{"title":"Introduccion。重要的是repercusión del contrto menor(介绍)。小额采购合同的重要性和影响","authors":"Manuel Peláez Muras","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3618961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Spanish Abstract:</b>El contrato menor arrastra muy mala fama. Seguramente desde siempre, como toda decisión discrecional de adjudicación de recursos limitados, pero en los últimos años ha recibido una atención mediática y doctrinal creciente, generalmente en sentido crítico y muy negativo, espoleada por los escándalos de corrupción en los que se ha hecho un uso irregular de esta figura. Se han dictado normas e instrucciones para regularlo y se ha ido arrinconando como un contrato sospechoso, que se califica de «excepcional» e incluso incompatible con los principios generales del derecho europeo de los contratos públicos.<br><br>Pero, ¿es de verdad excepcional el contrato menor? En este trabajo trato de responder a esa pregunta, concluyendo que no, a partir del análisis de la normativa española y de los países de nuestro entorno, en el que el menor español no es una rara avis ni mucho menos, y de ciertos condicionantes económicos, en los que la doctrina dominante no suele reparar, que hacen que los principios de la contratación se comporten de manera diferente en los contratos de pequeño importe.<br><br>Expuesta la lógica económica del contrato menor, concluyo con algunas propuestas de mejora e “higienización” del contrato menor y de la contratación pública en general, que deben venir de la gestión más que del derecho.<br><br><b>English Abstract:</b> Small public contracts (‘contratos menores’ in Spain, which are often the result of a direct award) have a very bad reputation. Surely it has been so always, as arguably happens with any discretionary allocation of limited resources. However, in the recent years ‘contratos menores’ have received increasing media and scholarly attention, generally in critical and very negative terms, prompted by corruption scandals in which a bad use of this procurement tool has been made. Legal rules and orders have been issued to regulate small contracts, which have been seen as a suspicious kind of contract, described as “exceptional\" or even incompatible with the general principles of the European public procurement law.<br><br>But are small contracts really exceptional? In this work I attempt to answer this question. I conclude that they are not. conclusion is negative, relying on the analysis of the regulation in Spain and other countries around us, among which the Spanish ‘contrato menor’ is far from being a rare bird, as well as on certain economic factors largely disregarded by the streamline academia, which make the procurement principles function in a different way with respect to low-value contracts.<br><br>Once the economic rationale of small contracts is shown, the work is finished with a number of proposals for the improvement and \"sanitation\" of small contracts and public procurement in general, which require better management rather than more or different regulations.","PeriodicalId":330590,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Procurement (Topic)","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introducción. Importancia y repercusión del contrato menor (Introduction. The Importance and Repercussion of Small Procurement Contracts)\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Peláez Muras\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3618961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<b>Spanish Abstract:</b>El contrato menor arrastra muy mala fama. Seguramente desde siempre, como toda decisión discrecional de adjudicación de recursos limitados, pero en los últimos años ha recibido una atención mediática y doctrinal creciente, generalmente en sentido crítico y muy negativo, espoleada por los escándalos de corrupción en los que se ha hecho un uso irregular de esta figura. Se han dictado normas e instrucciones para regularlo y se ha ido arrinconando como un contrato sospechoso, que se califica de «excepcional» e incluso incompatible con los principios generales del derecho europeo de los contratos públicos.<br><br>Pero, ¿es de verdad excepcional el contrato menor? En este trabajo trato de responder a esa pregunta, concluyendo que no, a partir del análisis de la normativa española y de los países de nuestro entorno, en el que el menor español no es una rara avis ni mucho menos, y de ciertos condicionantes económicos, en los que la doctrina dominante no suele reparar, que hacen que los principios de la contratación se comporten de manera diferente en los contratos de pequeño importe.<br><br>Expuesta la lógica económica del contrato menor, concluyo con algunas propuestas de mejora e “higienización” del contrato menor y de la contratación pública en general, que deben venir de la gestión más que del derecho.<br><br><b>English Abstract:</b> Small public contracts (‘contratos menores’ in Spain, which are often the result of a direct award) have a very bad reputation. Surely it has been so always, as arguably happens with any discretionary allocation of limited resources. However, in the recent years ‘contratos menores’ have received increasing media and scholarly attention, generally in critical and very negative terms, prompted by corruption scandals in which a bad use of this procurement tool has been made. Legal rules and orders have been issued to regulate small contracts, which have been seen as a suspicious kind of contract, described as “exceptional\\\" or even incompatible with the general principles of the European public procurement law.