研究报告:加州人对离线隐私的理解

C. Hoofnagle, J. King
{"title":"研究报告:加州人对离线隐私的理解","authors":"C. Hoofnagle, J. King","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1133075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many online privacy problems are rooted in the offline world, where businesses are free to sell consumers' personal information unless they voluntarily agree not to or where a specific law prohibits the practice. In order to gauge Californians' understanding of business practices with respect to the selling of customer data, we asked a representative sample of Californians about the default rules for protecting personal information in nine contexts. In six of those contexts (pizza delivery, donations to charities, product warranties, product rebates, phone numbers collected at the register, and catalog sales), a majority either didn't know or falsely believed that opt-in rules protected their personal information from being sold to others. In one context - grocery store club cards - a majority did not know or thought information could be sold when California law prohibited the sale. Only in two contexts - newspaper and magazine subscriptions and sweepstakes competitions - did our sample of Californians understand that personal information collected by a company could be sold to others. Respondents who shopped online were less likely to say that they didn't know the answer to the nine questions asked than those who never shopped online. In about half of the cases, those who shopped online answered correctly more often than those who do not shop online. Professor Alan Westin has pioneered a popular \"segmentation\" to describe Americans as fitting into one of three subgroups concerning privacy: privacy \"fundamentalists\" (high concern for privacy), \"pragmatists\" (mid-level concern), and the \"unconcerned\" (low or no privacy concern). When compared with these segments, Californians are more likely to be privacy pragmatists or fundamentalists, and less likely to be unconcerned about privacy. Fundamentalists were much more likely to be correct in their views of privacy rules. In light of this finding, we question Westin's conclusion that privacy pragmatists are well served by self-regulatory and opt-out approaches, as we found this subgroup of consumers is likely to misunderstand default rules in the marketplace.","PeriodicalId":179517,"journal":{"name":"Information Privacy Law eJournal","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research Report: What Californians Understand About Privacy Offline\",\"authors\":\"C. Hoofnagle, J. King\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1133075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many online privacy problems are rooted in the offline world, where businesses are free to sell consumers' personal information unless they voluntarily agree not to or where a specific law prohibits the practice. In order to gauge Californians' understanding of business practices with respect to the selling of customer data, we asked a representative sample of Californians about the default rules for protecting personal information in nine contexts. In six of those contexts (pizza delivery, donations to charities, product warranties, product rebates, phone numbers collected at the register, and catalog sales), a majority either didn't know or falsely believed that opt-in rules protected their personal information from being sold to others. In one context - grocery store club cards - a majority did not know or thought information could be sold when California law prohibited the sale. Only in two contexts - newspaper and magazine subscriptions and sweepstakes competitions - did our sample of Californians understand that personal information collected by a company could be sold to others. Respondents who shopped online were less likely to say that they didn't know the answer to the nine questions asked than those who never shopped online. In about half of the cases, those who shopped online answered correctly more often than those who do not shop online. Professor Alan Westin has pioneered a popular \\\"segmentation\\\" to describe Americans as fitting into one of three subgroups concerning privacy: privacy \\\"fundamentalists\\\" (high concern for privacy), \\\"pragmatists\\\" (mid-level concern), and the \\\"unconcerned\\\" (low or no privacy concern). When compared with these segments, Californians are more likely to be privacy pragmatists or fundamentalists, and less likely to be unconcerned about privacy. Fundamentalists were much more likely to be correct in their views of privacy rules. In light of this finding, we question Westin's conclusion that privacy pragmatists are well served by self-regulatory and opt-out approaches, as we found this subgroup of consumers is likely to misunderstand default rules in the marketplace.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Privacy Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Privacy Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1133075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Privacy Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1133075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

许多在线隐私问题的根源在于线下世界,在线下,企业可以自由地出售消费者的个人信息,除非他们自愿同意不这样做,或者有特定的法律禁止这种做法。为了衡量加州人对销售客户数据方面的商业惯例的理解,我们询问了加州人的代表性样本,了解在九种情况下保护个人信息的默认规则。在其中的六种情况下(披萨外卖、慈善捐款、产品保修、产品回扣、登记时收集的电话号码和目录销售),大多数人要么不知道,要么错误地认为选择加入规则保护了他们的个人信息不被出售给他人。在一种情况下——杂货店会员卡——当加州法律禁止销售信息时,大多数人不知道或认为信息可以出售。只有在两种情况下——报纸和杂志订阅和抽奖竞赛——我们的加州样本才明白,公司收集的个人信息可能会出售给他人。与从未在网上购物的受访者相比,在网上购物的受访者不知道9个问题的答案的可能性更小。在大约一半的情况下,那些在网上购物的人比那些不在网上购物的人回答正确的频率更高。艾伦·威斯汀教授开创了一个流行的“细分”理论,将美国人描述为三个关于隐私的小群体之一:隐私“原教旨主义者”(高度关注隐私),“实用主义者”(中等程度的关注)和“不关心”(低或没有隐私关注)。与这些部分相比,加州人更可能是隐私实用主义者或原教旨主义者,而不太可能不关心隐私。原教旨主义者对隐私规则的看法更有可能是正确的。鉴于这一发现,我们质疑威斯汀的结论,即隐私实用主义者通过自我监管和选择退出的方式得到了很好的服务,因为我们发现这部分消费者很可能误解了市场上的默认规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research Report: What Californians Understand About Privacy Offline
Many online privacy problems are rooted in the offline world, where businesses are free to sell consumers' personal information unless they voluntarily agree not to or where a specific law prohibits the practice. In order to gauge Californians' understanding of business practices with respect to the selling of customer data, we asked a representative sample of Californians about the default rules for protecting personal information in nine contexts. In six of those contexts (pizza delivery, donations to charities, product warranties, product rebates, phone numbers collected at the register, and catalog sales), a majority either didn't know or falsely believed that opt-in rules protected their personal information from being sold to others. In one context - grocery store club cards - a majority did not know or thought information could be sold when California law prohibited the sale. Only in two contexts - newspaper and magazine subscriptions and sweepstakes competitions - did our sample of Californians understand that personal information collected by a company could be sold to others. Respondents who shopped online were less likely to say that they didn't know the answer to the nine questions asked than those who never shopped online. In about half of the cases, those who shopped online answered correctly more often than those who do not shop online. Professor Alan Westin has pioneered a popular "segmentation" to describe Americans as fitting into one of three subgroups concerning privacy: privacy "fundamentalists" (high concern for privacy), "pragmatists" (mid-level concern), and the "unconcerned" (low or no privacy concern). When compared with these segments, Californians are more likely to be privacy pragmatists or fundamentalists, and less likely to be unconcerned about privacy. Fundamentalists were much more likely to be correct in their views of privacy rules. In light of this finding, we question Westin's conclusion that privacy pragmatists are well served by self-regulatory and opt-out approaches, as we found this subgroup of consumers is likely to misunderstand default rules in the marketplace.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信