdiction of International Tribunals\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurisdiction of International Tribunals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/LAW/9780199660681.003.0015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurisdiction of International Tribunals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/LAW/9780199660681.003.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

国际行政法庭同其他国际法庭一样,一般来说显然是具有有限管辖权的法庭,而不是具有一般管辖权的法庭,国际法院(法院)就国际劳工组织行政法庭(劳工法庭)特别承认这一点。设立国际税务机构的合法性问题可以作为一个管辖权问题提出,它引发了几个问题。第一个问题涉及国际组织宪法文书的解释原则,设立国际仲裁机构的权力必须从这些文书中产生。属时管辖权必须与不可接受性或不可接受性区分开来。不予受理的原因是这些规定必须满足的条件,有时根据一般原则加以适当解释。法庭规约对在特殊情况下必须用尽内部补救办法的要求提供了例外。关键词:不能许可的事;国际行政法庭;国际法院;国际劳工组织行政法庭;irreceivability;司法能力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International Administrative Tribunals
International administrative tribunals (IATs), like other international tribunals, generally are clearly tribunals of limited jurisdiction and not of general jurisdiction, as was recognized by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) specifically in relation to the International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal (ILOAT). The issue of the legality of establishment of IATs, which may be raised as a jurisdictional issue, provokes several questions. The first question relates to principles of interpretation of the constitutional instruments of international organizations from which the power to establish IATs must be derived. The jurisdictional competence ratione temporis must be distinguished from inadmissibility or irreceivability ratione temporis. Inadmissibility results from conditions required to be fulfilled by those provisions, as appropriately interpreted, sometimes in the light of general principles. The statute of a tribunal provides an exception to the requirement that internal remedies must be exhausted in the case of exceptional circumstances.Keywords: inadmissibility; international administrative tribunals (IATs); International Court of Justice (ICJ); international labour organization administrative tribunal (ILOAT); irreceivability; jurisdictional competence
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信