<br><br>But are small contracts really exceptional? In this work I attempt to answer this question. I conclude that they are not. conclusion is negative, relying on the analysis of the regulation in Spain and other countries around us, among which the Spanish ‘contrato menor’ is far from being a rare bird, as well as on certain economic factors largely disregarded by the streamline academia, which make the procurement principles function in a different way with respect to low-value contracts.<br><br>Once the economic rationale of small contracts is shown, the work is finished with a number of proposals for the improvement and \\\"sanitation\\\" of small contracts and public procurement in general, which require better management rather than more or different regulations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Procurement (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Procurement (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3618961\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Procurement (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3618961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
小合同名声不好。当然,就像任何分配有限资源的自由裁量决定一样,但近年来,它受到了越来越多的媒体和教义关注,通常是批评和非常负面的,这是由腐败丑闻引发的,在这些丑闻中,这个数字被滥用。已经制定了规范它的规则和指示,但它作为一种可疑的合同被搁置一边,被描述为“例外”,甚至不符合欧洲公共采购法的一般原则。但小合同真的是例外吗?在这个工作试图回答这个问题,我们不这样做,从西班牙和政策分析,环境的国家,小雅西班牙语是一种罕见的搜查公告不更不用说,和一定的经济条件,在主流学说通常不会修复,让采购原则不同的小金额的合同。在阐述了小合同的经济逻辑之后,我最后提出了一些改进和“净化”小合同和公共采购的建议,这些建议应该来自管理而不是法律。English (public Abstract: Small contracts以下合同' in Spain, which are往往原因非常direct award) have a bad reputation。当然,它总是这样的,因为它可能发生在有限资源的自由分配上。然而,近年来,“小合同”受到越来越多的媒体和学术关注,通常是批评和非常负面的条款,这是由于腐败丑闻造成的,在这些丑闻中滥用了这种采购工具。已经发布了管理小型合同的法律规则和命令,这些小合同被视为一种可疑的合同,被描述为“例外”,甚至不符合欧洲公共采购法的一般原则。但小合同真的例外吗?在这篇文章中,我试图回答这个问题。我认为他们不是。结论是消极的,relying on the analysis of the regulation in Spain第and other countries around us, which the[‘小合同中is far from being a rare bird, as well as on某些经济因素largely disregarded by the streamline学院lending, which make the采购原则function in a way with respect to low-value合同。一旦揭示了小合同的经济合理性,工作就完成了,提出了许多关于改进和“净化”小合同和公共采购的建议,这需要更好的管理,而不是更多或不同的规章。
Introducción. Importancia y repercusión del contrato menor (Introduction. The Importance and Repercussion of Small Procurement Contracts)
Spanish Abstract:El contrato menor arrastra muy mala fama. Seguramente desde siempre, como toda decisión discrecional de adjudicación de recursos limitados, pero en los últimos años ha recibido una atención mediática y doctrinal creciente, generalmente en sentido crítico y muy negativo, espoleada por los escándalos de corrupción en los que se ha hecho un uso irregular de esta figura. Se han dictado normas e instrucciones para regularlo y se ha ido arrinconando como un contrato sospechoso, que se califica de «excepcional» e incluso incompatible con los principios generales del derecho europeo de los contratos públicos.
Pero, ¿es de verdad excepcional el contrato menor? En este trabajo trato de responder a esa pregunta, concluyendo que no, a partir del análisis de la normativa española y de los países de nuestro entorno, en el que el menor español no es una rara avis ni mucho menos, y de ciertos condicionantes económicos, en los que la doctrina dominante no suele reparar, que hacen que los principios de la contratación se comporten de manera diferente en los contratos de pequeño importe.
Expuesta la lógica económica del contrato menor, concluyo con algunas propuestas de mejora e “higienización” del contrato menor y de la contratación pública en general, que deben venir de la gestión más que del derecho.
English Abstract: Small public contracts (‘contratos menores’ in Spain, which are often the result of a direct award) have a very bad reputation. Surely it has been so always, as arguably happens with any discretionary allocation of limited resources. However, in the recent years ‘contratos menores’ have received increasing media and scholarly attention, generally in critical and very negative terms, prompted by corruption scandals in which a bad use of this procurement tool has been made. Legal rules and orders have been issued to regulate small contracts, which have been seen as a suspicious kind of contract, described as “exceptional" or even incompatible with the general principles of the European public procurement law.
But are small contracts really exceptional? In this work I attempt to answer this question. I conclude that they are not. conclusion is negative, relying on the analysis of the regulation in Spain and other countries around us, among which the Spanish ‘contrato menor’ is far from being a rare bird, as well as on certain economic factors largely disregarded by the streamline academia, which make the procurement principles function in a different way with respect to low-value contracts.
Once the economic rationale of small contracts is shown, the work is finished with a number of proposals for the improvement and "sanitation" of small contracts and public procurement in general, which require better management rather than more or different regulations.